TradeTrade
Jump to any asset

VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs iShares Semiconductor ETF

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF NASDAQ

$574.29 ▲ 0.10%
VS

SOXX

iShares Semiconductor ETF NASDAQ

$519.70 ▼ 2.31%
Last updated: (1m ago) • SMH at $574.29, SOXX at $519.70
CleaRank Financial AIData from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

SMH wins this head-to-head comparison against SOXX, primarily driven by its stronger recent momentum and superior long-term performance across multiple timeframes. While both ETFs track the semiconductor industry, SMH demonstrates a more compelling growth trajectory and better risk-adjusted returns over extended periods. SOXX, though a significant player, lags SMH in key performance indicators, particularly in its longer-term trailing returns and current technical positioning. Investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector would find SMH to be the more advantageous choice based on its current standing and historical performance. SMH's current price of $574.29 is trading above its 20-day EMA ($563.85) and 50-day SMA ($572.05), indicating positive short-term momentum. Its RSI of 56.2 suggests it is in a healthy growth phase without being overbought. In contrast, SOXX's price of $519.70 is below its 20-day EMA ($520.83) and 50-day SMA ($533.03), signaling weaker short-term momentum. SOXX's RSI of 49.02 indicates a more neutral to slightly bearish stance. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) exhibits a more favorable technical profile and historical performance, making it the preferred selection.

Key Differentiator

The key differentiator between SMH and SOXX is SMH's superior long-term performance and more consistently positive technical indicators. While SOXX has shown stronger recent YTD and 1-year returns, SMH's established track record over 3, 5, and 10 years indicates a more resilient and effective investment vehicle for the semiconductor sector. SMH's current technical setup, with prices above key moving averages and a strong CCI, also presents a more favorable immediate outlook compared to SOXX's weaker technical signals.

Joint Outlook

The outlook for both SMH and SOXX remains tied to the cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry, influenced by global economic growth, technological innovation, and geopolitical stability. SMH is expected to continue benefiting from its strong long-term performance and positive technical momentum, potentially outperforming SOXX if the sector experiences sustained growth. Its current positioning above key moving averages suggests resilience in the near term. SOXX's outlook is more uncertain given its weaker long-term track record and less constructive current technicals. While it has shown strong recent performance, a sustained downturn in the semiconductor market could expose its vulnerabilities. Investors should be prepared for potential volatility, with SMH likely offering a more stable investment profile due to its historical consistency and stronger technical setup. A significant shift in global tech demand or supply chain disruptions could negatively impact both ETFs.

Price Analysis Comparison

Asset Metrics i

Asset Metrics: SMH vs SOXX
Metric SMH SOXX
52 Week Range $295.11 - $671.83 $251.86 - $655.95
Prev. Close $573.73 $532.00
Market Cap 5.91B 3.48B
24h Volume 3.46M 4.28K
SMH, with a current price of $574.29, is trading above its 50-day SMA of $572.05 and its 200-day SMA of $479.77, suggesting a positive trend. Its 52-week range is $295.11 to $671.83, placing it closer to its 52-week high. SOXX, priced at $519.70, is trading below its 50-day SMA of $533.03 and its 200-day SMA of $435.30, indicating a weaker trend. SOXX's 52-week range is $251.86 to $655.95, also positioning it closer to its 52-week high, but its current price action is less constructive than SMH's. SMH's CCI of 128.36 indicates strong upward momentum, while SOXX's CCI of 46.07 suggests more moderate momentum. The Stochastic Oscillator for SMH at 84.49 is nearing overbought territory, which in a strong trend can persist, while SOXX's Stochastic at 66.99 is in a more neutral range. These technical indicators collectively favor SMH's current market position.

Market Performance i

Market Performance: SMH vs SOXX
Metric SMH SOXX
Volatility (30D) 43.83% 43.35%
24h Range $569.90 - $577.57 $518.25 - $519.91
Market Strength (RSI) 56.2 49.0
Trend (SMA 50) Bullish Bearish
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~44%). SMH is in a Bullish trend, while SOXX remains Bearish relative to its 50-day average.

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: SMH vs SOXX
Indicator SMH SOXX
RSI (14) 56.20 49.02
50-Day MA $572.05 $533.03
200-Day MA $479.77 $435.30
SMH is exhibiting stronger upward momentum, with its price trading above its 20-day EMA ($563.85) and 50-day SMA ($572.05), supported by a CCI of 128.36. Its RSI of 56.2 indicates a healthy trend without being overextended. The Stochastic Oscillator at 84.49 is approaching overbought levels, which in a strong uptrend can persist, signaling continued strength. SMH's 52-week range is $295.11 to $671.83, and it is currently trading closer to its high, confirming its bullish technical posture. SOXX, conversely, shows weaker technical signals. Its price is below its 20-day EMA ($520.83) and 50-day SMA ($533.03), with a CCI of 46.07 and an RSI of 49.02, indicating a more neutral to slightly bearish trend. Its Stochastic Oscillator at 66.99 is in a more moderate range. SOXX's 52-week range is $251.86 to $655.95, and while also closer to its high, its current technical indicators suggest less immediate upside potential compared to SMH.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

SMH

Buy
Technical Score: 78/100

SOXX

Buy
Technical Score: 75/100
As both SMH and SOXX are ETFs and do not have analyst ratings or median targets, sentiment must be inferred from price action and technical indicators. SMH's positive technicals, including its price being above key moving averages and a strong CCI reading, suggest a bullish sentiment among market participants. The RSI of 56.2 further supports this, indicating investor confidence and buying interest. SOXX's technical indicators present a more mixed sentiment. Its price below key moving averages and a neutral RSI of 49.02 suggest a lack of strong conviction from investors. While its Stochastic Oscillator is not in oversold territory, the overall technical picture for SOXX points to a less enthusiastic market sentiment compared to SMH.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: SMH vs SOXX
Metric SMH SOXX
Sharpe Ratio 1.00 0.89
The primary risk for SMH lies in the potential for a sharp downturn in the semiconductor sector, which could be triggered by slowing global demand, increased geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains, or a significant technological disruption. Its current position near its 52-week high also means it has less room for immediate upside and could be more susceptible to pullbacks if market sentiment shifts. Furthermore, its slightly higher expense ratio of 0.35% represents a drag on long-term returns compared to SOXX. SOXX faces similar sector-specific risks, including cyclical downturns in semiconductor demand and supply chain disruptions. Its weaker technical indicators and lower long-term trailing returns compared to SMH suggest it may be more vulnerable to underperforming if the sector experiences a broad correction. The slightly lower expense ratio of 0.33% offers a minor cost advantage, but this is outweighed by its less favorable historical performance and weaker current technical setup. Both ETFs are concentrated in the technology sector, increasing their sensitivity to sector-specific headwinds.

Comparative ProTips

  • Consider SMH for its stronger long-term performance and more favorable current technical indicators, suggesting sustained growth potential.
  • While SOXX offers a slightly lower expense ratio, SMH's historical outperformance justifies its marginally higher cost for investors prioritizing long-term capital appreciation.
  • Monitor semiconductor sector demand and supply chain dynamics, as these macro factors will significantly influence the performance of both SMH and SOXX.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
SMH
Current: $574.29
ENTRY ZONES
$545.58
$574.29
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$529.21
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$572.85
+10%
$600.13
+15%
$627.41
SOXX
Current: $519.70
ENTRY ZONES
$493.72
$519.70
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$478.90
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$518.40
+10%
$543.09
+15%
$567.77
ℹ️ Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored SMH based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which semiconductor ETF is a better buy, SMH or SOXX?+
SMH is the preferred buy due to its stronger long-term performance and more favorable current technical indicators. While SOXX has shown stronger recent returns, SMH's consistent growth over multiple years and positive momentum make it a more compelling choice for investors.
What are the key risks for SMH versus SOXX?+
Both ETFs face risks from semiconductor sector cyclicality, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical factors. SMH's risk includes its slightly higher expense ratio (0.35%) and potential for pullback from its 52-week high, while SOXX's risks are amplified by its weaker long-term performance and less constructive current technicals.
How do SMH and SOXX compare in terms of cost?+
SOXX has a slightly lower expense ratio at 0.33% compared to SMH's 0.35%. This means SOXX costs $33 per $10,000 invested annually, versus $35 for SMH, making SOXX marginally cheaper.
Which ETF has delivered better long-term returns?+
SMH has delivered superior long-term returns, outperforming SOXX in the 5-year (33.48% vs 27.79%) and 10-year (33.85% vs 31.56%) periods. This indicates greater consistency and growth over extended market cycles.
How do their current technicals compare?+
SMH shows stronger technicals, with its price above key moving averages (20-day EMA, 50-day SMA) and a high CCI (128.36), suggesting positive momentum. SOXX's technicals are weaker, with its price below its 20-day EMA and 50-day SMA, and a lower CCI (46.07).
What is the sector concentration for SMH and SOXX?+
Both SMH and SOXX are heavily concentrated in the Technology sector, with 100% of their holdings allocated to technology companies, reflecting their focus on the semiconductor industry.
How do their Year-to-Date returns compare?+
SOXX has outperformed SMH on a Year-to-Date basis, with a return of 69.94% compared to SMH's 54.56%. This suggests SOXX has captured recent market gains more effectively.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of SMH vs SOXX is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on September 10, 2026.