TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

AT&T vs Verizon Communications

Stock·NYSE

AT&T Inc. T

$23.40 ▲ 1.50%
Hold
55 / 100 AI score
Full T analysis →
vs

Stock·NYSE

Verizon Communications Inc. VZ

$44.40 ▼ 0.05%
Hold
50 / 100 AI score
Full VZ analysis →
01

The short version

How T and VZ compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

T and VZ on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours T
T VZ
55/100 AI score 50/100
-10.7% 1-year change +10.0%
44.3% Volatility (30d, yearly) 43.7%
41.0 RSI (14-day) 40.6
7.6x P/E ratio 11.3x
4.75% Dividend yield 6.34%
The verdict
T wins this head-to-head comparison, primarily driven by its superior valuation and stronger profitability metrics. While both telecom giants offer attractive dividend yields, T's lower P/E ratio and higher net profit margin present a more compelling investment case for value-oriented investors. VZ, despite a wider price range and a slightly better analyst sentiment, lags in key financial health indicators and valuation multiples.
Key difference
T's significantly lower P/E ratio and superior net profit margin are the decisive factors in this comparison. These metrics highlight T's more attractive valuation and better operational efficiency, making it the preferred choice for investors prioritizing value and profitability.
Outlook
The outlook for both T and VZ is cautiously neutral to slightly bearish in the short term, given their current technical positions below key moving averages. T's stronger valuation and profitability metrics provide a more solid foundation for a potential recovery. VZ's higher dividend yield remains attractive for income investors, but its wider price volatility presents a greater risk. Over the next 6-12 months, T is better positioned to outperform due to its fundamental strengths, assuming no major sector-wide disruptions.
NEXT · 2Price, side by side →
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
T VZ

Over 1 year: T lost 10.5% and VZ gained 9.5%, a gap of 20.0 points in VZ's favour.

NEXT · 3Valuation and profitability →
03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

T VZ
$157.9B Market cap $184.6B
7.6x P/E ratio 11.3x
1.2x Price / sales 1.3x
1.4x Price / book 1.7x
7.2x EV / EBITDA 7.3x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

T VZ
+2.3% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) -0.7%
16.9% Net margin 11.6%
18.3% Return on equity 15.8%
4.2% Return on assets 5.0%
1.29 Debt / equity 1.84
On valuation
T trades at a P/E ratio of 7.61, significantly lower than VZ's P/E of 11.34. This suggests that T is more attractively valued relative to its earnings. T's price is currently below its 20-day EMA ($24.09), 50-day SMA ($24.93), and 200-day SMA ($25.11), indicating a bearish short-to-medium term technical trend. Conversely, VZ's price is also below its 20-day EMA ($45.65), 50-day SMA ($47.88), and 200-day SMA ($46.60), also suggesting a bearish trend. However, T's lower P/E ratio makes it the clear winner on valuation.
On profitability
T's return on equity (ROE) stands at 18.34%, exceeding VZ's 15.84%. While both companies show solid returns on assets, T's higher net profit margin and ROE indicate better efficiency in converting revenue into profit and generating returns for shareholders.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

T

Beat the estimate in 2 of 3 reports; fell the next session after 1 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Jul '25Oct '25Jul '26

VZ

Beat the estimate in 6 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 2 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Oct '24Apr '25Oct '25Jul '26
NEXT · 4Momentum and sentiment →
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

T VZ
55/100 AI score 50/100
41.0 RSI (14-day) 40.6
-6.2% Price against 50-day average -7.3%
-6.8% Price against 200-day average -4.7%
Technicals
Both T and VZ are currently trading below their key moving averages (20-day EMA, 50-day SMA, 200-day SMA), suggesting bearish short-to-medium term trends for both. T's RSI is 41.02 and its CCI is -33.64, indicating some downward momentum. VZ's RSI is 40.55 and its CCI is -22.12, also showing bearish momentum. Neither stock is exhibiting strong bullish technical signals at this time, but T's slightly less negative technical indicators and its valuation advantage give it a slight edge.
Sentiment
VZ garners slightly more positive analyst sentiment, with 8 'Buy' and 3 'Strong Buy' ratings compared to T's 3 'Buy' and 3 'Strong Buy' ratings, although VZ has more 'Hold' ratings. VZ's median analyst target of $51 is also higher relative to its current price than T's median target of $29. However, T's strong analyst consensus suggests a generally positive view from the analyst community.
NEXT · 5Risk and practical tips →
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

T VZ
44.3% Volatility (30d, yearly) 43.7%
0.44 Beta against the S&P 500 0.25
0.30 Sharpe ratio 0.12
Risk
A primary risk for T is its current technical downtrend, with the price trading below its key moving averages, which could lead to further price depreciation if not reversed. VZ faces similar technical headwinds, but its wider 52-week trading range ($10.60 to $51.68) compared to T ($19.89 to $29.44) suggests potentially higher volatility and a greater risk of significant price swings. Both companies are subject to regulatory risks inherent in the telecommunications sector.
ProTips
  1. Consider T for its attractive valuation and solid profitability, especially if you are a value-oriented investor.
  2. Monitor the technicals for both T and VZ; a break above their respective 20-day EMAs could signal a short-term trend reversal.
  3. While VZ offers a higher dividend yield, T's overall financial health and valuation make it the more compelling long-term investment.
NEXT · 6Long-term scenarios →
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

NEXT · 7Trade plans for both →
07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
T
Current: $23.40
ENTRY ZONES
$22.23
$23.40
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$21.56
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$24.56
+10% from current
$25.73
+15% from current
$26.90
VZ
Current: $44.40
ENTRY ZONES
$42.18
$44.40
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$40.91
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$46.62
+10% from current
$48.84
+15% from current
$51.06
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored T based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
NEXT · 8Questions people ask →
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key risks for T vs VZ?+
Both stocks face risks from current technical downtrends. VZ has a wider 52-week range, suggesting potentially higher volatility and greater downside risk compared to T.
How do T and VZ compare on dividend yield?+
VZ offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 6.34% compared to T's yield of about 4.75%. Both provide substantial income, but VZ's yield is more attractive for income-focused investors.
What is the valuation difference between T and VZ?+
T is valued more attractively with a P/E ratio of 7.61, while VZ trades at a higher P/E of 11.34, indicating T is cheaper relative to its earnings.
How do their recent earnings perform?+
Both companies have recently beaten earnings estimates. T had a larger surprise percentage (10.17%) in its latest report, while VZ saw a better immediate price reaction (2.03%) to its beat.
Which is more volatile, T or VZ?+
They have been about equally volatile. Over the 30 days to October 16, 2026, T's annualized volatility was 44.3% and VZ's 43.7%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do T and VZ move together?+
Yes, closely: over roughly the past year to October 16, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +0.81 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both adds little diversification.
NEXT · 9Keep exploring →

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of T vs VZ is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 16, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.