TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

Vanguard Information Technology ETF vs Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF

ETF·NYSE

Vanguard Information Technology ETF VGT

$118.81 ▼ 2.89%
Hold
55 / 100 AI score
Full VGT analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF FTEC

$283.62 ▼ 2.87%
Buy
71 / 100 AI score
Full FTEC analysis →
01

The short version

How VGT and FTEC compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

VGT and FTEC on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours FTEC
VGT FTEC
55/100 AI score 71/100
+28.7% 1-year change +26.7%
19.8% Volatility (30d, yearly) 21.9%
38.7 RSI (14-day) 34.2
The verdict
FTEC wins this head-to-head comparison against VGT, primarily driven by stronger recent momentum and a slightly lower expense ratio. While both ETFs track the technology sector, FTEC has demonstrated superior performance in the short-term and offers a marginally better cost structure for investors. VGT, despite its longer history and larger asset base, is currently showing weaker technical indicators and a less favorable position relative to its moving averages. Investors seeking exposure to technology should favor FTEC for its current performance edge and cost efficiency. Both ETFs offer broad diversification within the technology sector, but FTEC's current price action and technical setup suggest a more favorable risk-reward profile at this moment. VGT's recent underperformance, particularly its position below key moving averages, indicates potential headwinds that FTEC appears to be navigating more effectively. The decision hinges on prioritizing current momentum and cost savings, which FTEC delivers more convincingly.
Key difference
The key differentiator between FTEC and VGT lies in their recent performance and cost efficiency. FTEC demonstrates stronger trailing returns across multiple timeframes and possesses a marginally lower expense ratio, making it a more cost-effective choice for investors. While both ETFs are technically showing signs of short-term weakness, FTEC's momentum indicators, particularly its MACD and stochastic readings, suggest a greater potential for a near-term rebound compared to VGT. This combination of superior historical performance and lower fees gives FTEC a distinct advantage.
Outlook
The outlook for both FTEC and VGT remains cautiously optimistic, underpinned by the long-term growth trajectory of the technology sector. However, current technical indicators suggest a period of consolidation or potential further downside in the short term. FTEC's stronger momentum and lower costs position it favorably for a rebound once market sentiment improves. VGT, while a historically strong performer, faces headwinds from its current technical weakness and slightly higher expense ratio. In a bullish scenario, a recovery in tech stocks driven by strong earnings and favorable macroeconomic conditions could see both ETFs rally significantly, with FTEC potentially outperforming due to its momentum edge. In a bearish scenario, rising interest rates or a broader economic slowdown could lead to further declines, with both ETFs experiencing pullbacks, though FTEC's lower cost might offer some resilience.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
VGT FTEC

Over 1 year: VGT gained 28.6% and FTEC gained 26.5%, a gap of 2.1 points in VGT's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

How big each is, where each trades in its year, and its trend.

VGT FTEC
$177.9B Size (net assets / market cap) $22.1B
$206,889 24h volume $727,419
75% Position in 52-week range 75%
-3.1% Price against 50-day average -3.0%
Reading
While neither VGT nor FTEC are valued on traditional metrics like P/E ratios due to their ETF structure, their performance relative to their 52-week ranges and moving averages provides a proxy for valuation and trend. FTEC is currently trading at $283.62, closer to its 52-week high of $311.83 than its low of $198.17. VGT, trading at $118.81, is also closer to its 52-week high of $130.66 than its low of $83.10. However, FTEC's price is currently below its 20-day EMA ($297.56), while VGT is also below its 20-day EMA ($124.88). Both ETFs are showing signs of technical weakness, but FTEC's proximity to its highs suggests a stronger underlying trend despite the short-term pullback.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

VGT FTEC
55/100 AI score 71/100
38.7 RSI (14-day) 34.2
-3.1% Price against 50-day average -3.0%
+9.9% Price against 200-day average +9.9%
Technicals
FTEC exhibits stronger short-term momentum despite recent weakness, as indicated by its higher MACD value of 0.71 compared to VGT's 0.47. Both ETFs are currently trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages, signaling a potential short-term downtrend. FTEC's RSI is at 34.23, suggesting it is approaching oversold territory, while VGT's RSI is at 38.74, also indicating soft momentum. FTEC's stochastic oscillator is at a very low 3.79, suggesting a potential for a bounce, whereas VGT's stochastic at 12.51 is also low but less indicative of an immediate reversal. Both ETFs are well above their 200-day simple moving averages, confirming a longer-term uptrend remains intact.
Sentiment
Sentiment for both VGT and FTEC is neutral to slightly negative in the short term, as reflected by their technical indicators. With analyst ratings and median targets unavailable for both ETFs, sentiment must be inferred from price action and technicals. The current price weakness and RSI readings below 40 suggest caution among market participants. However, the fact that both ETFs remain significantly above their 200-day moving averages indicates that the broader market sentiment towards technology remains positive over the longer term. The slight edge in momentum indicators for FTEC suggests a marginally more positive short-term sentiment.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

VGT FTEC
19.8% Volatility (30d, yearly) 21.9%
1.01 Sharpe ratio 0.98
Risk
The primary risk for both VGT and FTEC stems from sector-specific concentration in technology. A downturn in the tech sector, driven by regulatory changes, slowing innovation, or macroeconomic factors impacting growth stocks, would disproportionately affect these ETFs. FTEC's risk is slightly elevated due to its current position below its short-term moving averages and its lower stochastic reading, which, while potentially signaling a bounce, could also indicate a deepening downtrend if market conditions worsen. VGT faces similar sector risks, compounded by its current technical weakness and a less favorable trailing return profile compared to FTEC over multiple periods.
ProTips
  1. Prioritize FTEC for its superior historical performance and lower expense ratio, offering better value for technology sector exposure.
  2. Monitor the 20-day EMA for both ETFs; a sustained move above this level would signal a potential resumption of the uptrend.
  3. Given the sector concentration, consider diversifying with non-technology assets to mitigate sector-specific risks.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

Thousands of paths from each price history: the median and the 90th percentile for each.

202620282030203220342036
VGT median VGT 90th FTEC median FTEC 90th
VGT FTEC
$10,052 Downside, 2036 (10th) $10,423
$27,723 Base case, 2036 (median) $25,188
$76,464 Upside, 2036 (90th) $60,866

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in VGT grows to about $27,700 and $10,000 in FTEC to about $25,200 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VGT
Current: $118.81
ENTRY ZONES
$112.87
$118.81
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$109.48
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$124.75
+10% from current
$130.69
+15% from current
$136.63
FTEC
Current: $283.62
ENTRY ZONES
$269.44
$283.62
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$261.36
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$297.80
+10% from current
$311.98
+15% from current
$326.16
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored FTEC based on price momentum. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do FTEC and VGT compare in terms of costs?+
FTEC has a lower expense ratio of 0.084% compared to VGT's 0.09%, making FTEC the more cost-efficient option for investors over the long term.
Which ETF has shown better historical performance?+
FTEC has demonstrated superior trailing returns compared to VGT over the year-to-date, 1-year, and 3-year periods, indicating stronger historical performance.
What is the sector exposure for FTEC and VGT?+
Both FTEC and VGT offer highly concentrated exposure to the Technology sector, with Technology comprising over 99% of their respective holdings.
Are there any significant differences in their technical setups?+
Currently, FTEC shows slightly stronger momentum indicators (higher MACD, lower stochastic suggesting potential bounce) compared to VGT, despite both being below their 20-day EMAs.
Which is more volatile, VGT or FTEC?+
They have been about equally volatile. Over the 30 days to October 17, 2026, VGT's annualized volatility was 19.8% and FTEC's 21.9%, measured from daily closing prices.
Do VGT and FTEC move together?+
Yes, closely: over roughly the past year to October 17, 2026, the correlation of their daily returns was +1.00 (+1 means they move in lockstep, 0 means no relationship). Holding both adds little diversification.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of VGT vs FTEC is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 17, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.