Jump to any asset 724 assets, updated daily
Zscaler vs Fortinet
VS
Last updated: (1m ago) • ZS at $178.19, FTNT at $161.60
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.
Comparative Analysis
Fortinet (FTNT) emerges as the superior investment over Zscaler (ZS) based on its robust profitability and stronger fundamental metrics. FTNT demonstrates significantly higher net profit margins and returns on equity and assets, indicating superior operational efficiency and capital allocation. While both companies exhibit strong revenue growth, FTNT's ability to translate that growth into profit is currently more compelling. ZS, despite its growth potential, operates at a net loss and shows negative returns, presenting a higher risk profile in the current environment. FTNT's established profitability provides a more stable foundation for future returns.
Key Differentiator
The decisive factor separating Fortinet (FTNT) and Zscaler (ZS) is profitability. FTNT consistently generates strong profits and returns, demonstrating a mature and efficient business model. ZS, while showing impressive revenue growth, remains unprofitable, making its valuation more speculative and its future returns less certain. FTNT's ability to convert growth into tangible shareholder value is the key differentiator.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for Fortinet (FTNT) appears more stable and promising due to its strong profitability and established market position. We anticipate continued solid performance driven by its efficient operations and consistent earnings generation. Zscaler (ZS) faces a more uncertain outlook; its success hinges on achieving profitability while maintaining its high growth trajectory. Any deceleration in growth or failure to improve margins could lead to significant downside risk. Over the next 6-12 months, FTNT is expected to deliver more consistent returns, while ZS remains a higher-risk, higher-reward proposition.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | -654.52 | 56.41 |
| Market Cap | 28.57B | 120.48B |
| Price/Sales | 8.90 | 15.56 |
| Price/Book | 11.94 | 75.52 |
| EV/EBITDA | -421.18 | 43.77 |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
Fortinet (FTNT) presents a more attractive valuation profile despite a higher P/E ratio of 56.41 compared to Zscaler (ZS) which has a non-meaningful P/E. FTNT's profitability allows its P/E to be supported by actual earnings, whereas ZS's P/E is not applicable due to its unprofitability. FTNT's market capitalization of $120.5 billion is substantially larger than ZS's $28.6 billion, suggesting greater market acceptance and scale. Given FTNT's demonstrated ability to generate profits, its valuation appears more justified than ZS's growth-focused, loss-making approach.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 25.40% | 25.60% |
| Profit Margin | -2.44% | 28.17% |
| Return on Equity | -3.71% | 117.44% |
| Return on Assets | -1.36% | 14.17% |
| Debt/Equity | 78.94 | 36.19 |
Fortinet (FTNT) significantly outperforms Zscaler (ZS) in profitability metrics. FTNT reports a net profit margin of 28.17%, a return on equity of 117.44%, and a return on assets of 14.17%. Zscaler (ZS), conversely, shows a negative net profit margin of -2.44%, a negative return on equity of -3.71%, and a negative return on assets of -1.36%. These figures clearly indicate FTNT's superior ability to generate profits and efficiently utilize its assets and shareholder capital.
Earnings Reality Check
ZS
Last 4 Qs: ZS beat estimates 4x out of 4. Fell 2x after beats. (Sell the news?)
FTNT
Last 5 Qs: FTNT beat estimates 4x out of 5. Rose 3x after beats.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 73.34 | 57.39 |
| 50-Day MA | $142.38 | $153.56 |
| 200-Day MA | $185.82 | $102.93 |
Fortinet (FTNT) exhibits a more balanced technical profile, trading at $161.60, which is above its 50-day SMA of $153.56 but below its 20-day EMA of $158.86, suggesting recent consolidation. Its RSI of 57.39 indicates healthy momentum without being overbought. Zscaler (ZS), trading at $178.19, shows stronger upward momentum with an RSI of 73.34, nearing overbought territory, and its price is above both its 50-day SMA ($142.38) and 20-day EMA ($154.96). However, ZS is trading below its 200-day SMA ($185.82), indicating potential resistance, while FTNT is trading well above its 200-day SMA ($102.93).
AI Analyst Sentiment
ZS
Hold
Technical Score: 55/100
FTNT
Buy
Technical Score: 75/100
While specific analyst ratings and institutional positioning data are not provided, the market capitalization difference suggests FTNT ($120.5B) is a more established player with broader institutional adoption compared to ZS ($28.6B). FTNT's profitability likely attracts a wider range of investors seeking stable growth, whereas ZS may appeal more to growth-focused funds willing to tolerate near-term losses for long-term potential. The current price action for ZS shows stronger short-term momentum, but FTNT's established market presence and profitability suggest a more sustainable investor base.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | ZS | FTNT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 0.92 | 1.06 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.30 | 1.22 |
The primary risk for Zscaler (ZS) is its continued unprofitability and negative returns on equity and assets, which could lead to investor fatigue if growth slows or competitive pressures intensify. Its high RSI also suggests a potential for a short-term pullback. Fortinet (FTNT)'s main risk lies in its valuation, which, while supported by profits, is still substantial. A slowdown in cybersecurity spending or increased competition could pressure its growth trajectory and stock price, despite its current profitability advantage.
Comparative ProTips
- Prioritize profitability and established earnings when assessing cybersecurity stocks, favoring FTNT's demonstrated financial health over ZS's growth-at-all-costs model.
- Monitor ZS's path to profitability closely; a sustained inability to convert revenue growth into positive net income could trigger a significant revaluation.
- Consider FTNT's larger market capitalization as a sign of stability and broader market acceptance, potentially offering a more defensive growth position compared to ZS.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
ZS
Current: $178.19
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$169.28
Aggressive
$178.19
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$164.20
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$177.74
+10%
$186.20
+15%
$194.67
FTNT
Current: $161.60
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$153.52
Aggressive
$161.60
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$148.91
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$161.20
+10%
$168.87
+15%
$176.55
Calculate Your Trade
ℹ️ Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored FTNT based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.