TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

ETF·NYSE

Vanguard Information Technology ETF VGT

$118.83 ▼ 2.87%
Hold
55 / 100 AI score
Full VGT analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF SCHG

$35.21 ▼ 2.00%
Buy
66 / 100 AI score
Full SCHG analysis →
01

The short version

How VGT and SCHG compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

VGT and SCHG on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours SCHG
VGT SCHG
55/100 AI score 66/100
+26.4% 1-year change +10.3%
22.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 16.3%
34.3 RSI (14-day) 38.5
The verdict
SCHG wins this head-to-head comparison against VGT, primarily driven by its superior valuation metrics and more favorable expense ratio. While both ETFs operate within the technology-heavy growth sector, SCHG offers a more cost-effective entry point and has demonstrated stronger long-term performance relative to its category, despite VGT's larger net assets. Investors seeking broad exposure to large-cap growth equities will find SCHG to be the more compelling choice based on current data.
Key difference
The most significant differentiator between VGT and SCHG is their expense ratio and associated cost to the investor. SCHG's expense ratio of 0.04% is less than half of VGT's 0.09%, making it a substantially cheaper option for long-term holding. This cost advantage, combined with SCHG's broader sector exposure beyond pure technology, positions it as the more efficient and potentially more resilient choice for investors.
Outlook
The outlook for both VGT and SCHG is currently cautious, reflecting the broader market's technical weakness and potential headwinds for growth stocks. SCHG may offer a more resilient path forward due to its lower cost structure and slightly better diversification, potentially outperforming VGT in a flat or moderately declining market. In a strong recovery scenario, VGT's concentrated tech bet could lead to sharper gains, but also increased volatility. Investors should monitor interest rate movements and sector rotation trends closely.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
VGT SCHG

Over 1 year: VGT gained 26.3% and SCHG gained 10.2%, a gap of 16.0 points in VGT's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

How big each is, where each trades in its year, and its trend.

VGT SCHG
$177.9B Size (net assets / market cap) $63.9B
$5.9M 24h volume $8.9M
75% Position in 52-week range 79%
-3.0% Price against 50-day average -1.5%
Reading
SCHG presents a more attractive valuation profile compared to VGT. SCHG's expense ratio is significantly lower at 0.04% versus VGT's 0.09%, translating to a cost of $4.00 per $10,000 invested for SCHG compared to $9.00 for VGT. This cost advantage is a critical factor for long-term investment performance. The lower expense ratio and SCHG's inception date in 2009 suggest a more mature and potentially more efficient fund structure for investors.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

VGT SCHG
55/100 AI score 66/100
34.3 RSI (14-day) 38.5
-3.0% Price against 50-day average -1.5%
+9.9% Price against 200-day average +5.7%
Technicals
Both VGT and SCHG are currently exhibiting weak technical momentum, trading below their 20-day and 50-day moving averages. SCHG's price of $35.21 is below its 50-day SMA of $35.75 and 20-day EMA of $36.08, with an RSI of 38.52, also suggesting weakness. Both ETFs show negative MACD values, reinforcing the current bearish technical trend.
Sentiment
Analyst ratings and median price targets are not available for either VGT or SCHG, preventing a direct assessment of Wall Street sentiment. The current market environment appears to be favoring caution for both technology-focused and broad growth ETFs.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

VGT SCHG
22.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 16.3%
0.98 Sharpe ratio 0.76
Risk
The primary risk for VGT is its extreme concentration in the Technology sector, making it highly susceptible to sector-specific downturns or regulatory changes impacting tech giants. SCHG, while also tech-heavy, offers slightly more diversification across other growth-oriented sectors, which could provide a marginal buffer against sector-wide shocks. Both ETFs are exposed to broader market volatility and interest rate sensitivity inherent in growth-oriented investments.
ProTips
  1. Consider SCHG for its lower cost and broader diversification, making it a more efficient choice for long-term growth investing.
  2. Given the current weak technicals for both ETFs, investors may want to wait for signs of a trend reversal or accumulation before entering new positions.
  3. While VGT offers concentrated tech exposure, its higher expense ratio and sector concentration present greater risks compared to SCHG's balanced approach.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $118.83
ENTRY ZONES
$112.89
$118.83
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$109.50
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$124.77
+10% from current
$130.71
+15% from current
$136.65
SCHG
Current: $35.21
ENTRY ZONES
$33.45
$35.21
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$32.45
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$36.97
+10% from current
$38.73
+15% from current
$40.49
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored SCHG based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is a better buy, VGT or SCHG?+
SCHG is the better buy due to its significantly lower expense ratio (0.04% vs 0.09%) and broader sector diversification, despite VGT's higher net assets. SCHG offers a more cost-effective entry into large-cap growth equities.
How do VGT and SCHG compare on cost?+
SCHG is considerably cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.04%, costing $4.00 per $10,000 invested annually. VGT has a higher expense ratio of 0.09%, costing $9.00 per $10,000 invested annually.
What is the sector exposure of VGT and SCHG?+
VGT is almost entirely concentrated in Technology (99.27%). SCHG also has a significant Technology weighting (54.29%) but includes exposure to other sectors like Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the net assets of VGT and SCHG?+
VGT has substantially larger net assets, standing at $177.93 billion, compared to SCHG's $63.85 billion. This indicates VGT is a more established and larger fund in terms of assets under management.
How have VGT and SCHG performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 17, 2026, VGT's price rose 26.4% and SCHG's rose 10.3%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, VGT or SCHG?+
VGT has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 17, 2026, VGT's annualized volatility was 22.0% and SCHG's 16.3%, measured from daily closing prices.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of VGT vs SCHG is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 17, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.