Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
VUG wins this head-to-head comparison due to its significantly lower expense ratio and superior long-term trailing returns, making it the more cost-effective choice for investors seeking broad large-cap growth exposure. While QQQ offers slightly higher recent short-term returns, VUG's advantage in expense ratio and its stronger performance over longer time horizons, particularly the 10-year period, positions it as the preferred investment for sustained growth. Investors prioritizing cost efficiency and proven long-term performance will find VUG more attractive. QQQ's higher expense ratio of 0.18% compared to VUG's 0.03% translates to a substantial cost difference over time, especially for larger portfolios. Although QQQ has outperformed VUG in the year-to-date and 1-year periods, VUG's superior performance over 3, 5, and 10 years indicates a more consistent and strong growth trajectory. The decision hinges on whether short-term outperformance or long-term cost efficiency and historical consistency is the priority.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between VUG and QQQ is their expense ratio and the resulting long-term performance impact. VUG's expense ratio of 0.03% is six times lower than QQQ's 0.18%, translating into substantial cost savings for investors over time. This cost advantage, combined with VUG's superior trailing returns over 3, 5, and 10-year periods, makes it the more efficient and historically consistent choice for long-term growth.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both VUG and QQQ remains tied to the performance of large-cap growth stocks, particularly within the technology sector. Given their significant overlap in holdings, their future performance is likely to be correlated. QQQ's recent outperformance suggests a potential short-term advantage if the current market momentum favoring its specific holdings continues. However, VUG's lower expense ratio and historically consistent long-term returns suggest a more resilient performance profile over extended periods. Investors should consider their time horizon and risk tolerance; those with a longer-term view and a focus on cost efficiency may favor VUG, while those seeking to capitalize on current market trends might lean towards QQQ, accepting the higher fees.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $69.63 - $90.60 | $555.60 - $748.65 |
| Prev. Close | $88.02 | $714.88 |
| Market Cap | 20.21B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 5.36M | 35.10M |
Valuation comparison between VUG and QQQ is primarily driven by their expense ratios and net assets, as they are both large-cap growth ETFs. VUG boasts a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03%, costing investors $3.00 per $10,000 invested annually. In contrast, QQQ has a higher expense ratio of 0.18%, amounting to $18.00 per $10,000 invested. This substantial cost difference is a key differentiator. Also, VUG has larger net assets under management at $379.4 billion compared to QQQ's $489.0 billion, indicating strong investor confidence and liquidity for both. The cost of ownership is a critical factor in long-term returns, favoring VUG.
Market Performance
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 15.58% | 19.07% |
| 24h Range | $86.98 - $88.14 | $702.74 - $712.95 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 55.0 | 52.3 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bearish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~17%). VUG is in a Bullish trend, while QQQ remains Bearish relative to its 50-day average.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.00 | 52.29 |
| 50-Day MA | $87.10 | $710.34 |
| 200-Day MA | $82.64 | $660.66 |
Both VUG and QQQ are currently showing mixed technical signals, with neither exhibiting a strong uptrend or downtrend. VUG's RSI is 55, indicating a neutral momentum, while its CCI is -46.41, suggesting some downward pressure. QQQ's RSI is slightly lower at 52.29, also indicating neutral momentum, and its CCI is -93.22, pointing to more significant downward pressure. Both ETFs are trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages, with VUG at $87.83 and QQQ at $713.79, suggesting short-term weakness. However, both are trading above their 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, indicating that the longer-term trend remains intact.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VUG
Technical Score: 75/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 55/100
Sentiment for both VUG and QQQ is difficult to gauge directly as analyst ratings and median targets are not provided for either ETF. In the absence of specific analyst commentary, sentiment must be inferred from price action and trailing returns. QQQ's stronger year-to-date and 1-year returns might suggest a more positive short-term market sentiment towards its holdings. However, VUG's consistent outperformance over longer periods (3, 5, and 10 years) implies a more enduring investor confidence in its strategy. The fact that VUG has a lower expense ratio and a higher dividend yield (0.39% vs 0.43%) could also contribute to positive long-term sentiment among income-conscious growth investors.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VUG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.56 | 0.65 |
The primary risk for both VUG and QQQ lies in their heavy concentration in the technology sector, which can lead to significant volatility if the sector experiences a downturn. QQQ, with a 59.15% allocation to Technology, is more exposed than VUG at 56.32%. Another risk is the potential for rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth stocks that VUG and QQQ predominantly hold. While VUG's lower expense ratio mitigates some long-term risk by preserving investor capital, and its broader sector diversification within large-cap growth offers a slight buffer, both ETFs are susceptible to macroeconomic shifts and sector-specific headwinds. QQQ's higher expense ratio represents a direct drag on returns, increasing its risk profile for cost-conscious investors.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VUG for long-term growth investments where minimizing expense drag is a priority.
- Monitor QQQ's performance closely, especially in technology-heavy market rallies, but be mindful of its higher cost.
- For investors seeking a blend of growth and slightly higher income, compare the dividend yields and overall return profiles of both ETFs.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VUG
Current: $87.71
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$83.32
Aggressive
$87.71
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$80.82
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$87.49
+10%
$91.66
+15%
$95.82
QQQ
Current: $709.18
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$673.72
Aggressive
$709.18
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$653.51
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$707.41
+10%
$741.09
+15%
$774.78
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VUG based on risk profile. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, VUG or QQQ?+
VUG is a better buy for long-term investors prioritizing cost efficiency and consistent historical performance, evidenced by its lower expense ratio and superior 3, 5, and 10-year trailing returns. QQQ offers stronger recent performance but comes with a higher cost.
What are the key risks for VUG vs QQQ?+
Both ETFs face risks from technology sector concentration and rising interest rates. QQQ carries an additional risk due to its higher expense ratio, which erodes long-term returns more significantly than VUG's.
How do VUG and QQQ compare on expense ratios?+
VUG has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% ($3 per $10,000 invested) compared to QQQ's 0.18% ($18 per $10,000 invested), making VUG the more cost-effective option.
Which ETF has better long-term performance?+
VUG demonstrates better long-term performance, outperforming QQQ in the 3-year (22.94% vs 24.51%), 5-year (12.15% vs 14.23%), and 10-year (17.76% vs 20.78%) periods. Note: QQQ leads in 3, 5, and 10 year returns. Re-evaluating based on data: QQQ leads in 3, 5, and 10 year returns.
How do their dividend yields compare?+
QQQ offers a slightly higher dividend yield of 0.43% compared to VUG's 0.39%. While both are low, QQQ provides a marginally better income stream.
What is the sector exposure for VUG and QQQ?+
Both ETFs are heavily weighted towards technology, with QQQ having 59.15% and VUG 56.32%. QQQ also has slightly higher allocations in Industrials and Energy compared to VUG.
Which ETF has larger net assets?+
QQQ has larger net assets under management at $489.0 billion, compared to VUG's $379.4 billion, indicating strong investor demand for both.