Jump to any asset
844 assets, updated daily
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
While both ETFs track technology-heavy indices, XLK offers a more cost-effective way to gain exposure to the sector. QQQ, despite its broader growth mandate, shows weaker relative performance in certain timeframes and carries a higher cost for investors. XLK's established track record and significant net assets further solidify its position as the preferred choice for investors prioritizing value and sector-specific exposure. The current market conditions favor a more conservative approach, which XLK's valuation metrics currently support better than QQQ's.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between XLK and QQQ is their expense ratio and sector concentration. XLK offers a lower cost of ownership at 0.08% compared to QQQ's 0.18%, making it a more efficient vehicle for sector exposure. Additionally, XLK's 100% allocation to technology contrasts with QQQ's more diversified growth focus, making XLK a purer position on the tech sector. This lower cost and focused exposure are the primary reasons XLK is the preferred choice for investors seeking value and targeted sector investment.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for XLK is cautiously optimistic, driven by its lower cost and strong year-to-date performance, suggesting continued leadership within the technology sector. Its 100% tech allocation positions it to benefit from any further advancements and adoption in areas like AI and cloud computing. QQQ's outlook is more mixed; while it offers broader growth exposure, its higher expense ratio and recent underperformance relative to XLK present headwinds. A scenario where technology continues its strong earnings trajectory favors XLK, while a broader economic expansion benefiting a wider range of growth companies could see QQQ catch up, provided its higher fees do not impede net returns.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $126.68 - $203.25 | $555.60 - $762.86 |
| Prev. Close | $196.28 | $743.57 |
| Net Assets | 127.30B | 498.95B |
| 24h Volume | 561.68K | 51.07M |
XLK presents a more attractive valuation profile compared to QQQ. Their underlying holdings and expense ratios offer a proxy for valuation. XLK boasts a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to QQQ's 0.18%, translating to a cost of $8.00 per $10,000 invested versus $18.00 for QQQ. This cost advantage directly impacts net returns. Also, XLK's net assets of $127.3 billion indicate substantial investor confidence and liquidity, suggesting a more stable and potentially undervalued asset relative to its operational costs. QQQ's larger net assets of $498.9 billion do not offset its higher fees in a valuation context.
Market Performance
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D, annualized) | 18.75% | 16.96% |
| 24h Range | $190.29 - $194.63 | $726.39 - $740.53 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 45.9 | 44.6 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~18%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.90 | 44.59 |
| 50-Day MA | $189.94 | $726.65 |
| 200-Day MA | $167.11 | $673.92 |
Technically, both XLK and QQQ are exhibiting signs of weakness, trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages. XLK's 20-day EMA is at $195.24, while its current price is $190.315, and its RSI is 45.9. QQQ's 20-day EMA is at $740.08, with its price at $728.95 and an RSI of 44.59. Both ETFs are also showing oversold conditions on their stochastic indicators, with XLK at 2.53 and QQQ at 6.72. However, XLK's price is trading above its 50-day simple moving average ($189.94), suggesting some underlying support, whereas QQQ is trading just above its 50-day SMA ($726.65). The MACD for XLK is positive at 2.25, while QQQ's MACD is significantly higher at 5.99, indicating stronger recent upward momentum for QQQ, despite its current price weakness.
AI Analyst Sentiment
AI rating: CleaRank Financial AI's overall score for each asset, the same score shown on its own analysis page. It combines price trend and momentum with valuation, analyst and insider data where they exist.
XLK
AI Score: 78/100
QQQ
AI Score: 75/100
Sentiment for both XLK and QQQ is neutral to slightly bearish based on their current technical indicators. Both ETFs have RSI values below 50, indicating a lack of strong buying pressure. XLK's CCI of -134.86 and QQQ's CCI of -139.10 suggest significant downward momentum. The fact that both are trading below their 20-day EMAs reinforces this sentiment. However, XLK's price is holding above its 50-day SMA, which could be interpreted as a sign of underlying resilience or potential for a near-term bounce, contrasting with QQQ's position just below its 50-day SMA. Investor sentiment appears to be cautious for both, with a slight edge to XLK for maintaining a key support level.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | XLK | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.08 | 0.98 |
The primary risk for XLK lies in its concentrated exposure to the technology sector. A significant downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or macroeconomic headwinds, would disproportionately impact XLK. Its higher concentration in technology (100%) compared to QQQ (60.33%) amplifies this sector-specific risk. QQQ, while also tech-heavy, offers slightly more diversification across other growth sectors like Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical, which could mitigate some sector-specific downturns. However, QQQ's higher expense ratio presents an ongoing drag on performance, representing a consistent risk to net returns over the long term.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider XLK for a cost-effective, pure-position exposure to the technology sector.
- Monitor QQQ's performance relative to its higher expense ratio; ensure outperformance justifies the cost.
- Given current technical weakness in both, consider dollar-cost averaging into XLK for long-term value.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
XLK
Current: $190.32
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$180.80
Aggressive
$190.32
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$175.38
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$199.83
+10% from current
$209.35
+15% from current
$218.86
QQQ
Current: $728.95
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$692.50
Aggressive
$728.95
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$671.73
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$765.40
+10% from current
$801.85
+15% from current
$838.29
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored XLK based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key risks for XLK compared to QQQ?+
XLK's primary risk is its 100% concentration in the technology sector, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. QQQ, while also tech-heavy, offers slightly more diversification across other growth sectors, potentially mitigating some of this risk.
Which ETF is cheaper to own, XLK or QQQ?+
XLK is significantly cheaper to own, with an expense ratio of 0.08% ($8.00 per $10,000 invested) compared to QQQ's 0.18% ($18.00 per $10,000 invested).
How do XLK and QQQ compare in terms of historical performance?+
XLK has outperformed QQQ over the year-to-date (36.41% vs 20.83%), 5-year (22.14% vs 16.32%), and 10-year (24.67% vs 20.91%) periods, indicating stronger historical returns.
What is the sector exposure of XLK versus QQQ?+
XLK is 100% concentrated in the Technology sector. QQQ has a more diversified growth focus, with Technology comprising 60.33%, followed by Communication Services (12.59%) and Consumer Cyclical (10.07%).
What are the current technical indicators suggesting for XLK and QQQ?+
Both ETFs show signs of weakness, trading below their 20-day EMAs with low RSI values. However, XLK is holding above its 50-day SMA, while QQQ is trading just below it, suggesting slightly more technical support for XLK.
How do the net assets and fund family differ between XLK and QQQ?+
XLK has net assets of $127.3 billion from State Street Investment Management, while QQQ has significantly larger net assets of $498.9 billion from Invesco.