Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
VGT wins this head-to-head comparison, primarily driven by its superior technical momentum and a more concentrated exposure to the high-growth technology sector. While VOO offers broad market diversification and a higher dividend yield, VGT's current technical indicators and sector focus present a more compelling growth opportunity in the near to medium term. Investors seeking aggressive growth should favor VGT, while those prioritizing income and broad market exposure may lean towards VOO. VOO, representing the S&P 500, provides a stable, diversified portfolio with a solid dividend yield of 1.04%. Its technicals are currently neutral to positive, with an RSI of 53.19 and a positive MACD, but it lacks the strong upward momentum seen in VGT. VGT, focused on technology, shows stronger technical signals, including a higher RSI of 59.6 and a positive MACD, indicating a more favorable short-term trend. The expense ratio for VOO is also significantly lower, making it a more cost-effective choice for long-term passive investing.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between VGT and VOO is their investment focus and resulting risk-reward profile. VGT offers concentrated exposure to the technology sector, aiming for higher growth potential but with increased sector-specific risk. VOO provides broad diversification across the entire U.S. equity market, offering stability and a more moderate growth trajectory with lower inherent risk due to diversification. This fundamental difference in strategy dictates which ETF is more suitable depending on an investor's risk tolerance and return objectives.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for VGT remains positive, contingent on the continued strength and innovation within the technology sector. If tech companies maintain their earnings growth and market leadership, VGT is well-positioned to outperform. However, increased regulatory scrutiny or a rotation out of growth stocks could present headwinds. VOO's outlook is tied to the overall health of the U.S. economy and the S&P 500 index. It is expected to provide steady, diversified returns, benefiting from broad economic expansion but likely lagging behind sector-specific leaders like technology in periods of strong sector rotation. In a bull case scenario, continued technological advancements and strong corporate earnings could propel VGT significantly higher, while VOO would benefit from a generally positive economic environment. In a bear case, a recession or a significant tech sector correction would hit VGT harder, while VOO would likely experience a more moderate decline due to its diversification. The differing expense ratios mean VOO offers a slight advantage in net returns over the long haul, assuming similar gross performance.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VGT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $83.09 - $130.66 | $578.46 - $718.47 |
| Prev. Close | $127.25 | $711.28 |
| 24h Volume | 3.05M | 4.34M |
Instead, their 'valuation' is assessed through their underlying holdings and sector concentration. VGT's concentration in the technology sector implies a higher aggregate valuation based on growth expectations for tech companies. VOO, with its broad market exposure across all sectors, presents a more moderate overall valuation profile. The price action relative to 52-week highs and lows offers a proxy for momentum. VGT is trading at $127.98, closer to its 52-week high of $130.66 than its low of $83.09. VOO is trading at $715.59, also near its 52-week high of $718.47 compared to its low of $578.46. Both are performing well relative to their ranges, but VGT's proximity to its high suggests stronger recent performance.
Market Performance
| Metric | VGT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 19.07% | 12.14% |
| 24h Range | $126.95 - $128.20 | $712.54 - $716.44 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 59.6 | 53.2 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
VGT has shown higher recent volatility (19.1%) compared to VOO (12.1%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VGT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 59.60 | 53.19 |
| 50-Day MA | $121.92 | $705.77 |
| 200-Day MA | $107.41 | $664.77 |
VGT exhibits stronger current technical momentum compared to VOO. VGT's RSI stands at 59.6, indicating solid upward momentum without being overbought, while VOO's RSI is at 53.19, suggesting a more neutral trend. Both ETFs have positive MACD values, with VGT at 2.18 and VOO at 2.87, but VGT's upward trajectory appears more pronounced relative to its price scale. VGT's price is trading above its 20-day EMA ($125.75), 50-day SMA ($121.92), and 200-day SMA ($107.41), confirming a strong uptrend. VOO is also trading above its key moving averages (20-day EMA $708.10, 50-day SMA $705.77, 200-day SMA $664.77), but VGT's indicators suggest a more immediate bullish bias.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VGT
Technical Score: 78/100
VOO
Technical Score: 75/100
As ETFs, VGT and VOO do not have analyst ratings or median price targets in the same way individual stocks do. Sentiment is therefore inferred from price action and technical indicators. VGT's stronger technical signals, including a higher RSI and its position relative to moving averages, suggest a more positive current market sentiment. VOO's sentiment appears more neutral, reflecting its broad market exposure and less aggressive price action in the immediate term. The higher dividend yield of VOO might attract income-focused investors, providing a baseline level of demand.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VGT | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 0.84 |
The primary risk for VGT is its heavy concentration in the technology sector. Any downturn in technology stocks, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or shifts in consumer spending, could disproportionately impact VGT. Its performance is highly dependent on the continued success and growth of a relatively narrow group of companies. VOO's risk is more diversified, reflecting the overall economic health. However, it is susceptible to broad market downturns, economic recessions, and systemic risks affecting the entire S&P 500. A significant risk for VOO is underperformance relative to more focused growth sectors like technology if the market leadership shifts away from broad market indices.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VGT if you have a high-risk tolerance and believe the technology sector will continue its growth trajectory.
- VOO is a suitable core holding for most portfolios due to its diversification and low cost, especially for long-term investors.
- For a balanced approach, consider holding both VGT and VOO, allocating based on your desired exposure to technology versus the broader market.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $127.98
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$121.58
Aggressive
$127.98
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$117.93
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$127.66
+10%
$133.74
+15%
$139.82
VOO
Current: $715.59
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$679.81
Aggressive
$715.59
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$659.42
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$713.80
+10%
$747.79
+15%
$781.78
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VGT based on technical setup. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, VGT or VOO?+
VGT is a better buy for investors seeking aggressive growth driven by the technology sector, supported by stronger current technical momentum. VOO is a better buy for those prioritizing broad market diversification, lower costs, and a higher dividend yield.
What are the key risks for VGT vs VOO?+
VGT's main risk is its concentration in the technology sector, making it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns. VOO's risk is tied to the broader market and economic cycles, offering diversification but potentially lower upside in strong sector-led rallies.
Which ETF has a lower expense ratio?+
VOO has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to VGT's 0.09%, making VOO a more cost-effective choice for long-term investors.
How do their dividend yields compare?+
VOO offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 1.04% compared to VGT's yield of about 0.37%.
Which ETF has shown better recent performance?+
Based on technical indicators like RSI and proximity to 52-week highs, VGT appears to have stronger recent momentum, driven by its technology focus.
What is the primary sector exposure for each ETF?+
VGT is almost entirely concentrated in the Technology sector (99.27%). VOO is broadly diversified, with Technology being its largest sector at 38.72%, followed by Healthcare and Financials.
How do their 10-year trailing returns compare?+
VGT has delivered stronger 10-year trailing returns of 24.72% compared to VOO's 15.29%, highlighting the long-term growth potential of its sector focus.