Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
The Goldman Sachs Group vs Morgan Stanley
VS
Comparative Analysis
Goldman Sachs (GS) wins this head-to-head comparison against Morgan Stanley (MS), primarily driven by its superior profitability and stronger recent earnings performance. While both firms operate in the competitive financial services sector, GS demonstrates a more efficient business model and better capital utilization. MS shows some positive signs, but GS's current financial health and operational efficiency give it the edge for investors seeking a more stable and profitable financial institution. GS is currently trading at $935.45, below its 52-week high of $1153.99 and above its low of $740.01. MS is trading at $196.31, below its 52-week high of $232.25 and above its low of $151.84. GS's current price is below its 20-day EMA of $977.42 and 50-day SMA of $1020.71, indicating a bearish short-term trend, while its RSI of 25.21 suggests oversold conditions. MS is also trading below its 20-day EMA of $205.98 and 50-day SMA of $211.91, with an RSI of 18.63, also indicating oversold conditions and a bearish short-term trend.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) is GS's demonstrably superior net profit margin and more efficient asset utilization, as evidenced by its higher ROA. While both firms are major players in financial services and face similar market risks, GS's ability to convert revenue into profit and manage its balance sheet more effectively gives it a distinct advantage in terms of operational performance and underlying profitability.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) is cautiously optimistic, contingent on broader market conditions and interest rate trajectories. For GS, continued strength in its investment banking and trading divisions, coupled with effective cost management, could drive earnings growth. A potential scenario involves GS’s price recovering towards its 52-week high if market sentiment improves and its profitability trends continue. MS faces a similar outlook, with its performance tied to the health of capital markets and its ability to navigate economic uncertainty. A positive scenario for MS would involve a rebound in deal-making activity and a stabilization of its wealth management business. However, both stocks are currently in bearish technical trends, suggesting that significant upside may be limited in the short term without a broader market catalyst or company-specific positive news.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 14.25 | 15.86 |
| Market Cap | 272.38B | 308.32B |
| Price/Sales | 3.98 | 3.96 |
| Price/Book | 2.55 | 2.90 |
| EV/EBITDA | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend Yield | 1.92% | 2.11% |
Goldman Sachs (GS) trades at a P/E ratio of 14.25, which is slightly more attractive than Morgan Stanley's (MS) P/E of 15.86. This suggests that investors are currently willing to pay less for each dollar of GS's earnings compared to MS. Both companies have market capitalizations in the hundreds of billions, with MS at approximately $308 billion and GS at approximately $272 billion. While GS's P/E is lower, MS's larger market cap might indicate a broader investor base or perceived stability. GS's price is currently trading below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a bearish trend. Its RSI of 25.21 suggests it is in oversold territory. MS is also trading below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with an RSI of 18.63, also indicating oversold conditions. Both stocks are exhibiting weak short-term technicals, but GS's slightly lower P/E ratio offers a marginal valuation advantage.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 42.50% | 28.00% |
| Profit Margin | 31.04% | 25.90% |
| Return on Equity | 16.90% | 17.97% |
| Return on Assets | 1.07% | 1.35% |
| Debt/Equity | 725.38 | 517.28 |
Goldman Sachs (GS) exhibits superior profitability metrics compared to Morgan Stanley (MS). GS boasts a net profit margin of 31.04%, significantly higher than MS's 25.9%. Also, GS demonstrates a stronger return on equity (ROE) at 16.9% versus MS's 17.97%, and a more efficient return on assets (ROA) at 1.07% compared to MS's 1.35%. While MS's ROE is slightly higher, GS's higher net profit margin and ROA indicate a more efficient and profitable business operation overall. These profitability figures suggest that GS is more effective at converting revenue into profit and utilizing its assets to generate returns. The higher net profit margin for GS is particularly noteworthy, pointing to better cost control or pricing power within its business segments. Investors prioritizing operational efficiency and profit generation would find GS's profile more compelling.
Earnings Reality Check
GS
Last 3 Qs: GS beat estimates 3x out of 3. Rose 3x after beats.
MS
Last 5 Qs: MS beat estimates 4x out of 5. Fell 4x after beats. (Sell the news?)
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 25.21 | 18.63 |
| 50-Day MA | $1,020.71 | $211.91 |
| 200-Day MA | $959.32 | $193.59 |
Both Goldman Sachs (GS) and Morgan Stanley (MS) are currently exhibiting bearish technical signals, trading below key moving averages and showing oversold conditions on their respective RSI indicators. GS's RSI stands at 25.21, with its 20-day EMA at $977.42 and 50-day SMA at $1020.71. MS's RSI is even lower at 18.63, with its 20-day EMA at $205.98 and 50-day SMA at $211.91. Both MACD lines are negative, indicating downward momentum. GS's 52-week range is $740.01 to $1153.99, and its current price of $935.45 places it roughly 37% above its low. MS's 52-week range is $151.84 to $232.25, and its current price of $196.31 places it approximately 29% above its low. While both are in downtrends, GS is technically closer to its 52-week high relative to its range than MS, despite both showing oversold conditions. The oversold readings suggest potential for a short-term bounce in both, but the underlying trend remains negative.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
GS
Technical Score: 55/100
MS
Technical Score: 59/100
Analyst sentiment for Goldman Sachs (GS) is mixed to positive, with 1 Strong Buy, 6 Buys, 16 Holds, 1 Sell, and 1 Strong Sell among 25 analysts, and a median target price of $1150. This median target suggests a potential upside of approximately 23% from its current price of $935.45. The significant number of Hold ratings indicates caution among analysts despite the positive target. Morgan Stanley (MS) garners slightly more bullish sentiment from analysts, with 2 Strong Buys, 9 Buys, 13 Holds, and 1 Sell from 25 analysts, and a median target price of $243. This target implies a potential upside of approximately 24% from its current price of $196.31. While MS has a slightly more positive rating distribution and a similar implied upside, GS's higher median target relative to its current price and its stronger profitability metrics make its overall sentiment more compelling for a winner.
Note: While MS shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Hold 59/100), the AI comparative analysis favors GS (Hold 55/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 1.28 | 1.21 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.95 | 0.95 |
For Goldman Sachs (GS), key risks include a potential slowdown in investment banking and trading revenues, which are cyclical and sensitive to market volatility. Increased regulatory scrutiny within the financial sector could also impact profitability and operational flexibility. Also, a sustained downturn in the broader equity markets could negatively affect its asset management and wealth management businesses. Morgan Stanley (MS) faces similar risks related to market volatility impacting its trading and investment banking divisions. A significant economic recession could lead to higher loan defaults and reduced demand for its financial advisory services. Additionally, competition within the financial services industry remains intense, and MS must continually innovate and manage costs to maintain its market position and profitability.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider GS for its superior profitability and consistent earnings beats, offering a more efficient operational profile.
- Monitor the oversold technical conditions for both GS and MS; a short-term bounce is possible, but the underlying trend remains bearish.
- Evaluate the market's reaction to MS's earnings beats more closely; the negative price action despite positive surprises warrants further investigation into underlying concerns.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
GS
Current: $935.45
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$888.68
Aggressive
$935.45
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$862.02
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$933.11
+10%
$977.55
+15%
$1,021.98
MS
Current: $196.31
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$186.49
Aggressive
$196.31
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$180.90
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$195.82
+10%
$205.14
+15%
$214.47
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored GS based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While MS currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (59 vs 55), the AI favors GS on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, GS or MS?+
GS is the preferred buy due to its superior profitability metrics, including a higher net profit margin and ROA, despite both stocks showing bearish technicals. GS's consistent earnings beats also provide a more reliable performance record.
What are the key risks for GS vs MS?+
Both GS and MS face risks from market volatility impacting trading and investment banking. GS's specific risks include regulatory scrutiny, while MS faces potential impacts from economic downturns on its advisory services.
How do GS and MS compare on valuation?+
GS trades at a slightly more attractive P/E ratio of 14.25 compared to MS's 15.86, suggesting a better valuation for GS based on current earnings.
Which stock offers better earnings growth potential?+
Both have shown positive earnings surprises recently, but GS has a more consistent track record of exceeding estimates, while MS has seen negative price reactions despite beats.
How do their profitability margins compare?+
GS leads significantly in profitability with a net profit margin of 31.04% versus MS's 25.9%, indicating better efficiency in converting revenue to profit.
What do analysts recommend for GS and MS?+
Analysts show slightly more bullish ratings for MS, but GS has a higher median target price relative to its current price, suggesting strong upside potential.
What is the dividend yield for GS and MS?+
GS offers a dividend yield of approximately 1.92%, while MS offers a slightly higher yield of approximately 2.11%.