TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

ETF·NYSE

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF XLF

$55.52 ▲ 0.45%
Buy
66 / 100 AI score
Full XLF analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF XLK

$183.47 ▼ 3.02%
Buy
71 / 100 AI score
Full XLK analysis →
01

The short version

How XLF and XLK compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

XLF and XLK on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours XLK
XLF XLK
66/100 AI score 71/100
+6.4% 1-year change +28.7%
13.6% Volatility (30d, yearly) 22.9%
54.6 RSI (14-day) 33.3
The verdict
XLK wins this head-to-head comparison, demonstrating superior momentum and a stronger growth profile despite XLF's higher dividend yield. XLK's year-to-date return of 36.41% significantly outpaces XLF's -1.36%. While XLF offers a more attractive dividend yield at 1.56% compared to XLK's 0.43%, XLK's technological focus has driven substantial capital appreciation, making it the preferred choice for investors prioritizing growth and upside potential. XLF, heavily weighted towards Financial Services (98.21%), has lagged due to sector headwinds, whereas XLK's concentrated technology exposure has capitalized on market trends.
Key difference
The decisive factor separating XLK and XLF is their sector focus and resulting performance trajectory. XLK's pure-position technology exposure has fueled exceptional year-to-date growth, while XLF's diversified financial services holdings have struggled to keep pace, highlighting the stark difference in sector-specific momentum.
Outlook
XLK is expected to continue benefiting from the ongoing digital transformation and innovation within the technology sector, although it may experience increased volatility given its recent pullback. A sustained rally in tech stocks could see XLK retest its highs. XLF's outlook is more subdued, tied to the performance of financial institutions, which are sensitive to interest rate policies and overall economic health. A stable or improving economic environment could support XLF, but significant upside may be limited without a broader sector rotation.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
XLF XLK

Over 1 year: XLF gained 4.3% and XLK gained 29.1%, a gap of 24.8 points in XLK's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

How big each is, where each trades in its year, and its trend.

XLF XLK
$51.0B Size (net assets / market cap) $127.3B
$43.0M 24h volume $15.3M
72% Position in 52-week range 74%
-1.3% Price against 50-day average -3.4%
Reading
XLF trades at a price of $55.52 with a 52-week high of $58.60 and a low of $47.67, indicating it is closer to its 52-week high than its low. XLK is priced at $183.47, with its 52-week range spanning from $126.68 to $203.25. XLK is currently trading below its 52-week high, suggesting some recent price weakness, but remains well above its 52-week low. Both ETFs share an identical expense ratio of 0.08%, costing $8.00 per $10,000 invested, and are managed by State Street Investment Management.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

XLF XLK
66/100 AI score 71/100
54.6 RSI (14-day) 33.3
-1.3% Price against 50-day average -3.4%
+3.4% Price against 200-day average +9.5%
Technicals
XLK is currently exhibiting weak momentum, with an RSI of 33.33 and a CCI of -200.48, indicating it is oversold and potentially due for a bounce. Its price is trading below its 20-day EMA ($193.47) and 50-day SMA ($189.93), but above its 200-day SMA ($167.51). XLF shows more neutral momentum with an RSI of 54.61 and a CCI of 149.66. XLF's price is trading below its 50-day SMA ($56.28) but above its 20-day EMA ($54.90) and 200-day SMA ($53.68), suggesting a more stable, albeit less dynamic, technical picture.
Sentiment
Analyst ratings and median targets are not available for either XLF or XLK. Sentiment for XLK appears to be shifting from overbought to oversold based on its RSI and CCI readings, suggesting a potential short-term reversal or consolidation. XLF's technical indicators suggest a more balanced sentiment, with momentum neither excessively strong nor weak.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

XLF XLK
13.6% Volatility (30d, yearly) 22.9%
0.56 Sharpe ratio 0.97
Risk
The primary risk for XLK lies in its concentrated exposure to the technology sector; any downturn in major tech companies or regulatory changes could significantly impact its performance. Its recent sharp decline from its 52-week high also signals potential for increased volatility. XLF's risks are tied to the cyclical nature of the financial services industry, including interest rate sensitivity, regulatory changes, and potential economic slowdowns that could affect lending and investment banking activities. Its lower year-to-date return also presents a risk of underperformance.
ProTips
  1. Consider XLK for aggressive growth mandates, but be mindful of its high concentration risk.
  2. XLF may appeal to income-focused investors, but its performance is heavily dependent on the financial sector's economic cycle.
  3. Both ETFs share the same low expense ratio, making cost a non-factor in this comparison.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

Thousands of paths from each price history: the median and the 90th percentile for each.

202620282030203220342036
XLF median XLF 90th XLK median XLK 90th
XLF XLK
$8,894 Downside, 2036 (10th) $9,941
$21,850 Base case, 2036 (median) $27,491
$53,678 Upside, 2036 (90th) $76,027

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in XLF grows to about $21,900 and $10,000 in XLK to about $27,500 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
XLF
Current: $55.52
ENTRY ZONES
$52.74
$55.52
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$51.16
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$58.30
+10% from current
$61.07
+15% from current
$63.85
XLK
Current: $183.47
ENTRY ZONES
$174.30
$183.47
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$169.07
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$192.64
+10% from current
$201.82
+15% from current
$210.99
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored XLK based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, XLF or XLK?+
XLK is the better buy for growth-oriented investors due to its superior year-to-date return of 36.41% compared to XLF's -1.36%. While XLF offers a higher dividend yield, XLK's technological focus provides greater upside potential.
How do XLF and XLK compare on expense ratios?+
Both XLF and XLK have identical expense ratios of 0.08%, resulting in the same cost of $8.00 per $10,000 invested.
Which ETF offers a better dividend yield?+
XLF offers a more attractive dividend yield of 1.56% compared to XLK's 0.43%.
What are the sector exposures of XLF and XLK?+
XLF is heavily concentrated in Financial Services (98.21%), while XLK is exclusively focused on the Technology sector (100%).
How has XLK performed year-to-date compared to XLF?+
XLK has significantly outperformed XLF year-to-date, with a return of 36.41% versus XLF's -1.36%.
Which is more volatile, XLF or XLK?+
XLK has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 18, 2026, XLF's annualized volatility was 13.6% and XLK's 22.9%, measured from daily closing prices.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of XLF vs XLK is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 18, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.