TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

Walmart vs Target

Stock·NASDAQ

Walmart Inc. WMT

$118.82 ▲ 0.80%
Sell
21 / 100 AI score
Full WMT analysis →
vs

Stock·NYSE

Target Corp. TGT

$156.63 ▲ 0.85%
Hold
55 / 100 AI score
Full TGT analysis →
01

The short version

How WMT and TGT compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

WMT and TGT on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours TGT
WMT TGT
21/100 AI score 55/100
+11.6% 1-year change +73.9%
24.8% Volatility (30d, yearly) 24.6%
73.0 RSI (14-day) 52.3
41.2x P/E ratio 15.8x
0.83% Dividend yield 2.92%
The verdict
Target (TGT) wins this head-to-head comparison against Walmart (WMT) due to superior profitability margins and a more attractive valuation, despite WMT's larger market presence and broader analyst consensus. TGT's net profit margin stands at 4.08% compared to WMT's 3%, indicating better efficiency in converting revenue to profit. Both retailers show positive revenue growth and strong returns on equity, but TGT's combination of better margins, lower valuation, and higher income makes it the preferred choice for investors prioritizing profitability and value.
Key difference
Target's (TGT) superior profitability margins and significantly more attractive valuation metrics are the key differentiators in this comparison. TGT's net profit margin of 4.08% and P/E ratio of 15.79 stand in stark contrast to WMT's 3% net profit margin and 41.21 P/E ratio. This suggests TGT is a more efficient operator and a better value proposition for investors seeking earnings power at a lower price.
Outlook
The outlook for both Walmart (WMT) and Target (TGT) is cautiously optimistic, with TGT presenting a more compelling risk-reward profile. For TGT, continued strong execution on its profitability and margin improvements could see its stock price appreciate towards its median analyst target of $164, especially if consumer spending remains resilient. A potential scenario involves TGT leveraging its efficiency gains to further boost shareholder returns. For WMT, maintaining its current upward technical trend and broad analyst backing could support its price, but its high valuation presents a significant hurdle. A scenario where WMT struggles to meet elevated growth expectations could lead to a valuation reset. Overall, TGT's current valuation and profitability suggest a clearer path to outperformance in the next 6-12 months.
NEXT · 2Price, side by side →
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
WMT TGT

Over 1 year: WMT gained 9.9% and TGT gained 76.1%, a gap of 66.1 points in TGT's favour.

NEXT · 3Valuation and profitability →
03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

WMT TGT
$938.0B Market cap $71.2B
41.2x P/E ratio 15.8x
1.3x Price / sales 0.7x
9.5x Price / book 4.0x
22.8x EV / EBITDA 9.9x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

WMT TGT
+5.9% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +5.3%
3.0% Net margin 4.1%
22.3% Return on equity 26.4%
6.4% Return on assets 5.7%
0.72 Debt / equity 1.08
On valuation
Target (TGT) presents a more compelling valuation than Walmart (WMT). TGT trades at a P/E ratio of 15.79, significantly lower than WMT's P/E of 41.21, suggesting TGT is cheaper relative to its earnings. Both companies have positive revenue growth, with TGT at 5.3% and WMT at 5.9%. TGT's price is currently trading slightly below its 50-day simple moving average of $157.34, indicating some recent weakness, while WMT is trading above its 50-day SMA of $108.91 and its 200-day SMA of $118.27, suggesting a stronger current technical uptrend. However, TGT's price is well above its 52-week low of $83.44, and WMT is also trading above its 52-week low of $98.88. The median analyst target for TGT is $164, offering a modest upside from its current price of $156.63, while WMT's median target is $127, which is above its current price of $118.815.
On profitability
Target (TGT) exhibits superior profitability compared to Walmart (WMT). TGT boasts a net profit margin of 4.08% and a return on equity of 26.41%, both exceeding WMT's figures of 3% net profit margin and 22.31% return on equity. TGT's return on assets at 5.69% is also slightly better than WMT's 6.41%. These metrics indicate that TGT is more effective at converting its revenue into profit and generating returns for its shareholders relative to its asset base and equity.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

WMT

Beat the estimate in 4 of 6 reports; fell the next session after 3 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Aug '25Feb '26Aug '26

TGT

Beat the estimate in 5 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 4 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Nov '24May '25Nov '25Aug '26
NEXT · 4Momentum and sentiment →
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

WMT TGT
21/100 AI score 55/100
73.0 RSI (14-day) 52.3
+9.1% Price against 50-day average -0.4%
+0.5% Price against 200-day average +19.2%
Technicals
Walmart (WMT) displays stronger current technical momentum than Target (TGT). WMT's RSI is at a strong 72.98, indicating strong upward momentum nearing overbought territory, and its MACD is positive at 2.25. WMT is trading comfortably above its 50-day SMA ($108.91) and 200-day SMA ($118.27), confirming an uptrend. In contrast, TGT's RSI is at a more neutral 52.29, and its MACD is negative at -0.70, suggesting weaker momentum. TGT is trading below its 50-day SMA ($157.34) but above its 200-day SMA ($131.35), indicating a mixed technical picture. WMT's stochastic indicator is in overbought territory at 85.74, while TGT's is in neutral territory at 59.67.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment leans more positive towards Walmart (WMT) based on the number of 'Strong Buy' and 'Buy' ratings, although Target (TGT) has a higher proportion of 'Strong Buy' ratings relative to its total analyst coverage. WMT has 10 'Strong Buy' and 27 'Buy' ratings from 43 analysts, with zero 'Sell' ratings. TGT has 2 'Strong Buy' and 11 'Buy' ratings from 38 analysts, but also has 4 'Strong Sell' ratings and 21 'Hold' ratings. The median analyst target for WMT is $127, suggesting limited upside from its current price, while TGT's median target of $164 offers a clearer potential for appreciation.
NEXT · 5Risk and practical tips →
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

WMT TGT
24.8% Volatility (30d, yearly) 24.6%
0.58 Beta against the S&P 500 0.98
0.98 Sharpe ratio 0.26
Risk
For Walmart (WMT), a primary risk lies in its high valuation; a P/E of 41.21 leaves it vulnerable to significant pullbacks if growth expectations are not met or if market sentiment shifts. Intense competition within the retail sector also poses a constant threat. Target (TGT) faces risks related to its operational execution, as evidenced by the mixed price reaction to its recent strong earnings beat. While TGT's profitability is superior, any slowdown in consumer spending could disproportionately impact its margins if it cannot maintain its efficiency. Also, TGT's dividend yield, while attractive, is significantly higher than WMT's, making it more sensitive to interest rate changes that could affect income-seeking investors.
ProTips
  1. Consider TGT for its value and income potential, but monitor its operational execution closely.
  2. WMT's strong technicals and broad analyst support suggest continued stability, but its high valuation warrants caution.
  3. Investors prioritizing profitability and a lower entry multiple should favor TGT, while those seeking a more established, albeit pricier, retail giant might lean towards WMT.
NEXT · 6Long-term scenarios →
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

NEXT · 7Trade plans for both →
07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
WMT
Current: $118.82
ENTRY ZONES
$121.19
$118.82
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$124.83
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$112.87
-10% from current
$106.93
-15% from current
$100.99
TGT
Current: $156.63
ENTRY ZONES
$159.76
$156.63
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$164.56
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$148.80
-10% from current
$140.97
-15% from current
$133.14
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored TGT based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
NEXT · 8Questions people ask →
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, WMT or TGT?+
TGT is a better buy due to its superior profitability and significantly lower valuation (P/E 15.79 vs 41.21). TGT also offers a higher dividend yield (2.92% vs 0.83%), making it more attractive for income-focused investors.
How do WMT and TGT compare on valuation?+
TGT is considerably cheaper, trading at a P/E of 15.79 compared to WMT's P/E of 41.21. Both companies show positive revenue growth, but TGT offers better value for its earnings.
Which stock offers a better dividend yield?+
TGT offers a substantially higher dividend yield of 2.92% compared to WMT's 0.83%, making it more appealing for investors seeking income.
How do their recent earnings reports compare?+
TGT delivered an exceptional earnings surprise of 75.64% in its latest quarter, significantly outperforming estimates, while WMT had a more modest 9.46% surprise.
What are the technical outlooks for WMT and TGT?+
WMT shows stronger technical momentum with an RSI of 72.98 and trading above key moving averages, indicating an uptrend. TGT's technicals are more mixed, with a neutral RSI of 52.29 and trading below its 50-day moving average.
How do their profitability metrics stack up?+
TGT is more profitable, with a net profit margin of 4.08% and a return on equity of 26.41%, both exceeding WMT's figures of 3% and 22.31% respectively.
NEXT · 9Keep exploring →

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of WMT vs TGT is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 16, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.