Jump to any asset
IonQ vs D-Wave Quantum
VS
Comparative Analysis
IONQ wins due to superior revenue growth and a more favorable analyst outlook, despite both companies facing technical headwinds and profitability challenges. IONQ's revenue growth stands at a remarkable 286.8%, significantly outpacing QBTS's contraction of 0.6%. While both stocks exhibit weak technical indicators, IONQ's analyst consensus leans more positive with a median target price of $67.50, nearly double its current price, compared to QBTS's median target of $36.00. IONQ's recent earnings performance, though mixed, shows a history of positive surprises, whereas QBTS has consistently missed estimates. The key differentiator lies in IONQ's ability to scale revenue rapidly in a nascent market, a critical factor for long-term success in the quantum computing space.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between IONQ and QBTS is IONQ's exceptional revenue growth rate of 286.8%, which is a critical indicator of market adoption and scaling potential in the nascent quantum computing industry. While QBTS shows a negative revenue growth, IONQ's ability to rapidly expand its top line, coupled with a more optimistic analyst target price, positions it as the stronger contender for future growth, despite current technical and profitability hurdles.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for IONQ is cautiously optimistic, driven by its substantial revenue growth and strong analyst backing, suggesting potential for significant upside if it can maintain its scaling trajectory and improve profitability. The current technical weakness presents a potential entry point for long-term investors. For QBTS, the outlook is more uncertain, with negative revenue growth and consistent earnings misses posing significant challenges. While its technicals show oversold conditions, a fundamental turnaround is required to justify a bullish stance. A scenario where IONQ continues its growth path while QBTS struggles to find its footing seems plausible over the next 6-12 months.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | IONQ | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 99.33 | -15.02 |
| Market Cap | 14.93B | 6.20B |
| Price/Sales | 62.69 | 529.66 |
| Price/Book | 4.37 | 6.07 |
| EV/EBITDA | -16.86 | -37.74 |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
IONQ trades at a Price-to-Earnings ratio of 99.33, reflecting high growth expectations, while QBTS's P/E is not applicable due to its current earnings status. IONQ's market capitalization is $14.93 billion, substantially larger than QBTS's $6.20 billion. Both companies are trading below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating bearish technical sentiment. IONQ's price is currently $36.84, closer to its 52-week low of $25.89 than its high of $84.64. QBTS is priced at $16.66, also closer to its 52-week low of $12.75 than its high of $46.75. Neither stock presents a compelling valuation based on current earnings multiples.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | IONQ | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 286.80% | -0.60% |
| Profit Margin | 40.40% | 82.59% |
| Return on Equity | -60.48% | -27.99% |
| Return on Assets | -14.47% | -10.65% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.63 | 4.44 |
IONQ boasts a significantly higher net profit margin of 40.4% compared to QBTS's 82.59%. However, both companies exhibit negative returns on equity and assets, indicating overall unprofitability. IONQ's return on equity is -60.48% and return on assets is -14.47%. QBTS's return on equity stands at -27.99% and return on assets at -10.65%. The stark difference in net profit margin, with QBTS showing a positive figure while IONQ shows a negative one, requires further investigation into their accounting practices, but overall profitability remains a challenge for both.
Earnings Reality Check
IONQ
Last 3 Qs: IONQ beat estimates 1x out of 3. Rose 1x after beats.
QBTS
Last 3 Qs: QBTS beat estimates 1x out of 3. Fell 1x after beats. (Sell the news?)
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | IONQ | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 40.26 | 40.00 |
| 50-Day MA | $40.39 | $18.93 |
| 200-Day MA | $44.11 | $21.44 |
Both IONQ and QBTS are exhibiting bearish technical signals, trading below their key moving averages. IONQ's RSI is at 40.26 and its MACD is negative at -1.06, indicating weak momentum. QBTS's RSI is at 40 and its MACD is also negative at -0.80. IONQ's 50-day SMA is $40.39 and its 200-day SMA is $44.11, with the current price below both. QBTS's 50-day SMA is $18.93 and its 200-day SMA is $21.44, also with the current price below these averages. QBTS's stochastic indicator is particularly low at 10.67, suggesting oversold conditions, while IONQ's stochastic is at 0.63, indicating a more neutral position but still below the typical buy signal threshold.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
IONQ
Technical Score: 73/100
QBTS
Technical Score: 21/100
Why the ratings differ: QBTS currently scores poorly on technical momentum (price sitting below key moving averages), while the analyst view below reflects forward-looking estimates of the business. A stock can be technically weak and still carry bullish analyst targets: the two measure different things over different horizons.
Analyst sentiment strongly favors IONQ, with a median target price of $67.50, representing a significant upside from its current price and a consensus of 'Strong Buy 1 / Buy 9 / Hold 2'. QBTS also has a 'Strong Buy 1 / Buy 15 / Hold 1' rating, but its median target price of $36.00 offers less relative upside from its current price. The number of analysts covering QBTS (17) is higher than for IONQ (12). Despite IONQ's current technical weakness, the analyst community appears more optimistic about its future prospects.Risk Stratification
| Metric | IONQ | QBTS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 3.30 | 2.14 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 1.51 |
A primary risk for IONQ is its current trading price being significantly below its 52-week high, suggesting potential investor skepticism despite strong revenue growth. The negative return on equity and assets also highlight ongoing profitability challenges. For QBTS, the risk lies in its negative revenue growth and consistent earnings misses, which could signal fundamental business issues. Its price is also trading well below its 52-week high, indicating a lack of investor confidence. Both companies operate in a highly competitive and capital-intensive sector, making execution and technological advancement critical.
Comparative ProTips
- Focus on IONQ's revenue growth as the primary driver for its investment thesis.
- Monitor QBTS's ability to reverse its negative revenue trend and achieve consistent earnings beats.
- Consider the significant analyst target upside for IONQ as a potential catalyst, while acknowledging current technical weakness.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
IONQ
Current: $36.84
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$35.00
Aggressive
$36.84
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$33.95
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$36.75
+10%
$38.50
+15%
$40.25
QBTS
Current: $16.66
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$15.83
Aggressive
$16.66
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$15.35
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$16.62
+10%
$17.41
+15%
$18.20
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (IONQ). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices. Note: The AI favored IONQ based on growth trajectory. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock, IONQ or QBTS, offers better growth prospects?+
IONQ demonstrates superior growth prospects with a revenue growth rate of 286.8%, significantly outpacing QBTS's negative 0.6% revenue growth. This indicates stronger market adoption and scaling potential for IONQ.
What are the key risks associated with investing in IONQ and QBTS?+
Key risks for IONQ include its price trading significantly below its 52-week high and ongoing profitability challenges. For QBTS, risks involve negative revenue growth, consistent earnings misses, and a price also well below its 52-week high.
How do the valuations of IONQ and QBTS compare?+
IONQ has a P/E of 99.33 and a market cap of $14.93 billion, while QBTS's P/E is not applicable. Both stocks are trading below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, suggesting current overvaluation or bearish sentiment.
What is the analyst sentiment towards IONQ versus QBTS?+
Analyst sentiment favors IONQ, with a median target price of $67.50 and a 'Strong Buy' consensus, indicating significant upside potential. QBTS has a median target of $36.00, offering less relative upside.
How have IONQ and QBTS performed in their recent earnings reports?+
IONQ had a strong earnings beat in May 2026, but its latest report met estimates. QBTS has consistently missed earnings estimates, although its stock saw a positive reaction to its most recent miss.
What are the profitability metrics for IONQ and QBTS?+
While QBTS shows a higher net profit margin (82.59%) than IONQ (40.4%), both companies exhibit negative returns on equity and assets, indicating overall unprofitability.
What do the technical indicators suggest for IONQ and QBTS?+
Technical indicators for both stocks are weak, with prices below key moving averages and negative MACD readings. QBTS shows particularly oversold conditions based on its stochastic indicator.