Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins this head-to-head comparison due to its superior technical momentum and significantly larger net assets, indicating greater market acceptance and liquidity. While MAGS offers a lower expense ratio, QQQ's established track record and broader market exposure in technology provide a more compelling investment case for growth-oriented portfolios. MAGS, despite its lower cost, lags in historical performance and asset size, suggesting it is a newer entrant still building its market presence. Investors seeking broad exposure to large-cap growth stocks will find QQQ's performance and scale more attractive at this juncture.
Key Differentiator
The decisive factor favoring QQQ is its sheer scale and established market dominance, evidenced by its $488.98 billion in net assets compared to MAGS' $4.28 billion. This vast difference signifies significant investor trust, superior liquidity, and a proven long-term performance record that MAGS, as a newer and smaller ETF, cannot yet match. While MAGS offers a lower expense ratio, QQQ's overall value proposition, driven by its historical performance and market acceptance, outweighs the cost difference for most investors.
Joint Outlook
QQQ is expected to continue its strong performance, driven by its heavy allocation to the technology sector and its established market position. Its large net assets and strong technical indicators suggest sustained upward momentum over the next 6-12 months, assuming the tech sector remains favorable. MAGS faces an uphill battle to match QQQ's performance; while it benefits from a similar sector focus, its smaller size and higher expense ratio present headwinds. A scenario where MAGS could outperform would require significant outperformance from its specific holdings not captured by QQQ's broader index, or a substantial reduction in its expense ratio.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $55.08 - $73.46 | $555.60 - $748.65 |
| Prev. Close | $72.51 | $741.10 |
| Market Cap | 1.68B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 2.69M | 30.02M |
QQQ's valuation is supported by its strong price performance, trading at $744.50, which is closer to its 52-week high of $748.65 than MAGS is to its own high. QQQ's price is currently $744.50, with a 52-week low of $555.60, placing it significantly above its lows and demonstrating strong upward price action. MAGS, trading at $72.64, is also above its 52-week low of $55.08, but its 52-week high is $73.46, indicating it is closer to its yearly peak relative to its range than QQQ. However, QQQ's larger net assets of $488.98 billion compared to MAGS' $4.28 billion suggest greater investor confidence and market depth, which often correlates with sustained valuation.
Market Performance
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 21.46% | 18.08% |
| 24h Range | $72.04 - $72.76 | $739.64 - $745.91 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 70.5 | 66.2 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~20%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both. Momentum indicators suggest potential overbought conditions.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 70.51 | 66.15 |
| 50-Day MA | $68.20 | $712.66 |
| 200-Day MA | $65.65 | $665.59 |
QQQ exhibits stronger current technical momentum, with a higher RSI of 66.15 and a more significant MACD value of 7.48 compared to MAGS' RSI of 70.51 and MACD of 1.22. Both ETFs are trading above their 20-day, 50-day, and 200-day moving averages, confirming uptrends. QQQ's price is trading at $744.50, well above its 20-day EMA of $725.15 and 50-day SMA of $712.66, indicating strong upward price action. MAGS is also above its averages, with its price at $72.64, its 20-day EMA at $70.52 and 50-day SMA at $68.20. QQQ's higher CCI of 102.36 and Stochastic of 92.43 suggest it is in a stronger, more extended bullish phase than MAGS' CCI of 94.60 and Stochastic of 82.77.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
MAGS
Technical Score: 78/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 79/100
Sentiment for both MAGS and QQQ is difficult to gauge directly as neither has analyst ratings or median target prices available. However, QQQ's significantly larger net assets ($488.98 billion) compared to MAGS ($4.28 billion) strongly suggest greater investor confidence and positive market sentiment towards QQQ. This massive difference in AUM indicates a long-standing preference and trust in QQQ's investment strategy and performance. MAGS, being a newer fund with a higher expense ratio, likely faces a sentiment hurdle as it competes for investor capital against the established giant.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.82 |
The primary risk for QQQ lies in its heavy concentration within the technology sector (59.15%), making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns or regulatory changes impacting big tech. Its large size also means that significant market shifts could have a pronounced effect. For MAGS, the key risks include its relatively smaller net assets and shorter track record, which could imply less resilience during market stress compared to QQQ. Its higher expense ratio of 0.30% also presents a drag on performance over the long term, potentially eroding returns relative to lower-cost alternatives. Also, MAGS' trailing returns lag behind QQQ's across most comparable periods.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider QQQ for its established track record and market leadership in technology, despite its higher expense ratio.
- MAGS may appeal to investors prioritizing a lower expense ratio, but its performance and scale are less proven than QQQ's.
- Diversify holdings beyond single-sector ETFs like QQQ to mitigate concentration risk, even with its strong performance.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
MAGS
Current: $72.64
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$69.01
Aggressive
$72.64
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$66.94
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$72.46
+10%
$75.91
+15%
$79.36
QQQ
Current: $744.50
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$707.28
Aggressive
$744.50
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$686.06
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$742.64
+10%
$778.00
+15%
$813.37
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on technical setup. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, MAGS or QQQ?+
QQQ is the better buy due to its superior technical momentum, larger net assets, and stronger historical returns, despite a higher expense ratio than MAGS. QQQ's established market position and technology sector dominance offer a more compelling investment case.
What are the key risks for MAGS vs QQQ?+
QQQ's main risk is its heavy technology sector concentration, while MAGS faces risks related to its smaller asset base, shorter track record, and higher expense ratio.
How do MAGS and QQQ compare on expense ratios?+
MAGS has a higher expense ratio of 0.30% compared to QQQ's 0.18%, making QQQ cheaper to hold annually despite its larger asset size.
What is the historical performance difference between MAGS and QQQ?+
QQQ has demonstrated significantly stronger trailing returns across multiple timeframes, including 1-year and 10-year periods, compared to MAGS, which has limited historical data available.
How does the size of MAGS and QQQ compare?+
QQQ is vastly larger, with $488.98 billion in net assets, compared to MAGS' $4.28 billion, indicating greater investor confidence and market liquidity for QQQ.
Which ETF offers better technical momentum?+
QQQ shows stronger technical momentum with a higher RSI (66.15 vs 70.51) and MACD (7.48 vs 1.22), indicating a more strong upward price trend.
What are the sector exposures of MAGS and QQQ?+
QQQ is heavily concentrated in Technology (59.15%), while MAGS also focuses on technology but has a less defined sector breakdown provided in the data.