Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
XLK wins this head-to-head comparison, exhibiting stronger recent momentum and a more favorable expense ratio, despite VGT's superior long-term performance. XLK's current price action shows a more positive trajectory, supported by its technical indicators, while VGT is trading closer to its 52-week high. However, XLK's slightly higher expense ratio is offset by its better performance in the shorter-term trailing returns. Investors seeking exposure to the technology sector will find XLK's current momentum a compelling factor, though VGT's long-term growth narrative remains intact.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between VGT and XLK is their performance across different time horizons and their expense ratios, with XLK offering a slightly lower cost and stronger recent momentum. While VGT boasts superior long-term returns (3, 10-year) and is trading closer to its 52-week high, XLK has outperformed in the 1-year and year-to-date periods and carries a marginally lower expense ratio. This suggests XLK may be capturing more current market enthusiasm within the technology sector, making it the preferred choice for investors prioritizing recent performance and cost efficiency.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both VGT and XLK remains positive, driven by continued innovation and adoption within the technology sector, though potential headwinds exist. XLK is expected to maintain its recent momentum, potentially benefiting from strong performance in its largest holdings. However, a slight pullback from its previous close suggests some near-term caution. VGT, while showing stronger long-term performance, faces the risk of a correction given its proximity to its 52-week high and overbought stochastic levels. Investors should be prepared for potential volatility, especially if interest rates rise or regulatory pressures on tech giants intensify.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $83.09 - $126.00 | $126.68 - $198.73 |
| Prev. Close | $119.63 | $187.87 |
| Market Cap | N/A | 43.68B |
| 24h Volume | 26.50K | 5.57M |
Instead, their 'valuation' is assessed through their price action relative to their 52-week ranges and their expense ratios. VGT is currently trading at $121.425, which is closer to its 52-week high of $126 than its low of $83.09. XLK, trading at $185.22, is also above its 52-week low of $126.68 but further from its high of $198.73. VGT's expense ratio is 0.09%, costing $90 per $10,000 invested annually, while XLK's is 0.08%, costing $80 per $10,000 invested annually. XLK offers a slightly lower cost of ownership.
Market Performance
| Metric | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 26.84% | 28.29% |
| 24h Range | $120.68 - $121.70 | $184.57 - $186.52 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 58.7 | 54.1 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~28%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.73 | 54.14 |
| 50-Day MA | $117.65 | $182.69 |
| 200-Day MA | $104.34 | $161.08 |
XLK exhibits mixed technical signals, with a neutral RSI of 54.14 and a positive MACD of 0.96, indicating some upward momentum. VGT, on the other hand, shows a stronger RSI of 58.73, suggesting more upward momentum, and a MACD of 0.79. Both ETFs are trading above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, confirming uptrends. VGT's stochastic reading of 89.67 indicates it is in overbought territory, while XLK's stochastic of 62.38 is in the upper range but not yet overbought. VGT is currently trading closer to its 52-week high, suggesting stronger recent price appreciation.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VGT
Technical Score: 78/100
XLK
Technical Score: 78/100
Sentiment for these technology ETFs is derived from their performance trends and sector context, as analyst ratings are not provided. Both VGT and XLK are heavily concentrated in the technology sector, which has seen significant investor interest. VGT's year-to-date return of 28.20% and XLK's 29.83% reflect positive sentiment towards technology stocks. The differing performance in trailing returns suggests shifts in investor preference between the two ETFs over various time horizons. XLK's recent outperformance in the 1-year trailing returns may indicate a current positive sentiment tilt towards its holdings.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VGT | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 0.78 |
The primary risk for both VGT and XLK lies in their heavy concentration within the technology sector, making them susceptible to sector-specific downturns and regulatory changes. VGT, with its higher concentration in technology stocks, faces greater risk from any adverse developments impacting major tech companies. Its proximity to its 52-week high also presents a risk of pullbacks if the market corrects. XLK, while also tech-heavy, has shown slightly more resilience in its current technical indicators, though its recent price decline from its previous close warrants monitoring. Both ETFs are exposed to macroeconomic factors such as interest rate changes and inflation, which can impact growth-oriented technology stocks.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider XLK if prioritizing recent performance and lower expense ratios in the technology sector.
- VGT remains a strong contender for investors with a longer time horizon seeking to capture its superior historical long-term growth.
- Monitor sector-specific news and macroeconomic factors, as both ETFs are highly sensitive to technology industry trends and interest rate movements.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $121.43
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$115.35
Aggressive
$121.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$111.89
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$121.12
+10%
$126.89
+15%
$132.66
XLK
Current: $185.22
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$175.96
Aggressive
$185.22
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$170.68
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$184.76
+10%
$193.55
+15%
$202.35
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored XLK based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, VGT or XLK?+
XLK is currently a better buy due to its stronger recent momentum and slightly lower expense ratio. While VGT has superior long-term returns, XLK's year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns indicate a more favorable current trend.
What are the key risks for VGT vs XLK?+
Both ETFs face significant risks due to their heavy concentration in the technology sector. XLK's recent price drop from its previous close and VGT's proximity to its 52-week high suggest potential for near-term volatility.
How do VGT and XLK compare on cost?+
XLK is cheaper to hold, with an expense ratio of 0.08% (costing $80 per $10,000 invested annually) compared to VGT's 0.09% (costing $90 per $10,000 invested annually).
Which ETF has better long-term performance?+
VGT has demonstrated better long-term performance, with superior trailing returns over the 3-year and 10-year periods compared to XLK.
Which ETF has better short-term performance?+
XLK has shown better short-term performance, outperforming VGT in the year-to-date and 1-year trailing return periods.
How concentrated are VGT and XLK in their sectors?+
Both ETFs are highly concentrated in the technology sector. VGT holds 99.15% in Technology, while XLK is 100% allocated to Technology.
What do the technical indicators suggest for VGT and XLK?+
VGT's technicals show stronger upward momentum with a higher RSI and stochastic nearing overbought territory. XLK's indicators are more neutral but still confirm an uptrend.