Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
VTI wins due to its significantly lower expense ratio and superior long-term returns relative to its category, making it the more cost-effective and historically better-performing choice for broad market exposure. While QQQ offers concentrated growth potential, VTI's diversified approach and lower fees provide a more compelling overall investment. QQQ's focus on large-cap growth stocks, particularly in technology, has driven strong performance in certain periods. However, its higher expense ratio and narrower sector concentration introduce greater risk and potentially lower long-term efficiency compared to VTI's comprehensive market coverage. Investors seeking broad diversification and cost efficiency will find VTI the superior option.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between VTI and QQQ is their expense ratio and underlying investment strategy. VTI's ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03% and its mandate to track the total U.S. stock market provide unparalleled cost efficiency and diversification. QQQ, while offering concentrated exposure to the Nasdaq-100, comes with a higher expense ratio of 0.18% and is subject to the volatility inherent in its growth-heavy, tech-centric holdings. This difference in cost and diversification directly translates into VTI's superior long-term performance relative to its category, making it the more prudent choice for investors prioritizing long-term wealth accumulation and risk management.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both VTI and QQQ is tied to the broader economic environment and investor sentiment towards growth versus value and diversification. For VTI, the outlook is generally positive, reflecting the long-term growth trajectory of the U.S. economy. Its broad diversification provides resilience against sector-specific shocks, and its low expense ratio ensures that investors capture a greater share of market returns. QQQ's outlook is more dependent on the performance of the technology sector and interest rate sensitivity. If technology continues its growth trajectory and interest rates stabilize or decline, QQQ could outperform. However, any significant headwinds for tech, such as increased regulation or a shift in investor preference towards value, could lead to underperformance relative to VTI. The current technical weakness in both suggests a period of consolidation or potential pullback before a clear trend emerges.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VTI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $310.40 - $385.12 | $555.60 - $748.65 |
| Prev. Close | $376.31 | $709.18 |
| Market Cap | 725.71B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 3.04M | 375.63K |
Instead, their 'valuation' is reflected in their underlying holdings and expense ratios. VTI, with an expense ratio of 0.03%, is substantially cheaper than QQQ's 0.18%. This cost difference directly impacts net returns over time, making VTI more 'valuable' from a fee perspective. QQQ's higher expense ratio means investors pay more for its concentrated exposure to the Nasdaq-100. While its sector concentration in Technology (59.15%) can lead to higher growth, the lower cost of VTI, which covers the entire U.S. stock market, offers a more efficient way to gain broad market exposure. The cost per $10,000 invested is $3 for VTI versus $18 for QQQ.
Market Performance
| Metric | VTI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 11.95% | 14.84% |
| 24h Range | $373.28 - $376.06 | $703.91 - $709.52 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 45.6 | 45.7 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bearish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~13%). VTI is in a Bullish trend, while QQQ remains Bearish relative to its 50-day average.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VTI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.60 | 45.73 |
| 50-Day MA | $374.60 | $709.99 |
| 200-Day MA | $352.56 | $661.14 |
Both VTI and QQQ are currently exhibiting weak technical signals, trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages and showing low stochastic readings. VTI's RSI is 45.6 and QQQ's is 45.73, indicating a lack of strong momentum in either ETF. VTI's price is trading slightly above its 50-day simple moving average (374.60 vs 374.60) while QQQ is below its 50-day SMA (704.89 vs 709.99). Despite both ETFs showing similar technical weakness, VTI's price is closer to its 50-day SMA, suggesting slightly more stability in its current trading range. QQQ's MACD is negative (-0.48) while VTI's is slightly positive (0.03), hinting at a minor edge for VTI in terms of short-term trend direction. However, neither ETF presents a compelling technical buy signal at this juncture.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VTI
Technical Score: 75/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 55/100
As broad market ETFs, VTI and QQQ do not have analyst ratings or median price targets. Sentiment must be inferred from their price action and historical performance. QQQ, with its heavy technology weighting, is often more sensitive to market sentiment shifts regarding growth stocks. VTI, representing the entire U.S. stock market, reflects a broader investor sentiment across all sectors. The current price action for both ETFs shows a lack of conviction, with RSI values in the mid-40s. This suggests a neutral to slightly bearish sentiment in the short term. However, VTI's historical outperformance against its category, especially over longer periods, implies a persistent positive underlying sentiment among investors favoring broad diversification and cost efficiency.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VTI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 |
The primary risk for QQQ stems from its heavy concentration in the technology sector. A significant downturn in major tech companies could disproportionately impact QQQ's performance. Its higher expense ratio also represents a drag on returns, especially in lower-return environments. Also, its focus on growth stocks makes it more susceptible to rising interest rates and shifts in investor preference away from high-multiple companies. VTI's main risk is its comprehensive exposure to the entire U.S. stock market, meaning it will capture downturns across all sectors. However, its diversification significantly mitigates the impact of any single sector or company's poor performance. The lower expense ratio of VTI reduces the risk of fees eroding long-term returns, making it a more resilient choice against market volatility and fee compression.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VTI for core portfolio holdings due to its low cost and broad diversification, providing efficient market exposure.
- QQQ can be used as a satellite holding for investors seeking targeted exposure to the growth potential of large-cap technology and Nasdaq-100 companies, understanding its higher risk profile.
- Monitor the expense ratios of ETFs closely, as even small differences can significantly impact long-term investment returns, making VTI's lower fee a key advantage.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VTI
Current: $374.68
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$355.95
Aggressive
$374.68
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$345.27
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$373.74
+10%
$391.54
+15%
$409.34
QQQ
Current: $704.89
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$669.64
Aggressive
$704.89
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$649.55
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$703.12
+10%
$736.60
+15%
$770.09
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VTI based on income/dividend profile. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, VTI or QQQ?+
VTI is generally a better buy for most investors due to its significantly lower expense ratio (0.03% vs 0.18%) and broader diversification across the entire U.S. stock market. While QQQ offers concentrated growth potential, VTI provides more cost-efficient and diversified exposure.
What are the key risks for VTI vs QQQ?+
QQQ's primary risk is its heavy concentration in technology stocks, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. VTI's risk is its broad market exposure, meaning it will capture declines across all sectors, though diversification mitigates single-stock or sector-specific risk.
How do their expense ratios compare?+
VTI has a substantially lower expense ratio of 0.03%, costing $3 per $10,000 invested annually. QQQ's expense ratio is higher at 0.18%, costing $18 per $10,000 invested annually.
Which ETF has better long-term returns?+
VTI has demonstrated superior long-term returns compared to its category, particularly over 5 and 10 years, outpacing QQQ's category-relative returns in those periods. VTI's 10-year return is 14.81% versus its category's 13.77%.
How diversified are VTI and QQQ?+
VTI is highly diversified, covering the entire U.S. stock market across all sectors. QQQ is concentrated, with technology comprising nearly 60% of its holdings, alongside significant allocations to communication services and consumer cyclical sectors.
What is the sector exposure of each ETF?+
VTI's sector allocation is broad, with Technology being its largest at 35.06%, followed by Healthcare (9.85%) and Consumer Defensive (8.51%). QQQ is heavily weighted towards Technology (59.15%), Communication Services (12.7%), and Consumer Cyclical (11.11%).
Which ETF is more suitable for income investors?+
VTI is more suitable for income investors due to its higher dividend yield (1.04%) compared to QQQ (0.43%) and its broader exposure to dividend-paying companies across various sectors.