Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
SMH wins this head-to-head comparison due to its superior year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns, indicating stronger recent momentum. While VGT offers a lower expense ratio and broader technology exposure, SMH's focused approach on semiconductors has driven outsized performance. Investors prioritizing growth and recent performance trends will favor SMH, whereas those seeking lower costs and broader tech diversification may lean towards VGT. The choice hinges on whether to chase momentum or prioritize cost and breadth.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator is SMH's focused exposure to the high-growth, high-volatility semiconductor industry, which has driven superior recent momentum and returns. VGT offers broader diversification across the entire technology sector at a lower cost, making it a more stable, albeit less explosive, investment. The choice hinges on whether an investor prioritizes chasing strong, recent performance in a concentrated sector or opting for wider diversification and lower fees.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both VGT and SMH is generally positive, tied to the continued growth of the technology sector. SMH is expected to benefit from strong demand in areas like AI, high-performance computing, and automotive chips, potentially continuing its momentum. However, its concentrated nature exposes it to greater downside risk if the semiconductor cycle turns. VGT, with its broader diversification, is likely to see more stable, albeit potentially slower, growth aligned with the overall tech market, benefiting from trends across software, hardware, and services.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VGT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $83.09 - $126.00 | $301.37 - $671.83 |
| Prev. Close | $119.63 | $560.28 |
| Market Cap | N/A | 5.91B |
| 24h Volume | 26.50K | 119.88K |
Instead, their 'valuation' is assessed through their price action relative to their 52-week ranges. VGT is currently trading at $121.43, closer to its 52-week high of $126 than its low of $83.09. SMH is trading at $571.80, also closer to its 52-week high of $671.83 than its low of $301.37. Both ETFs show positive price momentum, but SMH's higher absolute price and significant gains over the past year suggest a stronger upward trajectory.
Market Performance
| Metric | VGT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 26.84% | 38.97% |
| 24h Range | $120.68 - $121.70 | $564.11 - $572.72 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 58.7 | 54.4 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
SMH has shown higher recent volatility (39.0%) compared to VGT (26.8%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VGT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.73 | 54.40 |
| 50-Day MA | $117.65 | $569.17 |
| 200-Day MA | $104.34 | $482.18 |
SMH exhibits stronger recent momentum, trading at $571.80 with an RSI of 54.4 and a CCI of 82.04, indicating a generally positive trend without being excessively overbought. Its 50-day SMA is $569.17, with the price currently trading just above it. VGT, trading at $121.43, shows an RSI of 58.74 and a CCI of 75.64, also suggesting a healthy uptrend. VGT's price is above its 50-day SMA of $117.65 and its 200-day SMA of $104.34. While both show upward technicals, SMH's higher absolute price and strong recent performance suggest more potent upward momentum.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VGT
Technical Score: 78/100
SMH
Technical Score: 78/100
Analyst ratings and median targets are not provided for either VGT or SMH. Sentiment must therefore be inferred from price action and trailing returns. SMH's significantly higher year-to-date return of 54.56% and 1-year return of 92.37% compared to VGT's YTD return of 28.20% and 1-year return of 38.99% strongly suggest positive investor sentiment and demand for semiconductor-focused investments. This outperformance indicates a favorable view of SMH's underlying holdings.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VGT | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 0.95 |
SMH's primary risk stems from its concentrated exposure to the semiconductor industry. This sector is highly cyclical and sensitive to global demand, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning chip manufacturing and trade. A downturn in semiconductor demand or increased regulatory scrutiny could significantly impact SMH's performance. VGT, while also exposed to technology, diversifies across a wider range of sub-sectors, mitigating some of the concentration risk inherent in SMH. However, VGT is still subject to broader technology sector downturns and macroeconomic headwinds.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider SMH if chasing strong recent momentum in the semiconductor space is the priority, but be prepared for higher volatility.
- VGT offers a lower-cost, more diversified approach to the technology sector, suitable for investors seeking broader exposure and stability.
- Monitor semiconductor supply chain dynamics and global demand trends closely when assessing SMH's future performance.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $121.43
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$115.35
Aggressive
$121.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$111.89
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$121.12
+10%
$126.89
+15%
$132.66
SMH
Current: $571.80
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$543.21
Aggressive
$571.80
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$526.91
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$570.37
+10%
$597.53
+15%
$624.69
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored SMH based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, VGT or SMH?+
SMH is currently showing stronger momentum with superior year-to-date and 1-year returns, making it a more attractive option for investors seeking recent performance. VGT offers broader diversification across the technology sector at a lower expense ratio.
What are the key risks for VGT versus SMH?+
SMH's main risk is its concentration in the cyclical semiconductor industry, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. VGT's risk is more diversified across the technology sector but still exposed to broader tech market corrections.
Which ETF has a lower expense ratio?+
VGT has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to SMH's 0.35%. This means VGT costs $9 per $10,000 invested annually, while SMH costs $35 per $10,000 invested annually.
How do their trailing returns compare?+
SMH has significantly outperformed VGT across multiple timeframes, especially over the last year (92.37% for SMH vs. 38.99% for VGT) and year-to-date (54.56% for SMH vs. 28.20% for VGT).
What is the sector concentration of each ETF?+
VGT is heavily concentrated in Technology, with 99.15% of its assets in the sector. SMH is even more concentrated, with 100% of its assets dedicated to the Technology sector, specifically semiconductors.
How do their net assets compare?+
VGT has substantially larger net assets under management at $169.38 billion, compared to SMH's $67.79 billion, suggesting broader investor adoption for VGT.
What is the outlook for technology ETFs like VGT and SMH?+
The outlook for technology ETFs remains generally positive, driven by ongoing digital transformation and AI advancements. However, SMH's semiconductor focus may lead to higher volatility, while VGT's broader exposure offers more stability.