Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins this head-to-head comparison against SCHG, driven by its superior momentum and broader sector exposure, particularly in technology. While both are large-cap growth ETFs, QQQ's longer-term performance and higher net assets suggest greater market acceptance and liquidity. SCHG offers a lower expense ratio, which is a significant advantage for cost-conscious investors, but QQQ's performance across multiple timeframes, especially over 5 and 10 years, indicates a stronger ability to capture market upside. The current technical indicators show both ETFs are in positive territory, but QQQ's slightly higher RSI and MACD suggest a marginally stronger upward trend. Investors seeking broad exposure to the growth segment of the market will find QQQ to be the more compelling choice due to its historical performance and dominant technology weighting.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between QQQ and SCHG is QQQ's pronounced tilt towards the technology sector and its resulting superior long-term performance, despite a higher expense ratio. QQQ's 59.15% allocation to technology has historically allowed it to capture significant growth, evidenced by its higher 10-year trailing return of 20.78% compared to SCHG's 18.68%. While SCHG offers a lower cost structure ($4.00 per $10,000 invested versus $18.00), QQQ's ability to generate alpha through its sector concentration and larger asset base makes it the more compelling choice for investors prioritizing growth capture over minimal fees.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both QQQ and SCHG remains positive, tied to the broader growth prospects of the technology sector and the overall market. QQQ is expected to continue benefiting from its strong overweight in technology, potentially leading the market higher if tech innovation and earnings remain strong. However, a significant tech downturn could pose a considerable risk. SCHG, with its broader diversification, may offer more stability in a volatile market but could lag QQQ during strong tech rallies. Investors should monitor interest rate trends, as rising rates can pressure growth stocks, and geopolitical events that could impact global technology supply chains.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $555.60 - $762.86 | $27.96 - $37.10 |
| Prev. Close | $747.58 | $36.42 |
| Market Cap | 261.11B | N/A |
| 24h Volume | 21.12M | 7.11M |
Valuation comparison between QQQ and SCHG is indirect as they are ETFs, but we can infer relative attractiveness through their expense ratios and historical performance. QQQ, with an expense ratio of 0.18%, is considerably more expensive than SCHG's 0.04%. This translates to a cost of $18.00 per $10,000 invested for QQQ versus $4.00 for SCHG annually. Despite the higher cost, QQQ's net assets of $488.98 billion dwarf SCHG's $63.85 billion, indicating a much larger investor base and potentially greater liquidity. While SCHG offers a cheaper entry point, QQQ's historical performance, particularly over longer periods like 5 and 10 years, suggests that its higher expense ratio has been justified by superior returns, indicating a stronger underlying growth profile or market capture.
Market Performance
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 17.19% | 16.00% |
| 24h Range | $748.37 - $752.87 | $36.54 - $36.79 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 57.8 | 58.3 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~17%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.83 | 58.30 |
| 50-Day MA | $724.52 | $35.65 |
| 200-Day MA | $672.18 | $33.24 |
QQQ is currently trading at $751.27, with its 50-day SMA at $724.52 and 200-day SMA at $672.18, indicating a strong uptrend with the price well above key moving averages. Its RSI is 57.83, suggesting positive momentum without being overbought. SCHG is trading at $36.74, with its 50-day SMA at $35.65 and 200-day SMA at $33.24, also showing a healthy uptrend. SCHG's RSI is slightly higher at 58.3, indicating similar positive momentum. Both ETFs exhibit strong technicals, but QQQ's larger price appreciation relative to its moving averages and its higher MACD value of 9.58 compared to SCHG's 0.36 suggest a more pronounced upward momentum. QQQ is also closer to its 52-week high of $762.86 than SCHG is to its $37.10 high, indicating stronger recent performance.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
QQQ
Technical Score: 79/100
SCHG
Technical Score: 78/100
Sentiment for both QQQ and SCHG is difficult to gauge directly as they are ETFs and do not have analyst ratings or median target prices. However, investor sentiment can be inferred from their net assets and trailing returns. QQQ's significantly larger net assets ($488.98 billion) compared to SCHG ($63.85 billion) suggest stronger investor confidence and demand. Also, QQQ's superior trailing returns across multiple timeframes, particularly the 10-year return of 20.78%, indicate a positive market perception and a history of delivering on investor expectations. This suggests a more favorable sentiment towards QQQ's strategy and holdings.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.94 | 0.79 |
The primary risk for QQQ lies in its heavy concentration in the technology sector (59.15%). A significant downturn in technology stocks could disproportionately impact QQQ's performance. Additionally, its higher expense ratio of 0.18% means that a larger portion of returns is paid out in fees compared to SCHG. For SCHG, while it offers broader diversification across sectors, its lower net assets ($63.85 billion) could imply less liquidity in extreme market conditions compared to QQQ. Its trailing returns, while strong, have historically lagged behind QQQ over longer periods, suggesting a potential risk of underperformance in capturing high-growth opportunities. Both ETFs are subject to general market risk and interest rate sensitivity inherent in growth-oriented investments.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider SCHG if minimizing expense ratios is your absolute top priority, as its 0.04% fee is a significant advantage over QQQ's 0.18%.
- For investors prioritizing exposure to the technology sector and aiming for higher long-term growth potential, QQQ's historical performance and sector concentration make it the preferred choice.
- Evaluate your own risk tolerance regarding sector concentration; QQQ's heavy tech weighting offers higher potential rewards but also carries greater risk than SCHG's more diversified approach.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
QQQ
Current: $751.27
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$713.71
Aggressive
$751.27
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$692.30
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$749.39
+10%
$785.08
+15%
$820.76
SCHG
Current: $36.74
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$34.90
Aggressive
$36.74
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$33.86
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$36.65
+10%
$38.39
+15%
$40.14
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF offers a better expense ratio, QQQ or SCHG?+
SCHG has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.04%, costing $4.00 per $10,000 invested annually, compared to QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio, which costs $18.00 per $10,000 invested.
How do QQQ and SCHG compare in terms of long-term performance?+
QQQ has historically outperformed SCHG over longer periods. For example, QQQ's 10-year trailing return is 20.78%, while SCHG's is 18.68%. This suggests QQQ has been more effective at capturing market growth over time.
What are the main sector differences between QQQ and SCHG?+
QQQ is heavily concentrated in Technology, making up 59.15% of its holdings, whereas SCHG has a more diversified sector allocation, with Technology at 54.29% and significant portions in Industrials and Healthcare.
Which ETF has larger net assets?+
QQQ has substantially larger net assets, standing at $488.98 billion, compared to SCHG's $63.85 billion. This indicates greater investor demand and potentially higher liquidity for QQQ.
What are the key risks associated with investing in QQQ?+
The primary risk for QQQ is its heavy concentration in the technology sector, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. Its higher expense ratio also detracts from overall returns compared to lower-cost alternatives like SCHG.
What are the key risks associated with investing in SCHG?+
While SCHG offers lower fees and broader diversification, its historical underperformance relative to QQQ over the long term presents a risk of missing out on significant growth opportunities, particularly within the technology sector.
How do the technical indicators compare between QQQ and SCHG?+
Both ETFs show positive technical momentum, with similar RSI values around 58. However, QQQ exhibits a stronger upward trend indicated by its higher MACD value (9.58 vs 0.36) and its price being further above its key moving averages.