TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

SPDR Gold Shares vs iShares Silver Trust

ETF·NYSE

SPDR Gold Shares GLD

$378.95 ▲ 0.34%
Sell
28 / 100 AI score
Full GLD analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

iShares Silver Trust SLV

$52.26 ▲ 0.27%
Sell
24 / 100 AI score
Full SLV analysis →
01

The short version

How GLD and SLV compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

CleaRank Financial AI favours GLD
GLD SLV
28/100 AI score 24/100
+0.4% 1-year change +19.1%
21.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 39.9%
43.4 RSI (14-day) 40.6
The verdict
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) comes out ahead on CleaRank's model, scoring 28/100 (Sell) against 24/100 (Sell) for iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The scores are close, and no single factor separates them by much.
Key difference
Size is the most obvious gap between the two funds. GLD has $141.7B in net assets, while SLV has $30.0B.
Outlook
GLD would need to regain its 50-day average at $395.87 and its 200-day at $414.64 to turn its downtrend. SLV would need to regain its 50-day average at $57.37 and its 200-day at $65.18 to turn its downtrend.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
GLD SLV

Over 1 year: GLD gained 0.5% and SLV gained 19.3%, a gap of 18.9 points in SLV's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

GLD SLV
$141.7B Size (net assets / market cap) $30.0B
$6.9M 24h volume $10.3M
13% Position in 52-week range 15%
-4.3% Price against 50-day average -8.9%
Reading
Holding GLD costs less than holding SLV. Its expense ratio is 0.40%, while SLV's is 0.50%. On a $10,000 holding, that works out to $40.00 a year for GLD and $50.00 for SLV. GLD is also the bigger fund, with $141.7B in net assets compared with $30.0B for SLV.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Indicators side by side

GLD SLV
28/100 AI score 24/100
43.4 RSI (14-day) 40.6
-4.3% Price against 50-day average -8.9%
-8.6% Price against 200-day average -19.8%
Technicals
GLD is in a downtrend, trading 4.27% below its 50-day average and 8.61% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 43.4, in the neutral zone, with the MACD line negative. SLV is in a downtrend, trading 8.91% below its 50-day average and 19.83% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 40.6, in the neutral zone, with the MACD line negative. SLV sits higher in its 52-week range, at 15% against 13% for GLD.
Sentiment
GLD fell 4.88% over the past month and fell 0.04% over three months. SLV fell 12.36% over the past month and fell 3.08% over three months.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, how much return each has paid for that risk, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk measures

GLD SLV
21.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 39.9%
0.92 Sharpe ratio 0.86
Risk
SLV moves more on an average day, 2.26% against 1.19% for GLD. Their worst falls in the price history were 26.4% for GLD (January 2026 to July 2026) and 52.4% for SLV (January 2026 to October 2026). On these measures together, SLV is the riskier of the two.
ProTips
  1. For GLD, watch the 20-day EMA at $383.16 above the price and the 52-week low at $360.12 below it.
  2. For SLV, watch the 20-day EMA at $53.92 above the price and the 52-week low at $41.70 below it.
  3. Costs compound: GLD charges $40.00 a year on $10,000 and SLV $50.00.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
GLD
Current: $378.95
ENTRY ZONES
$386.53
$378.95
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$398.12
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$360.00
-10% from current
$341.06
-15% from current
$322.11
SLV
Current: $52.26
ENTRY ZONES
$53.31
$52.26
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$54.90
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$49.65
-10% from current
$47.03
-15% from current
$44.42
Disclaimer
The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored GLD based on its price trend, on today's data.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GLD or SLV?+
On CleaRank's model GLD scores higher, 28/100 (Sell) against 24/100 (Sell) for SLV. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation.
Which has performed better over the past year, GLD or SLV?+
Over the past year SLV has performed better, with its price up 19.34% against a 0.45% rise for GLD.
Which is cheaper to own, GLD or SLV?+
Costs are lower for GLD, which carries an expense ratio of 0.40% compared with 0.50% for SLV.
Which is riskier, GLD or SLV?+
SLV is the riskier of the two on the measures we track. Average daily move: 1.19% for GLD, 2.26% for SLV. Worst fall in the price history: 26.4% for GLD, 52.4% for SLV.
Which has stronger momentum right now, GLD or SLV?+
GLD has the higher 14-day RSI, 43.4 (neutral) against 40.6 (neutral) for SLV. Both MACD lines are negative. Readings above 70 or below 30 mark stretched momentum.
Which fund is larger, GLD or SLV?+
GLD is the bigger fund. It holds $141.7B in net assets, while SLV holds $30.0B.
How would $10,000 have grown in GLD or SLV?+
Invested in October 2016, $10,000 would be worth $31,432 today in GLD and $31,303 in SLV.
Which is closer to its 52-week high, GLD or SLV?+
GLD is closer: it trades 25.65% below its 52-week high of $509.70, against 52.42% below $109.83 for SLV.
Are GLD and SLV in an uptrend?+
GLD is in a downtrend, trading 4.27% below its 50-day average and 8.61% below its 200-day. SLV is in a downtrend, trading 8.91% below its 50-day average and 19.83% below its 200-day.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of GLD vs SLV is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 22, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.