Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock
Zscaler vs Fortinet
The short version
How ZS and FTNT compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.
The verdict
ZS and FTNT on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.
Price, side by side
Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.
Rebased price
Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.
Over 1 year: ZS lost 27.0% and FTNT gained 119.0%, a gap of 145.9 points in FTNT's favour.
Valuation and profitability
What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.
Valuation and profitability
What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.
Valuation
Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.
Profitability
How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.
Earnings reality check
Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.
ZS
No reliable earnings figures in our data.
FTNT
Beat the estimate in 7 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 3 of those beats.
Momentum and sentiment
The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.
Momentum and sentiment
The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.
Risk and practical tips
How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.
Risk
How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.
- Consider Fortinet (FTNT) for its established profitability and consistent earnings, offering a more defensive profile within the cybersecurity sector.
- Monitor Zscaler's (ZS) path to profitability; continued strong revenue growth coupled with improving margins could justify its current valuation and analyst optimism.
- Given the differing analyst sentiment, FTNT may offer value if it can sustain profitability, while ZS presents a higher growth, higher risk opportunity.
Long-term scenarios
Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.
Simulated growth of $10,000
Thousands of paths from each price history: the median and the 90th percentile for each.
In the median simulated path, $10,000 in ZS grows to about $28,100 and $10,000 in FTNT to about $30,400 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.
Trade plans for both
Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Note: The AI favored FTNT based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While ZS currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (73 vs 52), the AI favors FTNT on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
Questions people ask
Answered from the figures on this page.
