Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins this head-to-head comparison against VUG, primarily driven by its superior momentum and stronger year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns. While both ETFs target large-cap growth stocks and share significant overlap in their technology sector concentration, QQQ's higher net assets and longer track record suggest greater market acceptance and stability. VUG offers a lower expense ratio, which is a notable advantage for long-term cost-conscious investors, but QQQ's current performance trajectory and broader market exposure give it the edge in this analysis. QQQ's performance advantage is evident across multiple timeframes, particularly in its year-to-date and 1-year returns, which significantly outpace VUG. This momentum is supported by its technical indicators, which, while not showing extreme overbought conditions, indicate a healthy upward trend. VUG, though a strong performer historically, is currently lagging behind QQQ. Investors seeking immediate performance and exposure to the leading growth names would favor QQQ, while those prioritizing lower costs and a slightly more conservative growth approach might lean towards VUG.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between QQQ and VUG is QQQ's demonstrably stronger recent momentum and performance, evidenced by its superior year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns and more positive technical indicators like MACD. While VUG offers a significantly lower expense ratio, QQQ's current market leadership and broader investor demand, reflected in its higher net assets, position it as the more dynamic investment at this time.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both QQQ and VUG remains tied to the performance of large-cap growth stocks, particularly within the technology sector. Given QQQ's current momentum and stronger trailing returns, it is positioned to potentially continue its outperformance in the near term, especially if technology sector growth persists. However, VUG's lower expense ratio provides a more cost-effective foundation for long-term growth, which could lead to it catching up or surpassing QQQ over longer investment horizons. A scenario where interest rates stabilize or decline could further benefit both ETFs, as growth stocks are sensitive to borrowing costs. Conversely, a significant economic slowdown or a rotation out of growth into value sectors would present headwinds for both QQQ and VUG. Investors should weigh QQQ's current performance edge against VUG's long-term cost efficiency when making their investment decision.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $69.63 - $93.00 | $555.60 - $762.86 |
| Prev. Close | $91.31 | $747.58 |
| Market Cap | 20.21B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 4.34M | 21.12M |
Instead, their valuation is implicitly tied to the performance of their underlying holdings, which are predominantly large technology and growth-oriented companies. QQQ's higher net assets ($488.98 billion) compared to VUG ($392.07 billion) suggest broader market demand and potentially a higher aggregate valuation of its constituents. Both ETFs are heavily weighted in the technology sector, indicating a shared exposure to growth stock valuations. The trailing returns data, especially year-to-date and 1-year, suggest that QQQ's underlying assets are currently commanding higher market valuations relative to VUG's.
Market Performance
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 16.29% | 17.19% |
| 24h Range | $91.49 - $92.13 | $748.37 - $752.87 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 56.5 | 57.8 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~17%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56.50 | 57.83 |
| 50-Day MA | $88.97 | $724.52 |
| 200-Day MA | $83.49 | $672.18 |
QQQ exhibits stronger current momentum compared to VUG, as indicated by its technical indicators. While both ETFs show RSI values in the healthy mid-50s (QQQ: 57.83, VUG: 56.5), suggesting room for further upside without being overbought, QQQ's MACD value of 9.58 is significantly higher than VUG's 1.01, pointing to a stronger upward trend. Both ETFs are trading above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, confirming overall uptrends. QQQ's price is also trading closer to its 52-week high ($751.27 vs $762.86) than VUG ($91.97 vs $93), indicating stronger recent price appreciation and momentum. QQQ's upward trajectory is further supported by its higher CCI value (48.57) compared to VUG (71.76), although both are in positive territory. The stochastic readings also show QQQ (62.89) with more upward momentum than VUG (70.57), though both are in the upper range. The proximity of both ETFs to their 52-week highs suggests continued bullish sentiment, but QQQ's stronger MACD and higher price action relative to its averages give it a technical edge.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VUG
Technical Score: 75/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 75/100
Analyst ratings and median target prices are not available for either VUG or QQQ, preventing a direct comparison of institutional sentiment. However, the market performance and technical indicators provide indirect sentiment signals. QQQ's stronger year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns, coupled with its more positive MACD reading, suggest a more favorable market sentiment towards its underlying holdings compared to VUG. The higher net assets of QQQ also indicate broader investor confidence and demand. The price action for both ETFs, trading above key moving averages and approaching 52-week highs, reflects a generally positive sentiment within the large-cap growth space.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.82 | 0.94 |
The primary risk for both VUG and QQQ lies in their significant concentration within the technology sector. A downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or macroeconomic shifts, would disproportionately impact both ETFs. QQQ, with its slightly higher concentration in technology (59.15% vs 57.75%), may face marginally greater sector-specific risk. Additionally, as growth-oriented ETFs, they are more sensitive to interest rate hikes, which can increase borrowing costs for companies and reduce the present value of future earnings. QQQ's higher expense ratio ($18.00 per $10,000 invested) compared to VUG ($3.00 per $10,000 invested) represents a direct cost risk for investors, eroding returns over time. While QQQ's current performance is superior, a prolonged period of underperformance could make its higher fees a more significant drag. VUG's lower expense ratio provides a degree of downside protection from a cost perspective.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VUG for long-term cost savings due to its significantly lower expense ratio.
- Monitor technology sector performance closely, as it is the primary driver for both QQQ and VUG.
- QQQ's stronger current momentum may offer short-to-medium term outperformance, but VUG's lower fees provide a structural advantage over extended periods.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VUG
Current: $91.97
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$87.37
Aggressive
$91.97
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$84.75
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$91.74
+10%
$96.11
+15%
$100.48
QQQ
Current: $751.27
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$713.71
Aggressive
$751.27
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$692.30
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$749.39
+10%
$785.08
+15%
$820.76
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, QQQ or VUG?+
QQQ is currently the better buy due to its stronger momentum and superior year-to-date and 1-year trailing returns. While VUG has a lower expense ratio, QQQ's performance leadership makes it more attractive for investors seeking immediate growth.
What are the key risks for QQQ compared to VUG?+
Both ETFs face risks from technology sector concentration and sensitivity to interest rates. QQQ's higher expense ratio of 0.18% compared to VUG's 0.03% also presents a greater cost risk over time.
How do the expense ratios of QQQ and VUG compare?+
VUG is significantly cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.03%, costing $3.00 per $10,000 invested annually. QQQ has a higher expense ratio of 0.18%, costing $18.00 per $10,000 invested annually.
Which ETF has better trailing returns?+
QQQ demonstrates better trailing returns across multiple key periods, including year-to-date (16.996% vs 11.128%) and 1-year (26.347% vs 13.093%).
How concentrated are QQQ and VUG in the technology sector?+
Both ETFs are heavily concentrated in technology. QQQ has approximately 59.15% in technology, while VUG has about 57.75% in the sector.
What is the net asset size of QQQ versus VUG?+
QQQ has larger net assets, totaling $488.98 billion, compared to VUG's $392.07 billion, indicating greater overall investor demand and market presence.
How do the technical indicators compare between QQQ and VUG?+
QQQ shows stronger technical momentum with a higher MACD value (9.58 vs 1.01) and is trading closer to its 52-week high, suggesting a more strong current uptrend than VUG.