Jump to any asset
844 assets, updated daily
Constellation Brands Inc. Class A vs Molson Coors Beverage Company
VS
Comparative Analysis
STZ demonstrates strong positive net profit margins and return on equity, contrasting sharply with TAP's negative figures in these key areas. While both companies operate in the beverage alcohol sector, STZ's operational efficiency and earnings quality present a more compelling investment case at this juncture. TAP's revenue decline further weakens its position relative to STZ's modest growth. This fundamental difference in profitability, coupled with STZ's positive return on equity of 24.01% against TAP's negative -19.47%, establishes STZ as the stronger performer. Although TAP offers a higher dividend yield, STZ's overall financial strength and positive earnings trajectory make it the preferred choice for investors prioritizing sustainable returns and operational excellence.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between Constellation Brands (STZ) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) is profitability. STZ consistently generates strong positive net profit margins and returns on equity, showcasing efficient operations and value creation. In stark contrast, TAP is currently loss-making, with negative margins and returns, highlighting significant operational and financial challenges that STZ does not face.
Joint Outlook
Constellation Brands (STZ) is expected to maintain its positive trajectory, leveraging its strong brand portfolio and efficient operations to continue generating solid earnings. The company's ability to consistently beat earnings estimates and its favorable analyst ratings suggest a positive outlook for the next 6-12 months, with potential for continued price appreciation towards its median analyst target of $150. Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) faces a more challenging outlook. Its negative revenue growth and persistent losses indicate a need for significant strategic adjustments. While the stock may see short-term fluctuations, its long-term prospects are clouded by its inability to achieve consistent profitability and positive top-line growth. Investors should watch for signs of a turnaround, but the current trend suggests caution.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | STZ | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 11.38 | N/A |
| Market Cap | 21.50B | 7.20B |
| Price/Sales | 2.33 | 0.65 |
| Price/Book | 2.51 | 0.71 |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.31 | 5.86 |
| Dividend Yield | 3.25% | 4.94% |
Constellation Brands (STZ) trades at a P/E ratio of 11.38, indicating a more attractive valuation compared to Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP), which has a 'N/A' P/E ratio, suggesting potential underlying profitability issues or a different valuation methodology. STZ's price is currently trading above its 50-day Simple Moving Average ($125.56) and its 20-day Exponential Moving Average ($120.82), signaling positive short-to-medium term momentum. However, its price is below its 200-day SMA ($142.54), suggesting it is still in a recovery phase from a longer-term downtrend. Conversely, TAP's price is below both its 50-day SMA ($39.51) and 200-day SMA ($42.88), indicating a weaker technical picture and potential for further downside. While TAP's price is above its 20-day EMA ($37.76), this is overshadowed by its longer-term technical weakness. STZ's valuation appears more reasonable given its profitability, while TAP's lack of a P/E ratio and weaker technical positioning suggest a less favorable valuation outlook.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | STZ | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 6.10% | -3.30% |
| Profit Margin | 20.90% | -20.81% |
| Return on Equity | 24.01% | -19.47% |
| Return on Assets | 8.68% | 3.79% |
| Debt/Equity | 1.16 | 0.76 |
Constellation Brands (STZ) demonstrates superior profitability with a net profit margin of 20.9% and a return on equity of 24.01%. Its return on assets stands at a healthy 8.68%, indicating efficient use of its assets to generate earnings. These figures highlight STZ's strong operational performance and ability to generate value for shareholders. Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) struggles with profitability, reporting a negative net profit margin of -20.81% and a negative return on equity of -19.47%. While its return on assets is positive at 3.79%, this is overshadowed by the significant losses indicated by its other profitability metrics. TAP's financial performance in terms of profit generation is considerably weaker than STZ's.
Earnings Reality Check
STZ
Last 1 Qs: STZ beat estimates 1x out of 1. Rose 1x after beats.
TAP
Last 2 Qs: TAP beat estimates 2x out of 2. Fell 1x after beats. (Sell the news?)
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | STZ | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.10 | 55.15 |
| 50-Day MA | $125.56 | $39.51 |
| 200-Day MA | $142.54 | $42.88 |
Constellation Brands (STZ) exhibits a strong technical setup, with its Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 62.1, indicating firm upward momentum without being overbought. The Commodity Channel Index (CCI) at 121.21 further supports this bullish sentiment, suggesting that the price is trading significantly above its historical average. The MACD is slightly positive at 0.05, hinting at underlying buying pressure, and the Stochastic Oscillator at 89.20 suggests it is approaching overbought territory, which in a strong trend can persist. Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) shows a more mixed technical picture. Its RSI is at 55.15, indicating neutral to slightly positive momentum. The CCI at 135.58 is high, but the MACD is negative at -0.31, signaling bearish momentum. The Stochastic Oscillator at 93.39 is in overbought territory, and given the negative MACD and its price being below key moving averages, this suggests potential for a pullback or continued weakness. STZ's technicals are generally more constructive.
AI Analyst Sentiment
AI rating: CleaRank Financial AI's overall score for each asset, the same score shown on its own analysis page. It combines price trend and momentum with valuation, analyst and insider data where they exist.
STZ
AI Score: 55/100
TAP
AI Score: 51/100
Constellation Brands (STZ) garners a more favorable analyst sentiment, with a 'Strong Buy' consensus from 3 analysts and a total of 15 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 24 analysts. The median analyst target price of $150 suggests a significant upside potential from its current price of $126.30. This positive outlook from Wall Street analysts indicates confidence in STZ's future performance. Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) has a more divided analyst opinion, with only 6 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 21 analysts, and a significant number of 'Hold' ratings (11). The higher number of 'Sell' and 'Strong Sell' ratings for TAP also contributes to a less positive sentiment.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | STZ | TAP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.97 | -0.61 |
Constellation Brands (STZ) faces risks related to its premium valuation relative to its 200-day moving average and the potential for increased competition within the beverage alcohol market. While its profitability is strong, any slowdown in its 6.1% revenue growth could impact its valuation multiples. Also, changes in consumer preferences towards craft beverages or a significant increase in input costs could pressure its margins. Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP) carries substantial risks due to its negative net profit margin and return on equity, indicating fundamental profitability challenges. Its declining revenue growth of -3.3% suggests market share loss or broader industry headwinds affecting its core business. The stock's technical weakness, trading below key long-term moving averages, also poses a risk of further price depreciation. Additionally, its higher dividend yield might not be sustainable if profitability does not improve.
Comparative ProTips
- Prioritize STZ for its demonstrated profitability and positive growth trajectory over TAP's current financial struggles.
- Monitor TAP's ability to reverse its negative revenue trend and improve its profit margins; failure to do so poses significant downside risk.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
In the median simulated path, $10,000 in STZ grows to about $11,600 and $10,000 in TAP to about $7,500 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
STZ
Current: $126.30
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$119.99
Aggressive
$126.30
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$116.39
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$132.62
+10% from current
$138.93
+15% from current
$145.25
TAP
Current: $38.63
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$36.70
Aggressive
$38.63
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$35.60
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$40.56
+10% from current
$42.49
+15% from current
$44.42
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored STZ based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key risks for STZ vs TAP?+
STZ's risks include potential overvaluation relative to its 200-day SMA and competitive pressures, while TAP faces significant risks from its ongoing losses, declining revenue, and weaker technical positioning.
How do STZ and TAP compare on valuation?+
STZ has a P/E of 11.38 and trades above its 50-day SMA, indicating a more reasonable valuation and positive short-term momentum compared to TAP, which has an 'N/A' P/E and trades below its key moving averages.
How do their profitability metrics compare?+
STZ boasts a strong net profit margin of 20.9% and ROE of 24.01%, whereas TAP reports a negative net profit margin of -20.81% and ROE of -19.47%.
How does the dividend yield compare?+
TAP offers a higher dividend yield of 4.94% compared to STZ's 3.25%, but STZ's stronger financial health makes its dividend more sustainable.
How have STZ and TAP performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 15, 2026, STZ's price fell 9.1% and TAP's fell 16.7%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, STZ or TAP?+
They have been about equally volatile. Over the 30 days to October 15, 2026, STZ's annualized volatility was 26.5% and TAP's 24.8%, measured from daily closing prices.