TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

ETF·NYSE

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF VOO

$701.61 ▼ 1.10%
Buy
75 / 100 AI score
Full VOO analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF SCHG

$35.21 ▼ 2.00%
Buy
66 / 100 AI score
Full SCHG analysis →
01

The short version

How VOO and SCHG compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

VOO and SCHG on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours VOO
VOO SCHG
75/100 AI score 66/100
+14.9% 1-year change +10.3%
11.2% Volatility (30d, yearly) 16.3%
43.7 RSI (14-day) 38.6
The verdict
VOO's broader market exposure and consistent performance across various market cycles offer a more stable foundation for long-term investment. While SCHG has shown impressive growth, particularly in technology, VOO's diversified approach and cost efficiency make it the preferred choice for a core portfolio holding.
Key difference
The key differentiator between VOO and SCHG is their investment strategy and resulting diversification. VOO offers broad exposure to the entire U.S. large-cap market, balancing growth and value across all sectors. SCHG, conversely, is a large-cap growth ETF with a heavy tilt towards technology, aiming for higher growth potential but accepting increased sector-specific risk and volatility. VOO's lower expense ratio also provides a persistent advantage in long-term total returns.
Outlook
Looking ahead 6-12 months, VOO is expected to track the broader U.S. equity market, benefiting from any overall economic expansion but also susceptible to market-wide corrections. Its performance will largely mirror the S&P 500's trajectory. SCHG's outlook is more closely tied to the performance of large-cap growth stocks and the technology sector. If growth stocks continue to outperform and technology remains a leading sector, SCHG could see higher returns. However, any rotation out of growth or a slowdown in tech could lead to underperformance relative to VOO.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
VOO SCHG

Over 1 year: VOO gained 14.7% and SCHG gained 10.3%, a gap of 4.5 points in VOO's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

How big each is, where each trades in its year, and its trend.

VOO SCHG
$1.74T Size (net assets / market cap) $63.9B
$6.0M 24h volume $8.9M
88% Position in 52-week range 79%
-0.7% Price against 50-day average -1.5%
Reading
VOO trades at a price of $701.61, which is below its 52-week high of $718.47 and significantly above its 52-week low of $578.46. Its 50-day simple moving average is $706.62, and its 200-day SMA is $666.69, indicating a current price below the shorter-term average but above the longer-term average. SCHG is priced at $35.21, closer to its 52-week high of $37.10 than its low of $27.96. Its 50-day SMA is $35.75, and its 200-day SMA is $33.32, suggesting it is trading below its 50-day average but above its 200-day average. VOO's current price action shows it is consolidating, while SCHG is showing some recent weakness relative to its short-term average.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

VOO SCHG
75/100 AI score 66/100
43.7 RSI (14-day) 38.6
-0.7% Price against 50-day average -1.5%
+5.2% Price against 200-day average +5.7%
Technicals
VOO is currently exhibiting neutral momentum, with an RSI of 43.71 and a Stochastic reading of 19.71, indicating it is not overbought. Its MACD is 1.447, suggesting some underlying positive momentum. The price is trading below its 20-day EMA of $708.49 but above its 200-day SMA of $666.69. SCHG shows weaker momentum, with an RSI of 38.63 and a Stochastic of 7.80, both signaling oversold conditions. Its MACD is 0.113, indicating very little positive momentum. The price is trading below its 20-day EMA of $36.09 and its 50-day SMA of $35.75, pointing to recent downward pressure.
Sentiment
As broad-based ETFs, VOO and SCHG do not have analyst ratings or price targets in the traditional sense. Sentiment is inferred from their price action and underlying holdings' performance. VOO's stable performance and broad diversification suggest a generally positive, albeit not overly exuberant, sentiment among investors seeking market-wide exposure. SCHG's recent price weakness, despite its growth focus, may indicate a slight cooling of sentiment or a rotation out of its heavily concentrated technology holdings.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

VOO SCHG
11.2% Volatility (30d, yearly) 16.3%
0.86 Sharpe ratio 0.76
Risk
VOO's primary risk lies in broad market downturns, as it tracks the S&P 500. Its diversification mitigates single-stock risk but does not protect against systemic market events. The concentration in technology (38.72%) within VOO also presents a sector-specific risk if the tech sector underperforms. SCHG's main risk stems from its significant concentration in growth stocks, particularly technology (54.29%), making it more susceptible to sector-specific downturns and higher volatility compared to VOO. A sharp correction in large-cap tech could disproportionately impact SCHG's performance.
ProTips
  1. Consider VOO as a core holding for broad market exposure and cost efficiency, while SCHG can be used as a satellite holding for targeted growth exposure.
  2. Monitor the technology sector closely, as SCHG's performance is heavily dependent on its continued strength.
  3. For investors prioritizing lower costs and broad diversification, VOO remains the superior choice over SCHG.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VOO
Current: $701.61
ENTRY ZONES
$666.53
$701.61
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$646.53
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$736.69
+10% from current
$771.77
+15% from current
$806.85
SCHG
Current: $35.21
ENTRY ZONES
$33.45
$35.21
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$32.45
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$36.97
+10% from current
$38.73
+15% from current
$40.49
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored VOO based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do VOO and SCHG compare on expense ratios?+
VOO has a lower expense ratio of 0.03%, costing $3.00 per $10,000 invested annually. SCHG has a slightly higher expense ratio of 0.04%, costing $4.00 per $10,000 invested annually.
Which ETF provides better long-term returns?+
Historically, SCHG has shown stronger 10-year returns (18.68%) compared to VOO (15.29%), reflecting the outperformance of growth stocks in that period. However, VOO's returns are more consistent and less volatile, and its lower fees contribute to its long-term performance.
How diversified are VOO and SCHG?+
VOO is highly diversified across all 11 GICS sectors, with its largest sector, Technology, representing 38.72%. SCHG is less diversified, with a significant overweight in Technology (54.29%) and Communication Services (13.65%), making it more concentrated in growth-oriented sectors.
What is the dividend yield for VOO and SCHG?+
VOO offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 1.06%. SCHG has a lower dividend yield of approximately 0.39%.
Which is more volatile, VOO or SCHG?+
SCHG has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 18, 2026, VOO's annualized volatility was 11.2% and SCHG's 16.3%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do VOO and SCHG move together?+
Yes, closely: over roughly the past year to October 18, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +0.95 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both adds little diversification.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of VOO vs SCHG is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 18, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.