TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

D-Wave Quantum vs Quantum Computing

Stock·NYSE

D-Wave Quantum Inc. QBTS

$11.78 ▼ 8.08%
Sell
25 / 100 AI score
Full QBTS analysis →
vs

Stock·NASDAQ

Quantum Computing Inc. QUBT

$6.36 ▼ 7.02%
Sell
39 / 100 AI score
Full QUBT analysis →
01

The short version

How QBTS and QUBT compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

QBTS and QUBT on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours QUBT
QBTS QUBT
25/100 AI score 39/100
-69.3% 1-year change -65.3%
72.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 64.0%
26.4 RSI (14-day) 29.2
0.00% Dividend yield 0.00%
The verdict
QUBT wins this head-to-head comparison, driven by significantly stronger recent revenue growth and a more favorable analyst sentiment, despite both companies operating at a loss and facing considerable technical headwinds. QUBT's revenue growth of 9000% dwarfs QBTS's -0.6%, offering a clear differentiator in top-line expansion. While both stocks are trading well below their 52-week highs and exhibit negative profitability metrics, QUBT's recent earnings surprises and higher median analyst target suggest a greater potential for recovery and upside. QUBT's current price of $6.36 is closer to its 52-week low of $6.08 than QBTS's price of $11.78 is to its $11.35 low, indicating a more beaten-down valuation that could attract value-oriented investors if performance improves. However, the current momentum favors QUBT due to its recent positive price action following earnings and a higher concentration of 'Buy' ratings from analysts.
Key difference
QUBT's exceptional revenue growth rate of 9000% is the decisive factor separating it from QBTS, which is experiencing negative revenue growth. This dramatic top-line expansion, coupled with QUBT's more contained losses and a higher concentration of 'Buy' ratings from analysts, presents a more compelling narrative for potential turnaround and future growth, despite both companies currently operating at a loss.
Outlook
The outlook for both QBTS and QUBT is highly speculative, contingent on a significant turnaround in their profitability and operational efficiency. For QUBT, the next 6-12 months will be critical to see if its aggressive revenue growth can translate into positive earnings and if analysts' optimism is justified. A failure to show progress could lead to a sharp decline from its current oversold technical levels. For QBTS, the outlook is more challenging due to negative revenue growth; a recovery would likely require a fundamental shift in strategy or market conditions, making its path to improvement less clear than QUBT's. In a bullish scenario, QUBT could see a significant re-rating driven by continued revenue expansion and a path to profitability, potentially reaching its median analyst target. QBTS might benefit from a broad market rally, but its fundamental issues suggest limited upside without a significant catalyst. In a bearish scenario, both stocks could continue their downward trend, with QBTS potentially facing deeper losses due to its negative revenue growth, while QUBT's growth story could falter if profitability remains elusive.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
QBTS QUBT

Over 1 year: QBTS lost 73.7% and QUBT lost 70.0%, a gap of 3.7 points in QUBT's favour.

03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

QBTS QUBT
$4.5B Market cap $1.4B
360x Price / sales 147x
4.0x Price / book 0.9x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

QBTS QUBT
-0.6% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +9,000.0%
-2,001.6% Net margin -152.5%
-28.0% Return on equity -1.5%
-10.7% Return on assets -4.2%
0.04 Debt / equity 0.01
On valuation
QUBT presents a more compelling valuation case, trading at $6.36, which is only slightly above its 52-week low of $6.08. This suggests that the market has already priced in significant negative factors, offering a potentially higher risk-reward profile for recovery. In contrast, QBTS trades at $11.78, closer to its 52-week low of $11.35, but its market capitalization of $4.47 billion is substantially larger than QUBT's $1.44 billion. Both companies have 'N/A' for P/E ratios, indicating they are not currently profitable on a per-share basis. QUBT's aggressive revenue growth, despite current losses, offers a more attractive growth-at-a-reasonable-price (GARP) narrative if it can achieve profitability, whereas QBTS's negative revenue growth raises concerns about its underlying business trajectory.
On profitability
Both QBTS and QUBT are currently loss-making entities with significantly negative profitability metrics. QBTS exhibits a net profit margin of -2001.59%, a return on equity of -27.99%, and a return on assets of -10.65%. QUBT, while also unprofitable, shows less severe negative margins with a net profit margin of -152.45%, a return on equity of -1.51%, and a return on assets of -4.16%.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

QBTS

Beat the estimate in 3 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 1 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Nov '24May '25Nov '25Aug '26

QUBT

Beat the estimate in 5 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 0 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Nov '24May '25Nov '25Aug '26
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

QBTS QUBT
25/100 AI score 39/100
26.4 RSI (14-day) 29.2
-31.4% Price against 50-day average -22.6%
-41.6% Price against 200-day average -29.3%
Technicals
Both QBTS and QUBT are exhibiting significantly oversold technical conditions, trading well below their key moving averages. QBTS's RSI is 26.39 and its Stochastic is 7.34, both indicating strong selling pressure and potential for a bounce. Similarly, QUBT's RSI is 29.2 and its Stochastic is 10.18, also pointing to oversold territory. QBTS's 20-day EMA is $14.84, significantly above its current price of $11.78, and its 50-day SMA is $17.16. QUBT's 20-day EMA is $7.56, also well above its current price of $6.36, with its 50-day SMA at $8.21. Despite both being technically weak, QUBT's recent price action shows a slight uptick following its latest earnings report, whereas QBTS has seen a more consistent decline, suggesting QUBT may be closer to a bottom.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment strongly favors QUBT, with 4 'Buy' ratings and 2 'Hold' ratings, and no 'Sell' or 'Strong Sell' recommendations, giving it a median target of $18. QBTS, on the other hand, has a more mixed analyst view, with 14 'Buy' ratings but also 2 'Hold' ratings, and a significantly higher median target of $36. However, the sheer number of analysts covering QBTS versus QUBT, combined with QUBT's higher concentration of 'Buy' ratings relative to its current price, suggests a more immediate positive catalyst potential for QUBT. The stark difference in median targets, despite QUBT's lower current price, indicates analysts see substantial upside for QUBT.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

QBTS QUBT
72.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 64.0%
2.17 Beta against the S&P 500 3.75
1.51 Sharpe ratio 1.35
Risk
The primary risk for both QBTS and QUBT is their continued inability to achieve profitability, as evidenced by their negative net profit margins and returns on equity/assets. QBTS faces the additional risk of its negative revenue growth, which could indicate a shrinking business or intense competitive pressure. Its significantly larger market capitalization, coupled with its significant losses, makes it more vulnerable to a substantial revaluation if market sentiment shifts. QUBT's main risk lies in its extremely high revenue growth percentage, which, while positive, could be unsustainable or indicative of a very small starting base; a failure to convert this growth into actual profits would be a major concern. Both stocks are trading significantly below their 52-week highs, highlighting substantial downside risk already realized.
ProTips
  1. Monitor QUBT's ability to convert its exceptional revenue growth into positive net income; any signs of slowing growth or widening losses could trigger a sharp sell-off.
  2. Consider QBTS only if it shows a clear turnaround in revenue growth and profitability metrics; its current trajectory is concerning despite a higher analyst target.
  3. Both stocks are technically oversold, presenting a potential short-term trading opportunity for a bounce, but the underlying fundamental risks remain significant for both.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

Thousands of paths from each price history: the median and the 90th percentile for each.

202620282030203220342036
QBTS median QBTS 90th QUBT median QUBT 90th
QBTS QUBT
$2,051 Downside, 2036 (10th) $4,014
$15,559 Base case, 2036 (median) $30,452
$118,041 Upside, 2036 (90th) $231,029

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in QBTS grows to about $15,600 and $10,000 in QUBT to about $30,500 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
QBTS
Current: $11.78
ENTRY ZONES
$12.02
$11.78
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$12.38
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$11.19
-10% from current
$10.60
-15% from current
$10.01
QUBT
Current: $6.36
ENTRY ZONES
$6.49
$6.36
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$6.68
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$6.04
-10% from current
$5.72
-15% from current
$5.41
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (QBTS). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices.

Note: The AI favored QUBT based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do QBTS and QUBT compare on profitability?+
Both companies are unprofitable, but QUBT shows less severe negative margins with a net profit margin of -152.45% compared to QBTS's -2001.59%. QUBT's return on equity and assets are also less negative, indicating better management of its current losses.
What is the technical outlook for QBTS and QUBT?+
Both stocks are technically oversold with low RSI and Stochastic readings, suggesting a potential for a short-term bounce. QBTS's 20-day EMA is $14.84 and QUBT's is $7.56, both well above their current prices, indicating significant overhead resistance.
How do analyst ratings compare for QBTS and QUBT?+
Analyst sentiment favors QUBT, with a higher concentration of 'Buy' ratings relative to its current price and a median target of $18. QBTS has a higher median target of $36 but also carries 'Hold' ratings, suggesting a more divided analyst opinion.
How has recent earnings performance differed between QBTS and QUBT?+
QUBT has shown consistent positive earnings surprises in its last three reports, including a 20% beat in its most recent quarter. QBTS also had a recent positive surprise but shows a widening loss trend, whereas QUBT's losses have been more contained.
Which is more volatile, QBTS or QUBT?+
QBTS has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 17, 2026, QBTS's annualized volatility was 72.0% and QUBT's 64.0%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do QBTS and QUBT move together?+
Yes, closely: over roughly the past year to October 17, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +0.85 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both adds little diversification.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of QBTS vs QUBT is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 17, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.