Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins due to superior momentum and growth-oriented sector exposure, outperforming SPY on a year-to-date and longer-term basis. While SPY offers broader diversification and a lower expense ratio, QQQ's concentration in technology and communication services has driven stronger returns, particularly in the current market environment. QQQ's higher trailing returns across multiple timeframes, including 1-year and 10-year periods, highlight its ability to capture upside in growth sectors. SPY's advantage lies in its lower cost and wider sector representation, making it a more stable, albeit less dynamic, investment. For investors prioritizing growth and willing to accept higher sector concentration risk, QQQ presents a more compelling option. SPY remains a solid choice for broad market exposure and lower fees, but QQQ's momentum is the deciding factor in this head-to-head comparison.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between SPY and QQQ is their sector focus and resulting performance profile. QQQ's heavy concentration in technology and growth sectors has driven superior momentum and longer-term returns, making it the choice for investors seeking aggressive growth. SPY, conversely, offers broad market diversification across all sectors, providing a more stable, albeit less explosive, investment. This fundamental difference in portfolio construction dictates their respective risk-reward trade-offs and performance characteristics.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for QQQ remains positive, contingent on continued strength in technology and growth sectors. If these sectors maintain their upward trajectory and benefit from favorable macroeconomic conditions, QQQ is likely to continue outperforming SPY. However, any significant rotation out of growth or increased regulatory scrutiny on tech giants could lead to underperformance. SPY's outlook is tied to the broader economic cycle. In a stable or moderately growing economy, SPY should provide steady returns. In a downturn, its diversification may offer some downside protection, but it will likely still experience losses. The Federal Reserve's monetary policy and inflation trends will be key factors influencing both ETFs.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | SPY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $629.28 - $779.37 | $555.60 - $748.65 |
| Prev. Close | $757.83 | $708.69 |
| Market Cap | 656.00B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 45.48M | 26.60M |
QQQ's valuation is inherently tied to its growth-oriented holdings, which currently command higher multiples. QQQ's sector composition, heavily weighted towards technology, suggests a premium valuation. SPY, with its broader diversification across all market sectors, presents a more balanced valuation profile. QQQ's higher year-to-date return of 16.99% compared to SPY's 13.07% indicates that investors are currently willing to pay a premium for QQQ's exposure to growth areas. SPY's lower expense ratio of 0.095% versus QQQ's 0.18% also contributes to its overall value proposition for cost-conscious investors. The net assets of SPY ($811.9B) are significantly larger than QQQ's ($489.0B), reflecting its status as the broader market benchmark.
Market Performance
| Metric | SPY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 12.34% | 19.71% |
| 24h Range | $763.60 - $766.38 | $713.63 - $717.63 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 48.6 | 51.1 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
QQQ has shown higher recent volatility (19.7%) compared to SPY (12.3%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | SPY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.64 | 51.13 |
| 50-Day MA | $758.62 | $710.41 |
| 200-Day MA | $714.23 | $660.14 |
QQQ exhibits slightly stronger current momentum with an RSI of 51.13 and a positive MACD of 0.67, indicating it is trading above its 50-day ($710.41) and 200-day ($660.14) moving averages. SPY, while also trading above its key averages (SMA 50: $758.62, SMA 200: $714.23), shows a more neutral RSI of 48.64 and a slightly higher MACD of 1.05. Both ETFs are trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages (QQQ: $714.28, SPY: $765.02), suggesting some short-term consolidation. QQQ's stochastic indicator at 56.84 is in a more favorable mid-range compared to SPY's 40.99, suggesting more room for upside momentum. SPY's price is currently closer to its 52-week high ($779.37) than QQQ ($748.65), but QQQ's overall technical setup points to a stronger upward trend.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
SPY
Technical Score: 75/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 78/100
As both SPY and QQQ are broad market ETFs, they do not have individual analyst ratings or median target prices. Sentiment must be inferred from their price action and historical performance. QQQ's higher trailing returns, particularly its outperformance in the 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, suggest a positive market sentiment towards its growth-oriented holdings. SPY, as the benchmark S&P 500 ETF, generally reflects overall market sentiment. The fact that QQQ has outperformed SPY year-to-date and over longer periods indicates a prevailing preference for growth stocks, which dominate QQQ's portfolio. Investor demand, as evidenced by net assets, shows SPY ($811.9B) is larger than QQQ ($489.0B), indicating broader market participation in SPY.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | SPY | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.69 |
The primary risk for QQQ is its significant concentration in the technology sector (59.15%), making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns or regulatory changes impacting big tech. Its growth-oriented nature also means it could underperform in a rising interest rate environment or a rotation out of growth stocks. SPY's risk lies in its broad diversification; while this reduces single-sector risk, it also means its performance is tied to the overall economic cycle and may lag during periods of strong growth in specific sectors. SPY's higher expense ratio (0.095%) compared to some other broad market ETFs, though lower than QQQ's (0.18%), represents a drag on returns. Both ETFs are subject to market risk, but QQQ carries higher concentration risk.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider QQQ if your investment horizon aligns with capturing growth in technology and communication services, accepting the associated sector concentration risk.
- SPY remains a core holding for broad market exposure and diversification, offering a lower cost basis and a more stable return profile.
- Evaluate your personal risk tolerance and investment goals; QQQ is suited for growth-oriented investors, while SPY is better for those seeking stability and broad market representation.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
SPY
Current: $764.29
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$726.08
Aggressive
$764.29
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$704.29
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$762.38
+10%
$798.68
+15%
$834.99
QQQ
Current: $714.88
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$679.14
Aggressive
$714.88
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$658.76
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$713.09
+10%
$747.05
+15%
$781.01
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, SPY or QQQ?+
QQQ is currently a better buy for investors prioritizing growth and momentum, driven by its technology sector concentration and superior YTD and longer-term returns. SPY remains a solid choice for broad market exposure and lower fees, but QQQ's performance edge is significant.
What are the key risks for SPY versus QQQ?+
QQQ's main risk is its heavy concentration in technology, making it susceptible to sector-specific downturns. SPY's risk is its broad diversification, which can lead to lagging performance in strong growth periods, though it offers more stability.
Which ETF has a lower expense ratio?+
SPY has a lower expense ratio of 0.095% compared to QQQ's 0.18%. This means investors pay less in fees for SPY, which can compound over time.
How do their trailing returns compare?+
QQQ has demonstrated stronger trailing returns across multiple timeframes, including 1-year (26.35% vs 20.26%), 5-year (14.23% vs 12.69%), and 10-year (20.78% vs 15.27%) periods, indicating its growth focus has been more rewarding.
What are the main sectors represented in each ETF?+
QQQ is heavily concentrated in Technology (59.15%) and Communication Services (12.7%). SPY offers broader diversification with Technology at 38.69%, followed by Financial Services (12.06%) and Communication Services (9.5%).
How does their dividend yield compare?+
SPY offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 0.98% compared to QQQ's yield of about 0.42%, making SPY more attractive for income-focused investors.
Which ETF has more net assets?+
SPY has significantly more net assets ($811.9 billion) than QQQ ($489.0 billion), reflecting its status as the primary benchmark ETF for the broader U.S. stock market.