TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

MarketAxess vs Tradeweb Markets Inc. Class A

Stock·NASDAQ

MarketAxess Holdings Inc MKTX

$164.64 ▲ 0.06%
Buy
68 / 100 AI score
Full MKTX analysis →
vs

Stock·NASDAQ

Tradeweb Markets Inc. TW

$113.49 ▲ 1.33%
Buy
70 / 100 AI score
Full TW analysis →
01

The short version

How MKTX and TW compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

MKTX and TW on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours MKTX
MKTX TW
68/100 AI score 70/100
-3.9% 1-year change +6.1%
1.5% Volatility (30d, yearly) 27.3%
77.9 RSI (14-day) 70.7
19.4x P/E ratio 26.3x
1.88% Dividend yield 0.48%
The verdict
While TW shows higher revenue growth (9% vs -0.5%), MKTX's ability to convert revenue into profit is more pronounced. Also, MKTX trades at a lower P/E ratio (19.45) than TW (26.29), suggesting it is more attractively priced relative to its earnings. Both companies exhibit strong analyst sentiment, but MKTX's fundamental strengths in profitability and valuation give it the edge.
Key difference
Despite TW's higher revenue growth, MKTX demonstrates a greater ability to translate sales into bottom-line profits, making it a more efficient and potentially more resilient investment.
Outlook
The outlook for MKTX is cautiously optimistic, supported by its strong profitability and attractive valuation. While its revenue growth has recently stalled, its efficient operations and solid dividend should provide a floor. A potential catalyst for upside could be a renewed focus on top-line growth or continued margin expansion. TW faces a more mixed outlook. Its strong revenue growth is a positive, but its higher valuation and less efficient margins present headwinds. If TW can sustain its growth trajectory and improve profitability, it could see further upside, but it remains more sensitive to market sentiment shifts and potential growth disappointments.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
MKTX TW

Over 1 year: MKTX lost 4.0% and TW gained 5.2%, a gap of 9.2 points in TW's favour.

03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

MKTX TW
$5.8B Market cap $24.2B
19.4x P/E ratio 26.3x
6.7x Price / sales 10.8x
4.7x Price / book 3.5x
13.0x EV / EBITDA 15.5x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

MKTX TW
-0.5% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +9.0%
35.2% Net margin 40.7%
23.1% Return on equity 14.5%
10.2% Return on assets 12.5%
0.14 Debt / equity 0.02
On valuation
MKTX presents a more compelling valuation at a P/E ratio of 19.45, which is notably lower than TW's P/E of 26.29. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of MKTX's earnings compared to TW. While both stocks have positive earnings, MKTX's lower multiple indicates a potentially more undervalued position. Both companies have positive dividend yields, with MKTX offering 1.89% and TW offering 0.48%. MKTX's higher dividend yield, combined with its lower P/E, makes it a more attractive option for income-focused investors seeking value.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

MKTX

Beat the estimate in 7 of 7 reports; fell the next session after 4 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Feb '25Aug '25Feb '26Jul '26

TW

Beat the estimate in 5 of 6 reports; fell the next session after 2 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Apr '25Oct '25Jul '26
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

MKTX TW
68/100 AI score 70/100
77.9 RSI (14-day) 70.7
+0.8% Price against 50-day average +7.8%
+5.7% Price against 200-day average +4.6%
Technicals
MKTX is exhibiting strong bullish momentum, with its RSI at 77.88 and Stochastic at 90.62, both indicating the stock is in overbought territory. The price is trading above its key moving averages: the 20-day EMA at $163.96, the 50-day SMA at $163.31, and the 200-day SMA at $155.83, confirming an uptrend. TW is also showing strong upward momentum, with an RSI of 70.74 and Stochastic at 99.37, also signaling overbought conditions. Its price is above the 20-day EMA ($107.50), 50-day SMA ($105.23), and 200-day SMA ($108.48). While both are technically strong, MKTX's price action appears more firmly entrenched above its longer-term averages.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment is positive for both MKTX and TW, with a consensus 'Hold' rating for MKTX from 12 analysts and a median target price of $167, suggesting modest upside from its current price. TW garners stronger 'Buy' sentiment with 9 out of 16 analysts rating it as 'Strong Buy' or 'Buy', and a median target price of $118, indicating potential upside from its current level. Despite TW's slightly more bullish analyst ratings, MKTX's higher median target relative to its current price suggests a more favorable risk-reward profile from an analyst perspective.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

MKTX TW
1.5% Volatility (30d, yearly) 27.3%
0.79 Beta against the S&P 500 0.61
-0.45 Sharpe ratio -0.01
Risk
For MKTX, the primary risk lies in its current overbought technical conditions, with RSI and Stochastic readings suggesting a potential for a short-term correction. While its profitability is strong, a slowdown in revenue growth (currently -0.5%) could pressure earnings if not managed effectively. The median analyst target of $167 is only slightly above the current price, indicating limited immediate upside potential according to analysts. TW faces similar technical overbought risks, with its Stochastic indicator at 99.37. Its higher P/E ratio of 26.29 makes it more susceptible to valuation compression if growth expectations are not met. While its revenue growth is strong at 9%, its net profit margin is lower than MKTX's, indicating less efficient operations. The median analyst target of $118 offers a more substantial upside potential compared to MKTX.
ProTips
  1. Given the overbought technicals on both names, consider waiting for a minor pullback for optimal entry points.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
MKTX
Current: $164.64
ENTRY ZONES
$156.41
$164.64
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$151.72
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$172.87
+10% from current
$181.10
+15% from current
$189.34
TW
Current: $113.49
ENTRY ZONES
$107.82
$113.49
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$104.58
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$119.16
+10% from current
$124.84
+15% from current
$130.51
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored MKTX based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While TW currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (70 vs 68), the AI favors MKTX on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do MKTX and TW compare on valuation?+
MKTX is cheaper, trading at a P/E of 19.45 compared to TW's 26.29. MKTX also offers a higher dividend yield of 1.89% versus TW's 0.48%.
What is the earnings outlook for MKTX and TW?+
Both companies have a history of beating earnings estimates. MKTX's most recent quarter showed a larger EPS surprise (4.84%) than TW's (2.11%), suggesting potentially stronger earnings performance.
How have MKTX and TW performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 17, 2026, MKTX's price fell 3.9% and TW's rose 6.1%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, MKTX or TW?+
TW has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 17, 2026, MKTX's annualized volatility was 1.5% and TW's 27.3%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do MKTX and TW move together?+
Yes, loosely: over roughly the past year to October 17, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +0.15 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both spreads the risk more than owning either alone.
How far are MKTX and TW from their 52-week highs?+
As of October 17, 2026, MKTX is 16.0% below its 52-week high of $195.97 and TW is 11.1% below its high of $127.69.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of MKTX vs TW is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 17, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.