TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 873 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

ETF·NYSE

Vanguard Information Technology ETF VGT

$122.78 ▲ 1.50%
Buy
74 / 100 AI score
Full VGT analysis →
vs

ETF·NASDAQ

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF QQQM

$296.90 ▲ 1.24%
Buy
67 / 100 AI score
Full QQQM analysis →
01

VGT vs QQQM: the verdict

How VGT and QQQM compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

CleaRank Financial AI favours VGT
VGT QQQM
74/100 AI score 67/100
+24.6% 1-year change +14.8%
23.9% Volatility (30d, yearly) 19.5%
49.9 RSI (14-day) 47.0
The verdict
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) comes out ahead on CleaRank's model, scoring 74/100 (Buy) against 67/100 (Buy) for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The widest gap is momentum, where QQQM is weaker: the 14-day RSI of 36.5 is in the bearish zone and the MACD line is negative.
Key difference
Cost also works in VGT's favor, with an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Outlook
VGT sits between its 50-day average at $122.35 and its 200-day at $108.86. QQQM sits between its 50-day average at $298.86 and its 200-day at $278.87.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
VGT QQQM

Over 1 year: VGT gained 24.6% and QQQM gained 14.8%, a gap of 9.8 points in VGT's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

VGT QQQM
$177.9B Size (net assets / market cap) $109.8B
3.2M Volume (shares, last session) 2.9M
83% Position in 52-week range 80%
+0.3% Price against 50-day average -0.6%
Reading
Of the two, VGT is the cheaper fund to hold. Its expense ratio is 0.09%, while QQQM's is 0.15%. On a $10,000 holding, that works out to $9.00 a year for VGT and $15.00 for QQQM. VGT is also the larger fund, with $177.9B in net assets against $109.8B for QQQM.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Indicators side by side

VGT QQQM
74/100 AI score 67/100
49.9 RSI (14-day) 47.0
+0.3% Price against 50-day average -0.6%
+12.6% Price against 200-day average +6.3%
Technicals
Its 14-day RSI is 45.0, in the neutral zone, with the MACD line negative. QQQM is in a mixed trend, trading 0.58% below its 50-day average and 6.32% above its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 36.5, in the bearish zone, with the MACD line negative. VGT sits higher in its 52-week range, at 80% against 76% for QQQM.
Sentiment
Over the past month VGT slipped 4.15%, though over three months it climbed 7.58%. QQQM dropped 4.94% across the past month and gained 2.98% over three months.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, how much return each has paid for that risk, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk measures

VGT QQQM
23.9% Volatility (30d, yearly) 19.5%
0.88 Sharpe ratio 0.77
Risk
VGT swings more on a typical day, with an average move of 1.37% against 1.18% for QQQM.
ProTips
  1. For QQQM, watch the 50-day SMA at $298.86 above the price and the 200-day SMA at $278.87 below it.
  2. Costs compound: VGT charges $9.00 a year on $10,000 and QQQM $15.00.
06

VGT vs QQQM: long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

2026202820302032
VGT median VGT 90th QQQM median QQQM 90th
VGT QQQM
$8,377 Downside, 2032 (10th) $8,568
$18,411 Base case, 2032 (median) $17,165
$40,462 Upside, 2032 (90th) $34,388

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in VGT grows to about $18,400 and $10,000 in QQQM to about $17,200 by 2032. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $122.78
ENTRY ZONES
$116.64
$122.78
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$113.14
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$128.92
+10% from current
$135.06
+15% from current
$141.20
QQQM
Current: $296.90
ENTRY ZONES
$282.05
$296.90
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$273.59
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$311.74
+10% from current
$326.59
+15% from current
$341.43
Disclaimer
The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored VGT based on price momentum, on today's data.
08

VGT vs QQQM: questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, VGT or QQQM?+
On CleaRank's model VGT scores higher, 74/100 (Buy) against 67/100 (Buy) for QQQM. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation.
Which has performed better over the past year, VGT or QQQM?+
Over the past year VGT has done better. Its price rose 24.98%, while QQQM's rose 15.38%.
Which is cheaper to own, VGT or QQQM?+
VGT is the cheaper fund to hold, with an expense ratio of 0.09% versus 0.15% for QQQM.
Which pays more income, VGT or QQQM?+
QQQM pays the higher yield, at 0.43% against 0.38% for VGT. Yield is the payout divided by the price, so it moves whenever either of those does.
Which is riskier, VGT or QQQM?+
VGT moves more from one session to the next. Its average daily move is 1.37%, while QQQM's is 1.18%.
Which has stronger momentum right now, VGT or QQQM?+
VGT has the higher 14-day RSI, 45.0 (neutral) against 36.5 (bearish) for QQQM. Both MACD lines are negative. Readings above 70 or below 30 mark stretched momentum.
Which fund is larger, VGT or QQQM?+
VGT is the bigger fund, with $177.9B in net assets compared with $109.8B for QQQM.
Which is closer to its 52-week high, VGT or QQQM?+
QQQM is closer: it trades 6.46% below its 52-week high of $314.11, against 7.44% below $130.66 for VGT.
Are VGT and QQQM in an uptrend?+
QQQM is in a mixed trend, trading 0.58% below its 50-day average and 5.36% above its 200-day.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of VGT vs QQQM is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 27, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.