TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

Zscaler vs Fortinet

Stock·NASDAQ

Zscaler Inc. ZS

$220.43 ▼ 0.16%
Buy
73 / 100 AI score
Full ZS analysis →
vs

Stock·NASDAQ

Fortinet, Inc. FTNT

$181.91 ▼ 1.16%
Hold
52 / 100 AI score
Full FTNT analysis →
01

The short version

How ZS and FTNT compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

ZS and FTNT on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours FTNT
ZS FTNT
73/100 AI score 52/100
-26.3% 1-year change +118.8%
58.2% Volatility (30d, yearly) 31.0%
60.6 RSI (14-day) 53.4
N/A P/E ratio 65.0x
0.00% Dividend yield 0.00%
The verdict
Fortinet (FTNT) wins this head-to-head comparison against Zscaler (ZS) primarily due to its superior profitability and consistent earnings beats. While Zscaler shows strong revenue growth and a more bullish analyst sentiment, Fortinet's established profitability, higher returns on equity and assets, and a history of exceeding earnings expectations give it a more solid foundation. Fortinet's current technicals are also more neutral, suggesting less immediate downside risk compared to Zscaler's slightly more extended momentum. Despite Zscaler's higher market capitalization and impressive revenue growth rate, Fortinet's net profit margin is significantly higher, and its return on equity and assets are substantially better. This indicates Fortinet is more efficient at converting revenue into profit and generating returns for shareholders. The market appears to recognize this, with Fortinet's stock showing a more balanced technical profile despite a lower median analyst target.
Key difference
The most significant differentiator between Fortinet (FTNT) and Zscaler (ZS) is profitability. Fortinet demonstrates strong and consistent profitability with impressive net profit margins and returns on equity and assets, while Zscaler is currently unprofitable. This fundamental difference in financial health provides a more stable investment profile for Fortinet, even if Zscaler exhibits higher growth potential and more bullish analyst targets.
Outlook
The outlook for Fortinet (FTNT) appears stable, supported by its strong profitability and market position, though analyst sentiment suggests limited near-term upside. Its established business model provides a solid foundation for continued, albeit potentially slower, growth. Zscaler (ZS) has a more speculative outlook, heavily reliant on continued high revenue growth and its eventual transition to profitability. If it can execute on its growth strategy and achieve positive earnings, the upside could be substantial, but the risk of a correction if growth falters or profitability remains elusive is significant.
NEXT · 2Price, side by side →
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
ZS FTNT

Over 1 year: ZS lost 27.0% and FTNT gained 119.0%, a gap of 145.9 points in FTNT's favour.

NEXT · 3Valuation and profitability →
03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

ZS FTNT
$35.9B Market cap $133.5B
N/A P/E ratio 65.0x
10.7x Price / sales 17.9x
13.8x Price / book 87.1x
783x EV / EBITDA 50.7x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

ZS FTNT
+24.9% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +25.6%
-1.9% Net margin 28.2%
-2.9% Return on equity 117.4%
-1.0% Return on assets 14.2%
0.72 Debt / equity 0.36
On valuation
Zscaler's lack of a P/E ratio suggests it is not yet profitable on a trailing twelve-month basis, a key differentiator. Zscaler's market capitalization stands at $35.94 billion, while Fortinet's is substantially larger at $133.47 billion. This larger market cap for Fortinet reflects its more mature business and established market position. Despite the higher P/E, Fortinet's profitability metrics suggest its valuation is supported by strong earnings generation.
On profitability
Fortinet (FTNT) exhibits significantly superior profitability compared to Zscaler (ZS). FTNT boasts a net profit margin of 28.17%, a return on equity of 117.44%, and a return on assets of 14.17%. These figures highlight Fortinet's efficiency in generating profits from its operations and shareholder capital. In contrast, Zscaler (ZS) operates with a negative net profit margin of -1.89%, a negative return on equity of -2.87%, and a negative return on assets of -1.03%. This indicates that Zscaler is currently loss-making and less efficient in its capital utilization, making Fortinet the clear winner on profitability metrics.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

ZS

No reliable earnings figures in our data.

FTNT

Beat the estimate in 7 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 3 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Nov '24May '25Nov '25Jul '26
NEXT · 4Momentum and sentiment →
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

ZS FTNT
73/100 AI score 52/100
60.6 RSI (14-day) 53.4
+15.4% Price against 50-day average +7.5%
+32.8% Price against 200-day average +47.4%
Technicals
Fortinet (FTNT) is currently trading at $181.91, with its 20-day EMA at $181.85 and its 50-day SMA at $169.21. The price is slightly above its 20-day EMA and comfortably above its 50-day and 200-day SMAs, suggesting a stable uptrend. Its RSI is at 53.43, indicating neutral momentum, and its Stochastic is at 44.80, also suggesting a lack of overbought or oversold conditions. Zscaler (ZS) is trading at $220.43, with its 20-day EMA at $209.83 and its 50-day SMA at $191.09. The price is trading above both its 20-day EMA and 50-day SMA, confirming an uptrend. ZS's RSI is at 60.64, indicating firm upward momentum, and its Stochastic is at 66.11, suggesting it is in the upper range of neutral momentum but not yet overbought. While both show uptrends, FTNT's more neutral technical indicators suggest less immediate risk of a pullback.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment is divided, with Fortinet (FTNT) having a median target of $165, which is below its current price of $181.91, suggesting a potential downside according to the median analyst view. The ratings are heavily skewed towards 'Hold' (30 out of 44 analysts), with only 9 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings. Zscaler (ZS) has a median analyst target of $242.50, which is above its current price of $220.43, indicating positive sentiment from analysts. The ratings are more bullish, with 36 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 46 analysts. This suggests that while analysts see more upside potential in ZS, they are more cautious on FTNT.
NEXT · 5Risk and practical tips →
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

ZS FTNT
58.2% Volatility (30d, yearly) 31.0%
0.94 Beta against the S&P 500 1.04
0.44 Sharpe ratio 1.16
Risk
Fortinet (FTNT) faces the primary risk of its median analyst target ($165) being below its current trading price ($181.91), suggesting analysts anticipate a potential decline. Additionally, its large market capitalization means that achieving substantial growth may become more challenging compared to smaller competitors. Zscaler (ZS) carries the significant risk of its current unprofitability, as indicated by its negative net profit margin, return on equity, and return on assets. This reliance on future growth to achieve profitability exposes it to higher risk if market conditions change or competitive pressures intensify. Its higher RSI and Stochastic readings also suggest a greater potential for a short-term pullback if momentum falters.
ProTips
  1. Consider Fortinet (FTNT) for its established profitability and consistent earnings, offering a more defensive profile within the cybersecurity sector.
  2. Monitor Zscaler's (ZS) path to profitability; continued strong revenue growth coupled with improving margins could justify its current valuation and analyst optimism.
  3. Given the differing analyst sentiment, FTNT may offer value if it can sustain profitability, while ZS presents a higher growth, higher risk opportunity.
NEXT · 6Long-term scenarios →
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

Thousands of paths from each price history: the median and the 90th percentile for each.

202620282030203220342036
ZS median ZS 90th FTNT median FTNT 90th
ZS FTNT
$3,702 Downside, 2036 (10th) $5,696
$28,086 Base case, 2036 (median) $30,382
$213,082 Upside, 2036 (90th) $162,047

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in ZS grows to about $28,100 and $10,000 in FTNT to about $30,400 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

NEXT · 7Trade plans for both →
07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
ZS
Current: $220.43
ENTRY ZONES
$209.41
$220.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$203.13
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$231.45
+10% from current
$242.47
+15% from current
$253.49
FTNT
Current: $181.91
ENTRY ZONES
$172.81
$181.91
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$167.63
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$191.01
+10% from current
$200.10
+15% from current
$209.20
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (ZS). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices.

Note: The AI favored FTNT based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While ZS currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (73 vs 52), the AI favors FTNT on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
NEXT · 8Questions people ask →
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do FTNT and ZS compare on profitability?+
Fortinet (FTNT) is significantly more profitable, with a 28.17% net profit margin and strong returns on equity and assets, whereas Zscaler (ZS) is currently unprofitable with negative margins and returns.
What is the valuation difference between FTNT and ZS?+
Zscaler (ZS) has no P/E ratio as it is not currently profitable, while Fortinet (FTNT) trades at a P/E of 65.04. Both show strong revenue growth, but FTNT's valuation is supported by its profitability.
Does either FTNT or ZS pay a dividend?+
Neither Fortinet (FTNT) nor Zscaler (ZS) currently pay a dividend, as indicated by their 0% dividend yield.
How have ZS and FTNT performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 16, 2026, ZS's price fell 26.3% and FTNT's rose 118.8%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, ZS or FTNT?+
ZS has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 16, 2026, ZS's annualized volatility was 58.2% and FTNT's 31.0%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do ZS and FTNT move together?+
Yes, moderately: over roughly the past year to October 16, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +0.56 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both spreads the risk more than owning either alone.
NEXT · 9Keep exploring →

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of ZS vs FTNT is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 16, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.