Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
vs
MAGS vs QQQ: the verdict
How MAGS and QQQ compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.
The verdict
CleaRank Financial AI favours
MAGS
MAGS
QQQ
51/100
AI score
49/100
+1.6%
1-year change
+8.3%
30.1%
Volatility (30d, yearly)
35.8%
43.7
RSI (14-day)
40.1
The verdict
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) comes out ahead on CleaRank's model, scoring 51/100 (Hold) against 49/100 (Hold) for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ). The widest gap is the trend: for MAGS, the price is 3.13% above its 200-day average, and the 50-day average is 6.79% above the 200-day.
Outlook
MAGS sits between its 50-day average at $70.97 and its 200-day at $66.46. QQQ would need to regain its 50-day average at $720.22 and its 200-day at $681.17 to turn its downtrend.
Price, side by side
Both prices start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the moves compare directly.
Rebased price
-15%-10%-5%0%-7.1%-10%
Nov '26
-10%-5%0%+5%+10%+0.2%-6.1%
Sep '26Oct '26Nov '26
-10%-5%0%+5%-0.8%-4.6%
Jun '26Jul '26Aug '26Sep '26Oct '26Nov '26
-20%-10%0%+10%+20%+8.3%+1.6%
Dec '25Feb '26Apr '26Jul '26Sep '26Nov '26
0%+20%+40%+60%+59%+46%
Oct '24Mar '25Aug '25Jan '26Jun '26Nov '26
Over 1 year: MAGS gained 1.6% and QQQ gained 8.3%, a gap of 6.7 points in QQQ's favour.
Key metrics
Size and recent performance for each.
Size and market performance
MAGS
QQQ
$5.5B
Size (net assets / market cap)
$498.9B
3.4M
Volume (shares, last session)
451.6M
68%
Position in 52-week range
58%
-3.4%
Price against 50-day average
-6.2%
Reading
Cost sets QQQ apart here: its expense ratio is 0.18%, below the 0.30% charged by MAGS, so QQQ is the cheaper fund to hold. Put into numbers, a $10,000 holding costs $30.00 a year in MAGS and $18.00 in QQQ. QQQ is also the bigger fund, with $498.9B in net assets compared with $5.5B for MAGS.
Momentum and sentiment
The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.
Indicators side by side
MAGS
QQQ
51/100
AI score
49/100
43.7
RSI (14-day)
40.1
-3.4%
Price against 50-day average
-6.2%
+3.1%
Price against 200-day average
-1.0%
Technicals
MAGS is in a mixed trend, trading 3.40% below its 50-day average and 3.13% above its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 43.7, in the neutral zone, with the MACD line negative. QQQ is in a downtrend, trading 6.20% below its 50-day average and 0.97% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 40.1, in the neutral zone, with the MACD line negative. MAGS sits higher in its 52-week range, at 71% against 59% for QQQ.
Sentiment
MAGS fell 6.34% over the past month and rose 0.07% over three months. QQQ fell 9.65% over the past month and fell 5.84% over three months.
Risk and practical tips
How much each moves, how much return each has paid for that risk, and what to watch if you hold either.
Risk measures
MAGS
QQQ
30.1%
Volatility (30d, yearly)
35.8%
0.75
Sharpe ratio
0.69
Risk
On a typical day QQQ moves more than MAGS, 1.86% against 1.61%. The deepest falls in the price history tell a similar story: MAGS fell 27.9% from December 2024 to April 2025, while QQQ lost 34.6% between December 2021 and October 2022. Taken together, these measures put QQQ as the riskier of the two.
ProTips
- For MAGS, watch the 20-day EMA at $70.00 above the price and the 200-day SMA at $66.46 below it.
- For QQQ, watch the 200-day SMA at $681.17 above the price and the 52-week low at $555.60 below it.
- Costs compound: MAGS charges $30.00 a year on $10,000 and QQQ $18.00.
MAGS vs QQQ: long-term scenarios
Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.
Simulated growth of $10,000
$10K$15K$20K$25K$24.2K$22.2K$13.7K$13.4K
202620282029
MAGS
QQQ
$7,730
Downside, 2029 (10th)
$8,052
$13,681
Base case, 2029 (median)
$13,355
$24,215
Upside, 2029 (90th)
$22,151
In the median simulated path, $10,000 in MAGS grows to about $13,700 and $10,000 in QQQ grows to about $13,400 by 2029. The paths come from each asset's own volatility and capped historical trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.
MAGS vs QQQ: questions people ask
Answered from the figures on this page.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, MAGS or QQQ?+
On CleaRank's model MAGS scores higher, 51/100 (Hold) against 49/100 (Hold) for QQQ. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation.
Which has performed better over the past year, MAGS or QQQ?+
QQQ has done better: its price rose 11.32% over the past year, while MAGS rose 5.24%.
Which is cheaper to own, MAGS or QQQ?+
Holding QQQ costs less each year: its expense ratio is 0.18%, while MAGS charges 0.30%.
Which pays more income, MAGS or QQQ?+
MAGS has the higher yield, 1.36% against 0.42% for QQQ. A yield is the payout divided by the price, so it changes when either one does.
Which is riskier, MAGS or QQQ?+
QQQ is the riskier of the two on the measures we track. Average daily move: 1.61% for MAGS, 1.86% for QQQ. Worst fall in the price history: 27.9% for MAGS, 34.6% for QQQ.
Which has stronger momentum right now, MAGS or QQQ?+
Both MACD lines are negative. Readings above 70 or below 30 mark stretched momentum.
Which fund is larger, MAGS or QQQ?+
QQQ is the bigger fund, with $498.9B in net assets. MAGS holds $5.5B.
How would $10,000 have grown in MAGS or QQQ?+
A $10,000 stake in MAGS from May 2023 would now be worth $26,685. The same amount put into QQQ from December 2016 would now be worth $60,883. Because the two periods begin on different dates, the end values do not compare directly.
Which is closer to its 52-week high, MAGS or QQQ?+
MAGS is closer: it trades 7.60% below its 52-week high of $74.78, against 11.02% below $762.86 for QQQ.