Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Zscaler vs Fortinet
VS
Comparative Analysis
Fortinet (FTNT) wins this head-to-head comparison against Zscaler (ZS), primarily driven by its superior profitability and stronger current technical momentum. While Zscaler shows strong revenue growth, Fortinet demonstrates a significantly healthier financial profile with exceptional net profit and return on equity margins. Fortinet's current price action also exhibits stronger upward momentum, trading closer to its 52-week high and showing more favorable technical indicators. Investors seeking a more financially sound cybersecurity act with better current performance should favor Fortinet.
Key Differentiator
Fortinet's (FTNT) decisive advantage lies in its proven and exceptional profitability. While Zscaler (ZS) is growing rapidly, Fortinet is demonstrating the ability to translate that growth into substantial profits and returns for shareholders. This financial strength provides a more stable foundation and reduces reliance on future growth assumptions alone.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for Fortinet (FTNT) appears more favorable in the near term due to its strong profitability and positive technical momentum. It is well-positioned to continue its growth trajectory, potentially outperforming Zscaler (ZS) if market sentiment favors profitable companies. Zscaler (ZS) has a strong growth narrative, but its path to profitability presents a key variable; a sustained slowdown in growth or failure to reach profitability could lead to underperformance. Over the next 6-12 months, FTNT is expected to maintain its upward trend, while ZS's performance will be heavily influenced by its ability to convert revenue growth into positive earnings.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -494.95 | 63.36 |
| Market Cap | 31.48B | 127.27B |
| Price/Sales | 10.43 | 17.42 |
| Price/Book | 13.46 | 84.52 |
| EV/EBITDA | 760.80 | 49.15 |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
Fortinet (FTNT) trades at a P/E ratio of 63.36, which is considerably higher than Zscaler (ZS), which has a negative P/E due to its current net loss. However, Zscaler's revenue growth of 24.9% is slightly lower than Fortinet's 25.6%. Zscaler's market capitalization is approximately $31.5 billion, while Fortinet's is significantly larger at nearly $127.3 billion. Despite the higher P/E, Fortinet's substantial profitability metrics suggest its valuation is supported by strong earnings generation, whereas Zscaler's valuation is based more on future growth potential and current revenue expansion.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 24.90% | 25.60% |
| Profit Margin | -1.89% | 28.17% |
| Return on Equity | -2.87% | 117.44% |
| Return on Assets | -1.03% | 14.17% |
| Debt/Equity | 71.89 | 36.19 |
Fortinet (FTNT) exhibits outstanding profitability, boasting a net profit margin of 28.17% and a return on equity of 117.44%. Its return on assets stands strong at 14.17%. In contrast, Zscaler (ZS) operates with a negative net profit margin of -1.89%, a negative return on equity of -2.87%, and a negative return on assets of -1.03%. Fortinet's financial efficiency and ability to generate profit are vastly superior to Zscaler's.
Earnings Reality Check
ZS
Earnings data unavailable. No recent report data found.
FTNT
Last 5 Qs: FTNT beat estimates 4x out of 5. Rose 3x after beats.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.59 | 70.24 |
| 50-Day MA | $173.85 | $161.56 |
| 200-Day MA | $167.43 | $116.18 |
Fortinet (FTNT) shows stronger current technical momentum, with an RSI of 70.24, indicating it is approaching overbought territory but within a strong uptrend. Its price is trading above its 50-day ($161.56) and 200-day ($116.18) moving averages, confirming a bullish trend. Zscaler (ZS) has an RSI of 62.59, suggesting solid momentum but less aggressive than Fortinet. Zscaler's price is also above its 50-day ($173.85) and 200-day ($167.43) moving averages. Both stocks are in uptrends, but FTNT's indicators suggest a more immediate strength.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
ZS
Technical Score: 74/100
FTNT
Technical Score: 53/100
Analyst sentiment is mixed but leans towards 'Buy' for both companies, though with differing distributions. Fortinet (FTNT) has 1 Strong Buy, 8 Buys, 31 Holds, 3 Sells, and 1 Strong Sell from 44 analysts, with a median target price of $165. Zscaler (ZS) has a more bullish analyst consensus with 8 Strong Buys, 29 Buys, 9 Holds, and 0 Sells from 46 analysts, and a higher median target price of $210. Despite Zscaler's more positive analyst ratings, Fortinet's current price action and profitability suggest a more reliable investment at this moment.
Note: While ZS shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Buy 74/100), the AI comparative analysis favors FTNT (Hold 53/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 0.95 | 1.06 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.21 | 1.25 |
For Fortinet (FTNT), the primary risk lies in its high valuation multiples and the potential for increased competition in the cybersecurity space to pressure its margins. A slowdown in its revenue growth or a shift in customer spending could impact its premium valuation. Zscaler (ZS) faces significant risks related to its current lack of profitability, making it highly dependent on continued strong revenue growth and future margin expansion to justify its market capitalization. Any deceleration in growth or failure to achieve profitability could lead to a sharp valuation correction.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider Fortinet (FTNT) for its demonstrated profitability and strong current technicals, offering a more stable investment profile.
- Zscaler (ZS) remains a growth-oriented act; monitor its path to profitability and sustained revenue expansion closely.
- The cybersecurity sector remains competitive; evaluate both companies' ability to innovate and maintain market share.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
ZS
Current: $193.05
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$183.40
Aggressive
$193.05
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$177.90
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$192.57
+10%
$201.74
+15%
$210.91
FTNT
Current: $173.46
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$164.79
Aggressive
$173.46
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$159.84
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$173.03
+10%
$181.27
+15%
$189.51
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (ZS). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices. Note: The AI favored FTNT based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While ZS currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (74 vs 53), the AI favors FTNT on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, FTNT or ZS?+
Fortinet (FTNT) is the preferred buy due to its superior profitability and stronger current technical momentum, despite Zscaler (ZS) having more bullish analyst ratings. FTNT's net profit margin is 28.17% compared to ZS's negative margin.
What are the key risks for FTNT vs ZS?+
FTNT's main risk is its premium valuation and competitive pressures, while ZS's key risk is its current unprofitability and dependence on sustained high growth to achieve future profitability.
How do FTNT and ZS compare on profitability?+
Fortinet (FTNT) is vastly more profitable, with a net profit margin of 28.17% and a return on equity of 117.44%, whereas Zscaler (ZS) operates at a net loss with negative margins.
What is the revenue growth comparison between FTNT and ZS?+
Both companies show strong revenue growth, with FTNT at 25.6% and ZS at 24.9%. The difference is marginal, but FTNT achieves this growth while being highly profitable.
How do the technicals compare for FTNT and ZS?+
FTNT exhibits stronger current technical momentum with a higher RSI (70.24 vs 62.59) and is trading robustly above its key moving averages, indicating a more immediate uptrend.
What is the analyst sentiment for FTNT and ZS?+
Analysts are more bullish on Zscaler (ZS) with more 'Buy' ratings and a higher median target price. However, Fortinet (FTNT) also receives significant 'Buy' and 'Hold' ratings, supported by its strong fundamentals.
How does FTNT's valuation compare to ZS?+
FTNT has a P/E of 63.36, while ZS has a negative P/E. ZS has a lower market cap but is not yet profitable, making FTNT's valuation more grounded in current earnings.