TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 849 assets, updated daily

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

QQQ

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 NASDAQ

$751.27 ▲ 0.49%
VS

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF NASDAQ

$309.39 ▲ 0.50%
Last updated: • QQQ at $751.27, QQQM at $309.39
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

QQQM wins due to its lower expense ratio and slightly higher dividend yield, offering a more cost-effective way to gain exposure to the Nasdaq-100. While both QQQ and QQQM track the Nasdaq-100 index and exhibit similar performance across various timeframes, QQQM's lower expense ratio translates to better net returns for investors over the long term. QQQ's larger net assets and longer history do not outweigh the direct cost savings offered by QQQM. Investors prioritizing cost efficiency and a marginally higher yield will find QQQM the superior choice for Nasdaq-100 exposure. The choice between them hinges on whether the slight cost advantage of QQQM is more appealing than the established track record and larger asset base of QQQ. For most investors, the difference in expense ratio is the deciding factor.

Key Differentiator

The key differentiator between QQQ and QQQM is their expense ratio and associated cost to the investor. QQQM boasts a lower expense ratio of 0.0015 compared to QQQ's 0.0018. This seemingly small difference translates to a tangible cost saving for investors, particularly those holding the ETF for extended periods. While both ETFs offer identical exposure to the Nasdaq-100 index, QQQM provides this exposure at a marginally lower cost, making it the more efficient choice for maximizing long-term returns after fees.

Joint Outlook

The outlook for both QQQ and QQQM remains closely tied to the performance of the technology sector and the broader Nasdaq-100 index. Given the current market environment favoring growth and innovation, both ETFs are expected to continue their upward trajectory, assuming no major macroeconomic shocks or regulatory headwinds for tech giants. A scenario of continued economic expansion and low interest rates would likely benefit both funds significantly. Conversely, a sharp rise in interest rates or a significant slowdown in tech earnings could lead to a period of consolidation or decline for both QQQ and QQQM. Their performance will largely mirror the Nasdaq-100's ability to maintain its growth momentum.

Price Analysis Comparison

Asset Metrics i

Asset Metrics: QQQ vs QQQM
Metric QQQ QQQM
52 Week Range $555.60 - $762.86 $228.75 - $314.11
Prev. Close $747.58 $307.85
Market Cap 261.11B N/A
24h Volume 21.12M 1.62M
Valuation is not directly applicable to ETFs as they represent a basket of securities. However, we can infer relative value based on their underlying holdings and expense ratios. QQQM, with an expense ratio of 0.0015, is cheaper than QQQ at 0.0018. This means for every $10,000 invested, QQQM costs $15.00 annually, while QQQ costs $18.00. Over time, this difference in cost compounds, making QQQM more attractive from a total return perspective. Both ETFs hold the same underlying Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Cyclical stocks, so their fundamental valuation metrics are identical. The key differentiator here is the cost of ownership.

Market Performance i

Market Performance: QQQ vs QQQM
Metric QQQ QQQM
Volatility (30D) 17.19% 17.26%
24h Range $748.37 - $752.87 $308.17 - $309.95
Market Strength (RSI) 57.8 58.0
Trend (SMA 50) Bullish Bullish
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~17%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: QQQ vs QQQM
Indicator QQQ QQQM
RSI (14) 57.83 58.01
50-Day MA $724.52 $298.33
200-Day MA $672.18 $276.76
Both QQQ and QQQM exhibit similar technical profiles, reflecting their common underlying index. QQQ is trading at $751.27, above its 50-day SMA of $724.52 and 200-day SMA of $672.18, indicating a bullish trend. Its RSI is 57.83, suggesting positive momentum without being overbought. QQQM is trading at $309.39, above its 50-day SMA of $298.33 and 200-day SMA of $276.76, also confirming an uptrend. Its RSI is 58.01, mirroring QQQ's momentum. Both ETFs show similar MACD values relative to their price scales, with positive histograms and signal line crossovers suggesting continued upward movement. Their technicals are nearly indistinguishable.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

QQQ

Buy
Technical Score: 75/100

QQQM

Buy
Technical Score: 78/100
Sentiment for both QQQ and QQQM is driven by the overall market perception of the technology sector and the Nasdaq-100 index. As these are ETFs, analyst ratings and median targets are not directly applicable to the funds themselves but rather to their underlying constituents. The strong historical performance and continued dominance of technology companies within the index suggest a generally positive sentiment. Investor demand for broad-market tech exposure remains high, as evidenced by the substantial net assets of both funds. The market's continued focus on growth and innovation within the technology space underpins a positive outlook for both ETFs.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: QQQ vs QQQM
Metric QQQ QQQM
Sharpe Ratio 0.94 0.95
The primary risk for both QQQ and QQQM is concentration risk within the technology sector. A significant downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, increased competition, or a broader economic slowdown, would disproportionately impact both ETFs. QQQ, with its larger net assets of $488.98 billion, might experience slightly more liquidity risk in extreme market conditions compared to QQQM's $104.38 billion, although both are highly liquid. QQQM's shorter inception date (2020) means it has a less extensive track record compared to QQQ (1999), which could be perceived as a minor risk for investors valuing long-term historical data. However, their performance is intrinsically linked to the same index.

Comparative ProTips

  • For cost-conscious investors focused on Nasdaq-100 exposure, QQQM's lower expense ratio provides a direct advantage.
  • Consider QQQ if you prioritize investing in the largest, most established Nasdaq-100 ETF, though at a slightly higher cost.
  • Both ETFs offer similar exposure and performance; the decision hinges primarily on the expense ratio and dividend yield.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
QQQ
Current: $751.27
ENTRY ZONES
$713.71
$751.27
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$692.30
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$749.39
+10%
$785.08
+15%
$820.76
QQQM
Current: $309.39
ENTRY ZONES
$293.92
$309.39
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$285.10
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$308.62
+10%
$323.31
+15%
$338.01
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored QQQM based on income/dividend profile. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, QQQ or QQQM?+
QQQM is a better buy due to its lower expense ratio (0.0015 vs 0.0018) and slightly higher dividend yield. This makes it more cost-effective for long-term investors seeking Nasdaq-100 exposure.
What are the key risks for QQQ vs QQQM?+
The primary risk for both is concentration in the technology sector. A significant tech downturn would impact both similarly. QQQ has a longer track record, while QQQM is newer but offers lower costs.
How do the expense ratios of QQQ and QQQM compare?+
QQQM has a lower expense ratio of 0.0015, making it 0.0003 cheaper annually than QQQ's expense ratio of 0.0018. This translates to an annual saving of $3.00 per $10,000 invested in favor of QQQM.
What is the dividend yield difference between QQQ and QQQM?+
QQQM offers a slightly higher dividend yield of approximately 0.0044 compared to QQQ's yield of 0.0041. While small, this difference can contribute to higher total returns over time.
How do QQQ and QQQM perform relative to their category?+
Both QQQ and QQQM have outperformed their category over the 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, demonstrating strong performance consistent with the Nasdaq-100 index.
What are the net assets of QQQ and QQQM?+
QQQ has significantly larger net assets ($488.98 billion) compared to QQQM ($104.38 billion), indicating greater investor adoption and a longer history for QQQ.
How concentrated are the sector holdings in QQQ and QQQM?+
Both ETFs are heavily concentrated in Technology (59.15%), followed by Communication Services (12.7%) and Consumer Cyclical (11.11%), reflecting the composition of the Nasdaq-100 index.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of QQQ vs QQQM is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 11, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.