Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
VGT wins this head-to-head comparison due to its superior technical momentum and lower expense ratio, despite QQQM's broader sector exposure. VGT's price is trading above key moving averages, indicating a stronger uptrend. While QQQM offers a more diversified exposure within large-cap growth, VGT's concentrated technology focus has driven better recent performance and exhibits more bullish technical signals. Investors prioritizing technology sector gains and lower costs should favor VGT. QQQM remains a solid choice for broader large-cap growth exposure but lags in current technical strength and cost-efficiency. Overall, VGT presents a more compelling technical picture and better value proposition for investors seeking technology-centric growth. Its current price action and momentum indicators suggest continued upward potential. QQQM, while diversified, shows less immediate technical strength and carries a higher cost. The choice hinges on whether the investor prioritizes concentrated tech exposure with strong technicals or broader large-cap growth with slightly less momentum.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between VGT and QQQM is VGT's hyper-focused exposure to the technology sector versus QQQM's broader large-cap growth mandate. This concentration allows VGT to capture the full upside of technology trends but also exposes it to higher sector-specific risk. Currently, VGT's superior technical momentum and lower expense ratio give it an edge, indicating that the market is strongly favoring its concentrated approach.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for VGT is positive, driven by its strong technical momentum and the ongoing demand for technology innovation. Its concentrated sector exposure positions it to benefit from secular growth trends in areas like AI, cloud computing, and digital transformation. However, investors should remain aware of the potential for increased volatility inherent in a single-sector ETF. QQQM's outlook is also positive, benefiting from its diversified exposure to leading large-cap growth companies. Its performance will likely be tied to broader economic conditions and market sentiment towards growth stocks. While it may not capture the extreme highs of a pure tech ETF, its diversification offers a degree of resilience. Both ETFs are expected to outperform their respective categories over the long term, with VGT showing stronger near-term technical strength.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VGT | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $83.09 - $126.00 | $228.75 - $308.21 |
| Prev. Close | $119.63 | $291.80 |
| 24h Volume | 26.50K | 31.65K |
VGT is currently trading at $121.425, closer to its 52-week high of $126 than its low of $83.09. This represents a position approximately 30% above its 52-week low. QQQM is trading at $295.32, also closer to its 52-week high of $308.21 than its low of $228.75. This indicates QQQM is roughly 29% above its 52-week low. Both ETFs show strong performance relative to their yearly lows, but VGT's price action is currently exhibiting slightly more upward momentum relative to its range. Their sector holdings provide valuation context. VGT's near-total allocation to technology implies a higher aggregate valuation multiple compared to QQQM, which includes other sectors. However, VGT's current technical setup suggests this higher valuation is supported by strong market sentiment and demand for technology assets.
Market Performance
| Metric | VGT | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 26.84% | 19.87% |
| 24h Range | $120.68 - $121.70 | $293.90 - $295.40 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 58.7 | 52.9 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
VGT has shown higher recent volatility (26.8%) compared to QQQM (19.9%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VGT | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 58.73 | 52.85 |
| 50-Day MA | $117.65 | $292.53 |
| 200-Day MA | $104.34 | $271.80 |
VGT exhibits stronger current technical momentum, with its RSI at 58.73 and CCI at 75.64, indicating solid upward pressure without being overbought. Its price is trading above its 20-day EMA ($119.83), 50-day SMA ($117.65), and 200-day SMA ($104.34), confirming a robust uptrend. The MACD at 0.79 also suggests positive momentum. QQQM shows a more neutral technical picture, with an RSI of 52.85 and CCI of 37.95. While its price is above its 50-day SMA ($292.53) and 200-day SMA ($271.80), it is trading slightly below its 20-day EMA ($294.20), suggesting some near-term consolidation. The MACD at 0.36 is positive but less pronounced than VGT's. VGT's stochastic reading of 89.67 is high, indicating it is approaching overbought territory, but in strong trend phases, oscillators can remain elevated.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VGT
Technical Score: 78/100
QQQM
Technical Score: 78/100
Sentiment for both VGT and QQQM is difficult to gauge directly as neither has analyst ratings or median target prices provided. However, their recent performance and technical indicators offer insights. VGT's stronger technicals, including its higher RSI and CCI, suggest positive market sentiment and demand for technology-focused assets. QQQM's more neutral technicals indicate a less enthusiastic, or perhaps more balanced, market sentiment. The significant outperformance of VGT year-to-date (28.20% vs 17.02%) implies that market participants are favoring its underlying holdings. This suggests a positive outlook from investors and traders regarding the technology sector's prospects, which is the primary driver for VGT.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VGT | QQQM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.81 | 0.70 |
The primary risk for VGT is its high concentration in the technology sector. Any significant downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or macroeconomic headwinds affecting tech spending, could disproportionately impact VGT's performance. Its high stochastic reading also suggests a potential for a short-term pullback or consolidation. QQQM's risk profile is more diversified due to its broader sector exposure, which can act as a buffer against sector-specific downturns. However, its exposure to large-cap growth stocks means it remains sensitive to interest rate hikes and changes in market risk appetite. The fact that QQQM's 1-year trailing return is lower than its category average suggests it may face headwinds in certain market environments.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VGT if you have a strong conviction in the continued outperformance of the technology sector.
- QQQM offers a more balanced approach to large-cap growth, potentially providing a smoother ride through market cycles.
- Always compare expense ratios for ETFs, as even small differences can compound significantly over time. VGT's lower cost is a tangible advantage.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $121.43
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$115.35
Aggressive
$121.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$111.89
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$121.12
+10%
$126.89
+15%
$132.66
QQQM
Current: $295.32
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$280.55
Aggressive
$295.32
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$272.14
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$294.58
+10%
$308.61
+15%
$322.64
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VGT based on technical setup. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, VGT or QQQM?+
VGT is currently the better buy due to its stronger technical momentum and lower expense ratio (0.09% vs 0.15%). While QQQM offers broader diversification, VGT's concentrated technology focus is driving superior year-to-date performance.
What are the key risks for VGT versus QQQM?+
VGT's primary risk is its heavy concentration in the technology sector, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. QQQM's risk is more diversified but it remains sensitive to broad market risk appetite and interest rate changes.
Which ETF has lower costs?+
VGT has a lower expense ratio of 0.09% compared to QQQM's 0.15%. This means VGT costs $9 per $10,000 invested annually, while QQQM costs $15.
How do their sector exposures differ?+
VGT is almost entirely invested in technology (99.15%), whereas QQQM has a more diversified portfolio including Technology (59.15%), Communication Services (12.7%), and Consumer Cyclical (11.11%), among others.
Which ETF has shown better recent performance?+
VGT has demonstrated stronger recent performance, with a year-to-date return of 28.20% compared to QQQM's 17.02%. This trend is also evident in their 1-year and 5-year trailing returns.
What do the technical indicators suggest for VGT and QQQM?+
VGT shows stronger technical momentum with a higher RSI (58.73) and CCI (75.64), and its price is well above key moving averages. QQQM exhibits more neutral technicals with an RSI of 52.85 and is trading closer to its 20-day EMA.
How do their net assets compare?+
VGT has larger net assets of $169.38 billion compared to QQQM's $104.38 billion, suggesting greater investor adoption and liquidity for VGT.