Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
VS
Comparative Analysis
QQQ wins this head-to-head comparison against MAGS, primarily driven by its superior momentum and broader market exposure. While MAGS offers a slightly lower expense ratio, QQQ's established track record and significant net assets provide greater confidence for institutional investors seeking broad technology sector exposure. QQQ's current price action and technical indicators suggest a stronger upward trend. MAGS, though newer, has not yet demonstrated the same level of sustained performance or market penetration as QQQ. Investors prioritizing established market leadership and strong performance metrics will find QQQ the more compelling choice at this juncture.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between QQQ and MAGS is QQQ's established market leadership, significantly larger net assets, and superior long-term performance track record. While MAGS offers a competitive expense ratio, QQQ's proven ability to deliver returns and its significant liquidity provide a more compelling case for institutional investors seeking exposure to the technology sector.
Joint Outlook
QQQ is expected to continue its upward trajectory, driven by ongoing innovation and demand in the technology sector. Its strong momentum and large asset base suggest resilience. MAGS, while showing positive early performance, faces the challenge of competing with QQQ's established dominance. A scenario where MAGS gains significant market share would likely require a notable shift in investor preference or a specific catalyst favoring newer tech ETFs. Over the next 6-12 months, QQQ is likely to maintain its leadership, though both ETFs will be sensitive to macroeconomic factors like interest rates and inflation impacting growth stocks.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $55.08 - $74.13 | $555.60 - $762.86 |
| Prev. Close | $73.03 | $747.58 |
| Market Cap | 1.71B | 261.11B |
| 24h Volume | 3.26M | 21.12M |
QQQ's valuation is supported by its significant net assets of $488.98 billion and a long history dating back to 1999, indicating market trust and stability. MAGS, with net assets of $4.28 billion and an inception date in April 2023, is a much younger ETF. While MAGS has a lower expense ratio of 0.30% compared to QQQ's 0.18%, QQQ's cost per $10,000 invested at $18.00 is still competitive against MAGS's $30.00. QQQ's broader sector concentration, heavily weighted towards technology (59.15%), suggests a growth-oriented valuation tied to the tech sector's performance. MAGS, also technology-focused, has not yet established the same scale or breadth of market participation.
Market Performance
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 21.34% | 17.19% |
| 24h Range | $73.33 - $73.90 | $748.37 - $752.87 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 55.5 | 57.8 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~19%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.46 | 57.83 |
| 50-Day MA | $69.80 | $724.52 |
| 200-Day MA | $65.95 | $672.18 |
QQQ exhibits stronger current momentum with an RSI of 57.83 and a MACD of 9.58, trading above its 50-day ($724.52) and 200-day ($672.18) moving averages. MAGS shows a neutral RSI of 55.46 and a MACD of 1.15, also trading above its key moving averages (SMA 50: $69.80, SMA 200: $65.95). QQQ's price is currently $751.27, closer to its 52-week high of $762.86, indicating strong upward price action. MAGS is trading at $73.77, also near its 52-week high of $74.13. QQQ's stochastic indicator at 62.89 suggests room for further upward movement, while MAGS's stochastic at 88.64 indicates it is approaching overbought territory.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
MAGS
Technical Score: 55/100
QQQ
Technical Score: 79/100
As both MAGS and QQQ are ETFs, traditional analyst ratings and targets are not applicable. Sentiment is inferred from their performance, asset flows, and market positioning. QQQ's substantial net assets and long history suggest strong institutional and retail investor confidence. MAGS, being a newer product, has less established sentiment but is gaining traction. The strong year-to-date and 1-year returns for QQQ indicate positive market sentiment towards its underlying holdings, primarily large-cap technology stocks.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 |
The primary risk for QQQ lies in its heavy concentration in the technology sector (59.15%); any downturn in tech could disproportionately impact its performance. Regulatory changes affecting large technology companies or shifts in consumer demand for tech products represent significant headwinds. MAGS shares similar sector concentration risks, being technology-focused. As a newer ETF, MAGS also carries the risk of not achieving sufficient scale or facing intense competition from established players like QQQ. Its lower net assets could also imply less liquidity in certain market conditions compared to QQQ.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider QQQ for its established market position and superior long-term performance, especially if seeking broad technology exposure.
- Monitor MAGS's growth and performance closely; its lower expense ratio could become more attractive if it achieves greater scale and comparable returns.
- Given both ETFs' tech concentration, diversify holdings across different sectors to mitigate sector-specific risks.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
MAGS
Current: $73.77
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$70.08
Aggressive
$73.77
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$67.98
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$73.59
+10%
$77.09
+15%
$80.59
QQQ
Current: $751.27
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$713.71
Aggressive
$751.27
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$692.30
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$749.39
+10%
$785.08
+15%
$820.76
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored QQQ based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF is a better buy, MAGS or QQQ?+
QQQ is the preferred buy due to its stronger momentum, larger net assets, and superior long-term performance history. While MAGS has a lower expense ratio, QQQ's established market position and strong technicals make it more attractive for institutional investors.
What are the key risks for MAGS versus QQQ?+
Both ETFs face risks from technology sector concentration. QQQ's main risk is its heavy weighting in large-cap tech, while MAGS, as a newer ETF, faces risks related to scale, liquidity, and competition from established funds like QQQ.
How do MAGS and QQQ compare on expense ratios?+
MAGS has a higher expense ratio of 0.30% compared to QQQ's 0.18%. However, QQQ's significantly larger net assets and overall performance may justify the slightly higher cost for many investors.
What is the historical performance difference between MAGS and QQQ?+
QQQ has demonstrated significantly stronger historical returns, outperforming MAGS year-to-date (16.996% vs 8.566%) and over the past year (26.347% vs 12.057%). MAGS's track record is limited due to its recent inception.
How does the size of MAGS and QQQ compare?+
QQQ is substantially larger than MAGS, with net assets of $488.98 billion compared to MAGS's $4.28 billion. This size difference indicates greater market acceptance and liquidity for QQQ.
What sectors do MAGS and QQQ primarily invest in?+
Both ETFs are heavily concentrated in the technology sector. QQQ has approximately 59.15% of its assets in technology, while MAGS also focuses on technology-related companies, though specific sector breakdowns for MAGS are not detailed.
Are there any dividend differences between MAGS and QQQ?+
QQQ offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.41%, while MAGS has a slightly higher yield of about 1.32%. However, the primary investment thesis for both is growth rather than income.