TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 849 assets, updated daily

Chipotle Mexican Grill vs Cava Group

CMG

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. NYSE

$31.59 ▼ 3.34%
VS

CAVA

Cava Group, Inc. NYSE

$53.64 ▼ 1.23%
Last updated: • CMG at $31.59, CAVA at $53.64
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) wins this head-to-head comparison against Cava Group (CAVA) due to its superior profitability and stronger fundamental metrics, despite Cava's higher revenue growth. CMG demonstrates significantly higher net profit margins (11.43% vs 4.82%) and return on equity (49.56% vs 8.32%), indicating a more efficient and profitable business model. While Cava boasts impressive revenue growth of 31.3% compared to CMG's 9.3%, CMG's established profitability and consistent earnings beats provide a more compelling investment case at this juncture. CMG's valuation, while not cheap, is more reasonable on a P/E basis (29.8 vs 94.7) than Cava's, suggesting better value for the earnings generated.

Key Differentiator

The decisive factor favoring Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) is its significantly superior profitability and efficiency. CMG's net profit margin of 11.43% and return on equity of 49.56% far exceed Cava Group's (CAVA) metrics of 4.82% and 8.32%, respectively. This demonstrates CMG's established ability to generate substantial profits and shareholder value, making it a more financially sound investment despite Cava's higher revenue growth.

Joint Outlook

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) is expected to continue its steady performance, driven by its strong brand, operational efficiency, and consistent earnings. The outlook remains positive, with potential for further margin expansion and steady revenue growth, though at a more mature pace. Cava Group (CAVA) faces a more mixed outlook; its high growth trajectory is attractive, but its elevated valuation and lower profitability present increased risk. If Cava can successfully execute its expansion plans and improve margins, it could see significant upside, but any stumbles could lead to a sharp correction. For the next 6-12 months, CMG is likely to offer more stable, albeit potentially slower, returns, supported by its profitability. CAVA offers higher potential reward but comes with substantially higher risk due to its valuation and growth dependency. Investors seeking stability may prefer CMG, while those with a higher risk tolerance and belief in Cava's growth story might favor CAVA.

Price Analysis Comparison

Valuation Metrics i

Valuation Metrics: CMG vs CAVA
Metric CMG CAVA
P/E Ratio 29.82 94.67
Market Cap 39.97B 6.27B
Price/Sales 3.31 4.43
Price/Book 18.73 7.23
EV/EBITDA 19.27 38.39
Dividend Yield N/A N/A
Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) trades at a P/E ratio of 29.8, which is considerably lower than Cava Group's (CAVA) P/E of 94.7. This suggests that investors are paying a much higher multiple for Cava's earnings compared to CMG's. While Cava's higher revenue growth rate of 31.3% justifies some premium, CMG's P/E is more aligned with established, profitable companies. CMG's price is currently trading below its 50-day ($34.40) and 200-day ($34.73) moving averages, indicating some technical weakness, whereas Cava's price is below both its 50-day ($60.28) and 200-day ($72.25) averages, suggesting a more pronounced downtrend. However, from a pure valuation perspective based on earnings, CMG presents a more attractive entry point.

Profitability & Efficiency i

Profitability & Efficiency: CMG vs CAVA
Metric CMG CAVA
Rev. Growth (Qtly) 9.30% 31.30%
Profit Margin 11.43% 4.82%
Return on Equity 49.56% 8.32%
Return on Assets 13.08% 3.50%
Debt/Equity 246.35 61.90
Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) significantly outperforms Cava Group (CAVA) in profitability metrics. CMG boasts a net profit margin of 11.43% and a return on equity of 49.56%, demonstrating strong operational efficiency and shareholder value creation. In contrast, Cava's net profit margin stands at a much lower 4.82%, and its return on equity is only 8.32%. CMG's return on assets at 13.08% also dwarfs Cava's 3.5%. These figures highlight CMG's superior ability to convert revenue into profit and generate returns for its investors.

Earnings Reality Check i

CMG

Last 5 Qs: CMG beat estimates 2x out of 5. Rose 2x after beats.

CAVA

Last 4 Qs: CAVA beat estimates 3x out of 4. Rose 3x after beats.

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: CMG vs CAVA
Indicator CMG CAVA
RSI (14) 39.92 57.12
50-Day MA $34.40 $60.28
200-Day MA $34.73 $72.25
Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) is currently exhibiting weaker technical signals compared to Cava Group (CAVA). CMG's RSI is at 39.92, indicating a lack of upward momentum, and its MACD is negative at -0.97, suggesting bearish pressure. The stock is trading below its 50-day ($34.40) and 200-day ($34.73) moving averages. Cava, while also trading below its key moving averages (50-day at $60.28, 200-day at $72.25), shows a stronger RSI of 57.12, suggesting more neutral to positive momentum. However, Cava's MACD is also negative at -1.83. Both stocks are in downtrends relative to their longer-term averages, but Cava shows slightly more current momentum.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

CMG

Hold
Technical Score: 41/100

CAVA

Buy
Technical Score: 68/100
Analyst sentiment favors Cava Group (CAVA) more strongly than Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), although both receive generally positive ratings. CMG has a median analyst target price of $44, with ratings split among Strong Buy (4), Buy (20), and Hold (11). Cava, on the other hand, has a higher median target price of $85, supported by a more bullish rating distribution: Strong Buy (3), Buy (16), and Hold (8), with one Sell rating. This suggests analysts see greater upside potential in Cava, despite CMG's stronger fundamentals.
Note: While CAVA shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Buy 68/100), the AI comparative analysis favors CMG (Hold 41/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: CMG vs CAVA
Metric CMG CAVA
Beta (Volatility) i 0.96 1.81
Sharpe Ratio -0.55 -0.15
For Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), key risks include potential saturation in the fast-casual Mexican market, increasing competition, and challenges in maintaining consistent price increases without impacting demand. Labor costs and supply chain disruptions also pose ongoing threats. Cava Group (CAVA) faces risks related to its rapid expansion, including maintaining unit-level economics and operational consistency as it scales. Its higher valuation makes it more susceptible to significant price corrections if growth expectations are not met. Also, Cava's lower profitability makes it more vulnerable to economic downturns or rising input costs compared to CMG.

Comparative ProTips

  • Prioritize CMG for its established profitability and more attractive valuation multiples over CAVA's higher growth but lower margins.
  • Monitor CAVA's ability to maintain its rapid expansion without compromising unit economics and profitability.
  • Consider CMG's technical weakness as a potential entry point if the stock can reclaim its key moving averages.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
CMG
Current: $31.59
ENTRY ZONES
$30.01
$31.59
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$29.11
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$31.51
+10%
$33.01
+15%
$34.51
CAVA
Current: $53.64
ENTRY ZONES
$50.96
$53.64
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$49.43
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$53.51
+10%
$56.05
+15%
$58.60
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored CMG based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While CAVA currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (68 vs 41), the AI favors CMG on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, CMG or CAVA?+
CMG is a better buy due to its superior profitability and more reasonable valuation (P/E 29.8 vs 94.7). While CAVA has higher revenue growth, CMG's stronger margins and ROE present a more compelling investment case.
What are the key risks for CMG vs CAVA?+
CMG risks include market saturation and competition, while CAVA faces risks from rapid expansion and a higher valuation making it more susceptible to corrections.
How do CMG and CAVA compare on profitability?+
CMG is significantly more profitable, with an 11.43% net profit margin and 49.56% ROE, compared to CAVA's 4.82% margin and 8.32% ROE.
What is the valuation difference between CMG and CAVA?+
CMG trades at a P/E of 29.8, while CAVA trades at a much higher P/E of 94.7, indicating CAVA is priced at a premium to its earnings.
How consistent are earnings surprises for CMG and CAVA?+
Both companies have a history of positive earnings surprises, with CMG recently beating estimates by 3.13% and CAVA by 5.56% in their latest quarters.
What do analysts think of CMG and CAVA?+
Analysts favor CAVA with a higher median target price ($85 vs $44) and a slightly more bullish rating distribution, suggesting greater perceived upside potential in CAVA.
How do their technicals compare currently?+
Both stocks are trading below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages. CAVA shows slightly better momentum with an RSI of 57.12 compared to CMG's 39.92, but both exhibit bearish MACD signals.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of CMG vs CAVA is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 11, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.