Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
XLK wins this head-to-head comparison due to its superior technical momentum and lower expense ratio, despite QQQ's larger net assets. XLK is trading closer to its 52-week high and shows stronger short-term technical indicators. While both ETFs track technology-heavy indices, XLK's current price action and cost efficiency give it an edge for investors prioritizing momentum and value. QQQ, while a dominant force in large-cap growth, exhibits slightly weaker short-term technical signals and carries a higher operational cost. Investors seeking a more cost-effective exposure to the tech sector with strong current momentum should favor XLK.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between XLK and QQQ is XLK's lower expense ratio and its current superior technical momentum. While both ETFs offer exposure to technology and growth, XLK is more cost-efficient for investors and is showing stronger immediate price action, trading closer to its 52-week high with more aggressive momentum indicators. This combination of lower cost and stronger current technicals makes XLK the more compelling choice for investors prioritizing efficiency and immediate performance.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both XLK and QQQ remains positive, driven by the continued innovation and growth within the technology sector. XLK is expected to benefit from its focused exposure to technology companies, potentially outperforming if specific tech sub-sectors experience a surge. Its lower expense ratio provides a structural advantage for sustained growth. QQQ, with its broader large-cap growth focus, is well-positioned to capture gains from dominant tech players and other growth-oriented companies. However, its higher expense ratio could slightly dampen returns compared to XLK over the long term, particularly if market conditions become less favorable for aggressive growth.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $126.68 - $198.73 | $555.60 - $748.65 |
| Prev. Close | $194.71 | $741.10 |
| Market Cap | 43.68B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 6.00M | 30.02M |
XLK is currently trading at $196.27, which is 0.98% below its 52-week high of $198.73 and significantly above its 52-week low of $126.68. This positions XLK favorably, indicating strong recent performance and upward price pressure. QQQ, trading at $744.50, is 0.55% below its 52-week high of $748.65 and well above its 52-week low of $555.60. Both ETFs demonstrate strong upward trends from their lows, but XLK's proximity to its peak suggests more immediate upward momentum. The expense ratio for XLK is 0.08%, translating to $8.00 per $10,000 invested, while QQQ has a higher expense ratio of 0.18%, costing $18.00 per $10,000 invested. This cost difference is a significant factor in long-term returns.
Market Performance
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 25.21% | 18.08% |
| 24h Range | $195.05 - $196.94 | $739.64 - $745.91 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 67.8 | 66.2 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
XLK has shown higher recent volatility (25.2%) compared to QQQ (18.1%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both. Momentum indicators suggest potential overbought conditions.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 67.79 | 66.15 |
| 50-Day MA | $184.47 | $712.66 |
| 200-Day MA | $163.68 | $665.59 |
XLK is exhibiting stronger current technical momentum, with its price trading at $196.27, well above its 20-day EMA ($189.61), 50-day SMA ($184.47), and 200-day SMA ($163.68). Its RSI is at 67.79, indicating strong upward momentum without being overbought, and its Stochastic is at a high 95.49, suggesting strong buying pressure. QQQ is also trading above its key moving averages (20-day EMA $725.15, 50-day SMA $712.66, 200-day SMA $665.59), with an RSI of 66.15 and Stochastic at 92.43. While both show bullish technicals, XLK's indicators, particularly its RSI and Stochastic levels, suggest a more immediate upward thrust and a position closer to its 52-week high.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
XLK
Technical Score: 79/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 79/100
Analyst ratings and targets are not provided for either XLK or QQQ, making sentiment analysis reliant on price action and technical indicators. Both ETFs are trading well within their 52-week ranges and show positive momentum. The strong year-to-date returns for both suggest positive sentiment within the technology and growth sectors. XLK's slightly stronger technical readings, including a higher RSI and Stochastic, may imply a marginally more positive short-term sentiment compared to QQQ.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.91 | 0.82 |
The primary risk for both XLK and QQQ is concentration in the technology sector. A significant downturn in major tech companies could disproportionately impact their performance. Regulatory scrutiny on large technology firms represents another key risk. For XLK, the risk of underperformance relative to its category in the 1-year period (42.84% fund vs 54.99% category) warrants attention, although its longer-term category-relative returns are strong. QQQ faces the risk of its higher expense ratio eroding returns over time, especially if category performance moderates. Additionally, QQQ's higher net assets ($488.98 billion) compared to XLK ($121.44 billion) could imply slightly less agility in very fast-moving markets, though this is a minor consideration.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider XLK for its lower cost and stronger current technical momentum, making it a more efficient choice for capturing near-term upside in the tech sector.
- Monitor the technology sector's regulatory landscape, as increased scrutiny could pose a risk to both XLK and QQQ holdings.
- While QQQ has larger net assets, XLK's superior expense ratio and comparable long-term category-relative returns make it a more attractive option for cost-conscious investors.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
XLK
Current: $196.27
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$186.46
Aggressive
$196.27
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$180.86
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$195.78
+10%
$205.10
+15%
$214.42
QQQ
Current: $744.50
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$707.28
Aggressive
$744.50
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$686.06
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$742.64
+10%
$778.00
+15%
$813.37
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored XLK based on technical setup. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, XLK or QQQ?+
XLK is the preferred buy due to its lower expense ratio (0.08% vs 0.18%) and stronger current technical momentum, indicated by its higher RSI and Stochastic readings and proximity to its 52-week high. Both ETFs offer significant exposure to the technology sector.
What are the key risks for XLK compared to QQQ?+
Both ETFs face risks from technology sector concentration and potential regulatory actions against major tech firms. XLK's risk includes its 1-year trailing return lagging its category, while QQQ's risks include its higher expense ratio and potential for underperformance if the Nasdaq-100's growth moderates.
How do XLK and QQQ compare on cost?+
XLK is significantly cheaper to own, with an expense ratio of 0.08% ($8.00 per $10,000 invested) compared to QQQ's 0.18% ($18.00 per $10,000 invested). This cost advantage favors XLK for long-term investors.
What is the sector exposure for XLK and QQQ?+
XLK is exclusively focused on the Technology sector (100% allocation). QQQ, while heavily weighted in Technology (59.15%), also includes exposure to other sectors like Healthcare (4.02%) and Industrials (3.91%).
How has XLK performed relative to its category?+
XLK has outperformed its category over the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, with returns of 29.39%, 19.51%, and 24.31% respectively. Its 1-year return of 42.84% is slightly below its category's 54.99%.
How has QQQ performed relative to its category?+
QQQ has outperformed its category over the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, with returns of 24.51%, 14.23%, and 20.78% respectively. Its 1-year return of 26.35% is slightly below its category's 29.03%.
What are the net assets of XLK and QQQ?+
QQQ has substantially larger net assets at $488.98 billion, compared to XLK's $121.44 billion. This indicates QQQ is a more dominant fund in terms of investor capital.