Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins this head-to-head comparison against SCHG, primarily driven by its superior momentum and stronger historical performance across multiple timeframes. While both ETFs target large-cap growth, QQQ's heavier allocation to technology and its longer track record of outperformance, particularly over the last decade, make it the preferred choice for investors seeking growth exposure. SCHG offers a lower expense ratio, which is a significant advantage for cost-conscious investors, but QQQ's performance edge in the current market environment is more compelling. QQQ's dominance is evident in its trailing returns, where it significantly outperforms SCHG over 1, 3, 5, and 10-year periods. This outperformance is supported by its stronger technical indicators, including a higher RSI and a more constructive MACD signal, suggesting greater upward price momentum. Although SCHG's lower expense ratio presents a cost advantage, QQQ's ability to generate higher returns justifies its slightly higher fee for investors prioritizing growth and performance.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between QQQ and SCHG lies in their performance history and sector concentration. QQQ's decade-long outperformance, driven by its significant tilt towards the technology sector, demonstrates its ability to capture growth opportunities more effectively than SCHG. While SCHG offers a lower expense ratio, QQQ's superior track record and stronger momentum indicators make it the more compelling choice for investors prioritizing growth.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for QQQ is cautiously optimistic, supported by its strong historical performance and continued dominance in technology. Its heavy tech weighting positions it well to benefit from ongoing digital transformation trends, but it faces risks from potential regulatory actions and market saturation in certain tech sub-sectors. A scenario of sustained economic growth and innovation would favor QQQ. SCHG's outlook is positive, benefiting from its diversified approach within the large-cap growth space. Its lower expense ratio provides a structural advantage over time. While it may not capture the extreme highs of QQQ during tech booms, its broader diversification could offer more resilience during sector-specific downturns. A stable economic environment with moderate growth would likely see SCHG perform steadily, potentially closing the gap with QQQ over the very long term.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $555.60 - $748.65 | $27.96 - $36.11 |
| Prev. Close | $708.69 | $34.86 |
| Market Cap | 261.11B | N/A |
| 24h Volume | 304.97K | 227.65K |
QQQ's current price of $716.97 is trading slightly below its 20-day exponential moving average of $714.48, indicating some short-term consolidation. However, it remains above its 50-day simple moving average of $710.45 and its 200-day simple moving average of $660.15, confirming a longer-term uptrend. The RSI of 52.67 suggests neutral momentum, not yet overbought or oversold. SCHG, priced at $35.24, is also trading near its 20-day EMA of $35.28, showing similar short-term consolidation. Its RSI of 48.82 indicates slightly weaker momentum compared to QQQ. While SCHG is above its 50-day SMA of $34.90 and 200-day SMA of $32.90, confirming its own uptrend, the indicators suggest QQQ has stronger underlying price strength.
Market Performance
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 19.87% | 16.72% |
| 24h Range | $713.69 - $717.61 | $35.12 - $35.28 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 52.7 | 48.8 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~18%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 52.67 | 48.82 |
| 50-Day MA | $710.45 | $34.90 |
| 200-Day MA | $660.15 | $32.90 |
QQQ exhibits stronger technical momentum, with an RSI of 52.67 and a MACD of 0.839, indicating a generally positive trend without being overbought. Its price is trading above both its 50-day ($710.45) and 200-day ($660.15) moving averages, confirming a solid uptrend. The stochastic indicator at 66.57 suggests it is in the upper range but not yet overbought. SCHG's technicals are less compelling, with an RSI of 48.82 and a MACD of 0.071, pointing to more neutral momentum. It is also trading above its 50-day ($34.90) and 200-day ($32.90) moving averages, but its stochastic reading of 36.50 indicates it is in the lower half of its range. QQQ's price action and momentum indicators suggest a more favorable technical setup for continued upward movement.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
QQQ
Technical Score: 78/100
SCHG
Technical Score: 75/100
As ETFs, QQQ and SCHG do not have analyst ratings or median price targets in the same way individual stocks do. Sentiment for these funds is typically inferred from their price action, trading volumes, and investor flows. QQQ's consistent outperformance and higher net assets suggest strong investor confidence and positive sentiment. SCHG, while a popular choice for its low cost, appears to be experiencing less pronounced positive sentiment based on its current technical indicators and trailing returns compared to QQQ.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | QQQ | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.69 | 0.58 |
QQQ's primary risk stems from its heavy concentration in the technology sector. A significant downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or macroeconomic shifts, could disproportionately impact QQQ's performance. Its higher expense ratio also represents a drag on returns over the long term. SCHG's risks are more diversified due to its broader sector allocation. However, as a growth-focused ETF, it remains susceptible to rising interest rates which can diminish the present value of future earnings. Its lower net assets compared to QQQ might also imply slightly less liquidity in extreme market conditions, although this is unlikely to be a major concern given its substantial size.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider SCHG for its lower expense ratio if cost is a primary concern and you are willing to accept potentially lower historical returns.
- QQQ's strong historical performance and tech-heavy allocation make it suitable for investors with a higher risk tolerance seeking aggressive growth.
- Monitor interest rate expectations, as rising rates can negatively impact growth-oriented ETFs like both QQQ and SCHG.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
QQQ
Current: $716.97
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$681.12
Aggressive
$716.97
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$660.68
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$715.17
+10%
$749.23
+15%
$783.28
SCHG
Current: $35.24
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$33.48
Aggressive
$35.24
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$32.47
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$35.15
+10%
$36.83
+15%
$38.50
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF offers a better expense ratio, QQQ or SCHG?+
SCHG has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.04% compared to QQQ's 0.18%. This means for every $10,000 invested, SCHG costs $4 annually, while QQQ costs $18 annually, making SCHG the more cost-effective option.
How do QQQ and SCHG compare in terms of historical returns?+
QQQ has demonstrated superior historical returns across multiple timeframes, including 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year periods, significantly outperforming SCHG in most categories, especially over the longer term.
What are the primary risks associated with investing in QQQ?+
The main risk for QQQ is its heavy concentration in the technology sector. A significant downturn in tech stocks could lead to outsized losses for the ETF.
What are the primary risks associated with investing in SCHG?+
SCHG's primary risk is its focus on growth stocks, making it sensitive to rising interest rates. Its broader diversification offers some buffer, but it remains vulnerable to growth stock market corrections.
Which ETF provides better exposure to the technology sector?+
QQQ offers substantially greater exposure to the technology sector, holding approximately 59.15% in Technology, compared to SCHG's 46.96%.
How do the net assets of QQQ and SCHG compare?+
QQQ has significantly larger net assets ($488.98 billion) than SCHG ($63.03 billion), indicating greater market acceptance and potentially higher liquidity.
What is the outlook for large-cap growth ETFs like QQQ and SCHG?+
The outlook for large-cap growth ETFs remains positive, contingent on continued technological innovation and economic expansion. However, they face headwinds from potential interest rate hikes and regulatory scrutiny, particularly for tech-heavy funds like QQQ.