Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
SPDR Gold Shares vs iShares Gold Trust
VS
Comparative Analysis
IAU wins this head-to-head comparison due to its superior technical positioning and lower expense ratio, despite both ETFs tracking gold prices. IAU is currently trading closer to its 52-week low, indicating more room for potential upside compared to GLD, which is also showing oversold technical indicators. While both are subject to similar macroeconomic drivers, IAU's cost efficiency and slightly better recent performance in certain periods give it an edge for investors focused on tactical entry and long-term cost savings. GLD, while a well-established gold ETF, is currently trading below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, suggesting a weaker short-to-medium term trend. Its RSI and Stochastic indicators are significantly oversold, signaling potential for a bounce but also highlighting current weakness. IAU, though also oversold, is positioned slightly better relative to its own technical averages and 52-week range, making it the preferred choice for a tactical investment in gold.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between GLD and IAU is their expense ratio. IAU, with an expense ratio of 0.0025, is considerably cheaper to hold than GLD, which has an expense ratio of 0.004. This cost advantage, combined with IAU's slightly better technical positioning relative to its 52-week range, makes it the more compelling choice for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and tactical entry.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both GLD and IAU is heavily dependent on the trajectory of real interest rates and inflation expectations. If real rates continue to rise, gold prices could face further pressure, leading to potential declines for both ETFs. Conversely, if inflation proves persistent or geopolitical risks escalate, gold could see a resurgence as a safe-haven asset. In a scenario of falling real rates and elevated inflation, both ETFs could experience significant upside. However, IAU's lower cost structure positions it to capture more of that upside. A neutral environment with stable rates and moderate inflation might see both ETFs trade sideways, with IAU's lower fees still providing a slight edge.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | GLD | IAU |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $333.81 - $509.70 | $68.35 - $104.40 |
| Prev. Close | $392.84 | $81.71 |
| Market Cap | 112.77B | 85.44B |
| 24h Volume | 80.51K | 12.95M |
Instead, valuation is assessed through their price action relative to their 52-week ranges and moving averages. GLD is trading at $393.76, significantly below its 52-week high of $509.70 and above its low of $333.81. Its position is approximately 34% of the way up its 52-week range. IAU is trading at $80.54, also below its 52-week high of $104.40 and above its low of $68.35. Its position is approximately 31% of the way up its 52-week range. While both are in similar positions within their respective ranges, IAU's slightly lower percentage suggests it is marginally closer to its 52-week low, offering a potentially more attractive entry point for momentum-driven strategies.
Market Performance
| Metric | GLD | IAU |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 33.01% | 32.82% |
| 24h Range | $391.86 - $394.31 | $80.16 - $81.17 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 28.4 | 28.2 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~33%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both. RSI levels indicate oversold conditions, potentially signaling a reversal.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | GLD | IAU |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.35 | 28.17 |
| 50-Day MA | $391.51 | $80.25 |
| 200-Day MA | $416.00 | $85.23 |
GLD is exhibiting significant technical weakness, trading at $393.76, well below its 50-day SMA of $391.51 and its 200-day SMA of $415.99. Its Relative Strength Index (RSI) is at 28.35, firmly in oversold territory, and its Stochastic indicator is at 5.06, also significantly oversold. The MACD at 0.59 suggests a bearish trend. IAU is also showing oversold conditions, trading at $80.54, below its 50-day SMA of $80.25 and its 200-day SMA of $85.23. Its RSI is 28.17 and its Stochastic is 5.00, both indicating extreme oversold levels. The MACD at 0.12 is also bearish. While both are oversold, IAU's price is closer to its 50-day SMA than GLD's, suggesting it might be slightly better positioned for a short-term bounce, though both are in clear downtrends technically.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
GLD
Technical Score: 25/100
IAU
Technical Score: 70/100
Why the ratings differ: GLD currently scores poorly on technical momentum (price sitting below key moving averages), while the analyst view below reflects forward-looking estimates of the business. A stock can be technically weak and still carry bullish analyst targets: the two measure different things over different horizons.
As gold ETFs, GLD and IAU do not have analyst ratings or price targets. Sentiment is primarily driven by macroeconomic factors influencing gold prices, such as inflation expectations, interest rate movements, and geopolitical risks. Currently, the significantly oversold technical indicators across both ETFs suggest a prevailing bearish sentiment in the short term, with investors potentially anticipating a further decline or awaiting a clearer signal for a reversal.Risk Stratification
| Metric | GLD | IAU |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.05 | 1.06 |
The primary risk for both GLD and IAU is a significant increase in real interest rates, which typically makes non-yielding assets like gold less attractive. A strengthening US Dollar (DXY) also presents a headwind, as gold often moves inversely to the dollar. Also, a decrease in safe-haven demand due to improved global economic stability or resolution of geopolitical tensions could lead to outflows from gold ETFs. For GLD specifically, its higher expense ratio of 0.004 means that investors incur greater costs, which can erode returns, especially in flat or declining markets. IAU's lower expense ratio of 0.0025 offers a slight advantage in mitigating this cost-related risk. Both ETFs are also subject to tracking errors, though these are typically minimal for large, liquid gold ETFs.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider IAU for its lower expense ratio, which provides a cost advantage over GLD.
- Both ETFs are technically oversold; monitor for signs of a bullish reversal before entering long positions.
- Be aware of the inverse relationship between gold prices and real interest rates/US Dollar strength.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
GLD
Current: $393.76
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$374.07
Aggressive
$393.76
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$362.85
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$392.78
+10%
$411.48
+15%
$430.18
IAU
Current: $80.54
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$76.51
Aggressive
$80.54
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$74.22
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$80.34
+10%
$84.16
+15%
$87.99
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored IAU based on technical setup. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which gold ETF is a better buy, GLD or IAU?+
IAU is the preferred buy due to its lower expense ratio (0.0025 vs 0.004 for GLD) and slightly better technical positioning relative to its 52-week range. Both ETFs are currently exhibiting oversold technical indicators.
What are the key risks for GLD and IAU?+
The main risks include rising real interest rates, a strengthening US Dollar, and a decrease in safe-haven demand. GLD also carries the risk of higher holding costs due to its greater expense ratio.
How do GLD and IAU compare on expense ratios?+
IAU has a lower expense ratio of 0.0025, making it more cost-effective than GLD, which has an expense ratio of 0.004. This difference can impact long-term returns.
What is the current technical outlook for GLD?+
GLD is technically weak, trading below its key moving averages with significantly oversold RSI and Stochastic indicators, suggesting potential for a bounce but indicating a current downtrend.
What is the current technical outlook for IAU?+
IAU also shows oversold technicals, trading below its moving averages. While it may be slightly better positioned than GLD for a short-term bounce, it is also in a clear downtrend.
How do their 52-week ranges compare?+
GLD is approximately 34% of the way up its 52-week range, while IAU is approximately 31% of the way up. IAU is marginally closer to its 52-week low.
What macroeconomic factors influence GLD and IAU?+
Both ETFs are influenced by real interest rates, US Dollar strength, inflation expectations, and geopolitical events. Higher real rates and a stronger dollar are typically bearish for gold.