TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 849 assets, updated daily

NVIDIA vs Advanced Micro Devices

NVDA

NVIDIA Corporation NASDAQ

$225.07 ▲ 0.22%
VS

AMD

Advanced Micro Devices Inc NASDAQ

$630.63 ▲ 0.22%
Last updated: • NVDA at $225.07, AMD at $630.63
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

NVIDIA (NVDA) wins this head-to-head comparison against Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), primarily driven by its superior profitability and stronger revenue growth. While both companies operate in the high-growth semiconductor sector, NVDA demonstrates significantly higher net profit margins and return on equity, indicating more efficient operations and better shareholder value generation. AMD shows strong technical momentum, but NVDA's fundamental strength provides a more compelling investment case at this juncture. NVDA's ability to consistently beat earnings estimates, coupled with its impressive revenue expansion, solidifies its leadership position. AMD, while showing positive signs in its technicals and revenue growth, lags considerably in profitability metrics. The market appears to recognize NVDA's fundamental advantages, as reflected in analyst ratings and price action, making it the preferred choice for investors seeking strong performance in the AI-driven semiconductor market.

Key Differentiator

NVIDIA's (NVDA) decisive advantage lies in its superior profitability and market-leading net profit margins, which are more than four times higher than AMD's. This exceptional profitability, combined with a higher revenue growth rate and a more favorable P/E ratio relative to its growth, establishes NVDA as the fundamentally stronger investment. While AMD shows strong technical momentum, NVDA's strong financial performance and market dominance in AI hardware provide a more sustainable and compelling basis for investment.

Joint Outlook

The outlook for both NVIDIA (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) remains positive, driven by the ongoing demand for high-performance computing in AI and data centers. NVDA is expected to continue its dominance, leveraging its technological lead and strong ecosystem, though growth rates may moderate from their current extreme levels. Its profitability should remain a key strength, supporting its valuation. AMD is positioned for continued growth as it expands its product portfolio and market reach, particularly in CPUs and GPUs for AI applications. However, it faces the challenge of closing the profitability gap with NVDA and fending off competition. Investors should watch for AMD's ability to capture market share and improve margins to justify its higher valuation multiple.

Price Analysis Comparison

Valuation Metrics i

Valuation Metrics: NVDA vs AMD
Metric NVDA AMD
P/E Ratio 28.45 161.35
Market Cap 5.43T 1.03T
Price/Sales 17.94 24.87
Price/Book 23.73 15.28
EV/EBITDA 26.83 106.51
Dividend Yield 0.23% N/A
NVDA trades at a P/E ratio of 28.45, which is considerably lower than AMD's P/E of 161.35, suggesting NVDA is more attractively valued on a traditional earnings basis. Despite AMD's higher price, NVDA's market capitalization is substantially larger at $5.43 trillion compared to AMD's $1.03 trillion, reflecting its dominant market position and investor confidence. NVDA's revenue growth of 105.9% significantly outpaces AMD's 50.1%, indicating a faster expansion of its business. While AMD's price is near its 52-week high of $639, NVDA is trading closer to its 52-week high of $236.54, suggesting strong ongoing demand for both, but NVDA's valuation metrics are more favorable given its growth and profitability. NVDA's price action shows it trading above its 50-day ($215.98) and 200-day ($199.47) moving averages, confirming an uptrend. AMD is also trading above its 50-day ($504.71) and 200-day ($364.75) averages, indicating a strong upward trajectory. However, NVDA's P/E ratio presents a more compelling entry point relative to its growth prospects compared to AMD's significantly higher valuation multiple.

Profitability & Efficiency i

Profitability & Efficiency: NVDA vs AMD
Metric NVDA AMD
Rev. Growth (Qtly) 105.90% 50.10%
Profit Margin 63.66% 15.58%
Return on Equity 117.21% 10.20%
Return on Assets 53.57% 5.13%
Debt/Equity 16.97 6.36
NVIDIA (NVDA) demonstrates significantly superior profitability compared to AMD. NVDA boasts a net profit margin of 63.66%, a return on equity of 117.21%, and a return on assets of 53.57%. These figures dwarf AMD's metrics, which show a net profit margin of 15.58%, a return on equity of 10.2%, and a return on assets of 5.13%. NVDA's exceptional margins indicate highly efficient operations and strong pricing power within its market. The stark difference in profitability confirms NVDA's dominant position and its ability to convert revenue into substantial profits. While AMD is growing its revenue, its profit generation and capital efficiency are considerably less impressive than NVDA's, making NVDA the clear winner in terms of profitability.

Earnings Reality Check i

NVDA

Last 5 Qs: NVDA beat estimates 5x out of 5. Fell 4x after beats. (Sell the news?)

AMD

Last 5 Qs: AMD beat estimates 5x out of 5. Rose 3x after beats.

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: NVDA vs AMD
Indicator NVDA AMD
RSI (14) 63.50 80.39
50-Day MA $215.98 $504.71
200-Day MA $199.47 $364.75
AMD exhibits stronger current momentum with an RSI of 80.39 and a Stochastic reading of 94.72, indicating it is in overbought territory and showing significant upward price pressure. Its MACD of 36.48 also suggests strong bullish momentum. NVDA, on the other hand, has a more moderate RSI (63.50) and a Stochastic of 65.13, suggesting it is in a less extended, more balanced technical state. NVDA's MACD is 2.28, indicating positive but less aggressive momentum compared to AMD. Both stocks are trading well above their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, confirming established uptrends. AMD's price is currently at its 52-week high, while NVDA is trading below its 52-week high but still shows a healthy upward trend. AMD's technicals suggest a potential short-term overbought condition, whereas NVDA's are more neutral, offering a potentially better risk-reward profile for entry.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

NVDA

Buy
Technical Score: 78/100

AMD

Sell
Technical Score: 21/100

Why the ratings differ: AMD currently scores poorly on technical momentum (price sitting below key moving averages), while the analyst view below reflects forward-looking estimates of the business. A stock can be technically weak and still carry bullish analyst targets: the two measure different things over different horizons.

NVDA garners stronger analyst support with a 'Strong Buy' consensus from 11 analysts and a total of 60 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 62 analysts. The median analyst target price of $315 suggests significant upside potential from its current price. AMD also receives a predominantly positive analyst rating, with 5 'Strong Buy' and 39 'Buy' ratings from 55 analysts, but its median target price of $616 is slightly below its current trading price, indicating less immediate upside according to analyst consensus. The analyst community clearly favors NVDA, reflected in both the quantity and quality of buy ratings and the significant premium of its target price over the current stock price. While AMD is well-regarded, the analyst sentiment and price targets suggest less conviction for near-term appreciation compared to NVDA.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: NVDA vs AMD
Metric NVDA AMD
Beta (Volatility) i 2.22 2.48
Sharpe Ratio 0.75 1.27
For NVIDIA (NVDA), a primary risk is the intense competition in the AI chip market, where AMD and other players are actively developing competing products. A slowdown in AI infrastructure spending or a significant technological advancement by a competitor could impact NVDA's growth trajectory. Additionally, its high valuation, while justified by current growth, makes it susceptible to sharp corrections if growth expectations are not met. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) faces risks related to its ability to consistently gain market share against established giants like Intel and NVIDIA. Execution risks in bringing new products to market and achieving the projected performance targets are significant. Also, AMD's lower profitability and higher P/E ratio relative to its current earnings power present a risk if its ambitious growth plans falter. The company's reliance on specific product cycles also introduces cyclicality risk.

Comparative ProTips

  • Consider NVDA for its superior profitability and market leadership in AI hardware, offering a more stable growth profile.
  • Monitor AMD's ability to consistently execute on product roadmaps and gain market share against intense competition.
  • For investors seeking immediate upside based on technicals, AMD presents a strong, albeit potentially overbought, momentum act. NVDA offers a more balanced risk-reward based on fundamentals.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
NVDA
Current: $225.07
ENTRY ZONES
$213.82
$225.07
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$207.40
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$224.51
+10%
$235.20
+15%
$245.89
AMD
Current: $630.63
ENTRY ZONES
$599.10
$630.63
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$581.13
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$629.05
+10%
$659.01
+15%
$688.96
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (AMD). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices.

Note: The AI favored NVDA based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, NVDA or AMD?+
NVDA is the preferred buy due to its superior profitability, higher revenue growth, and more attractive valuation metrics compared to AMD. NVDA's net profit margin is over 63%, significantly outpacing AMD's 15.58%.
What are the key risks for NVDA vs AMD?+
NVDA's main risks include intense competition and potential slowdowns in AI spending, while AMD faces execution risks in gaining market share and achieving performance targets against competitors.
How do NVDA and AMD compare on profitability?+
NVDA is significantly more profitable, with a net profit margin of 63.66% and ROE of 117.21%, compared to AMD's 15.58% net profit margin and 10.2% ROE.
Which stock has better technical momentum?+
AMD currently shows stronger technical momentum with an RSI of 80.39 and Stochastic of 94.72, indicating it is in overbought territory, while NVDA's RSI is 43.72.
What do analysts say about NVDA and AMD?+
Analysts overwhelmingly favor NVDA, with a median target price of $315 suggesting significant upside, whereas AMD's median target of $616 is slightly below its current price.
How do their valuations compare?+
NVDA has a much lower P/E ratio of 28.45 compared to AMD's 161.35, making NVDA appear more attractively valued on an earnings basis, despite its higher revenue growth.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of NVDA vs AMD is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on September 27, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.