Jump to any asset
850 assets, updated daily
Enphase Energy vs First Solar
VS
Comparative Analysis
FSLR wins this head-to-head comparison against ENPH, primarily driven by its superior valuation and profitability metrics. While both companies operate in the solar energy sector, FSLR presents a more compelling investment case due to its significantly lower P/E ratio and higher net profit margin. ENPH, despite a recent revenue decline, shows a more consistent analyst sentiment towards 'Buy' ratings. However, FSLR's ability to consistently beat earnings estimates and its stronger profitability metrics give it the edge. FSLR's current price of $207.17 is trading below its 50-day ($217.37) and 200-day ($229.97) moving averages, indicating a bearish technical trend. ENPH's price of $37.43 is also below its 50-day ($39.52) and 200-day ($40.95) moving averages. Despite both showing technical weakness, FSLR's valuation and profitability make it the preferred choice.
Key Differentiator
FSLR's key differentiator is its significantly more attractive valuation and superior profitability. With a P/E ratio of 12.5 compared to ENPH's 36.5, FSLR offers investors more earnings power for their money. This, combined with a net profit margin over three times that of ENPH, makes FSLR a more financially sound investment despite recent revenue headwinds for both companies.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both ENPH and FSLR is mixed, with current technicals suggesting further downside. FSLR, trading at $207.17, faces resistance from its 50-day SMA at $217.37 and its 200-day SMA at $229.97. A break below its 52-week low of $182.99 could signal a deeper correction. However, its strong earnings history and profitability provide a floor. ENPH, at $37.43, faces similar resistance from its SMAs ($39.52 and $40.95). A move towards its 52-week low of $25.78 is possible if revenue does not rebound. The overall solar sector sentiment and macroeconomic conditions, particularly interest rates, will heavily influence the performance of both companies over the next 6-12 months.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ENPH | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 36.50 | 12.51 |
| Market Cap | 4.87B | 22.26B |
| Price/Sales | 3.67 | 4.06 |
| Price/Book | 4.12 | 2.11 |
| EV/EBITDA | 23.61 | 8.96 |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
FSLR offers a significantly more attractive valuation than ENPH, trading at a P/E of 12.5 compared to ENPH's P/E of 36.5. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of FSLR's earnings. ENPH's higher P/E ratio, despite a recent revenue contraction of 19.6%, indicates a potential overvaluation relative to its current earnings power. FSLR's revenue has also seen a slight decline of 3.7%, but its earnings multiple remains considerably lower. ENPH's market capitalization stands at $4.87 billion, while FSLR boasts a much larger market capitalization of $22.26 billion. This larger scale for FSLR may contribute to its more favorable valuation metrics. Both companies pay no dividends, making their investment appeal centered on capital appreciation rather than income generation.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ENPH | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | -19.60% | -3.70% |
| Profit Margin | 10.09% | 32.47% |
| Return on Equity | 13.00% | 18.51% |
| Return on Assets | 2.38% | 8.62% |
| Debt/Equity | 51.90 | 1.88 |
This indicates that FSLR is highly efficient at converting revenue into profit and effectively utilizing its assets. ENPH's net profit margin is 10.09%, and its return on assets is 2.38%, which are considerably lower. Furthermore, FSLR's return on equity stands at 18.51%, suggesting strong returns for its shareholders. ENPH's return on equity is 13%. These figures highlight FSLR's greater operational efficiency and stronger financial health.
Earnings Reality Check
ENPH
Earnings data unavailable. No recent report data found.
FSLR
Last 3 Qs: FSLR beat estimates 3x out of 3. Rose 2x after beats.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | ENPH | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.58 | 43.95 |
| 50-Day MA | $39.52 | $217.37 |
| 200-Day MA | $40.95 | $229.97 |
Both ENPH and FSLR are currently exhibiting bearish technical signals, trading below their key moving averages. ENPH's price of $37.43 is below its 50-day SMA of $39.52 and its 200-day SMA of $40.95. Its RSI is at 45.58, indicating a lack of strong momentum, and its MACD is negative at -0.93. Similarly, FSLR's price of $207.17 is below its 50-day SMA of $217.37 and its 200-day SMA of $229.97. Its RSI is 43.95, also suggesting weak momentum, and its MACD is negative at -4.88. Both stocks show signs of being in downtrends, with FSLR showing slightly weaker momentum indicators.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
ENPH
Technical Score: 59/100
FSLR
Technical Score: 58/100
Analyst sentiment leans positive for both ENPH and FSLR, but FSLR garners a higher proportion of 'Strong Buy' and 'Buy' ratings. FSLR has 26 'Strong Buy' or 'Buy' ratings out of 36 analysts, with a median target price of $270, suggesting significant upside potential from its current price of $207.17. ENPH has 12 'Strong Buy' or 'Buy' ratings out of 30 analysts, with a median target price of $47, indicating less upside potential from its current price of $37.43. While ENPH has a higher number of 'Hold' ratings, the overall analyst consensus for FSLR suggests greater conviction in its future performance.
Note: While ENPH shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Hold 59/100), the AI comparative analysis favors FSLR (Hold 58/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | ENPH | FSLR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 1.64 | 1.73 |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.26 | 0.18 |
A primary risk for ENPH is its recent negative revenue growth of -19.6% and its significantly higher P/E ratio, which could lead to a sharp correction if earnings do not improve. The large number of 'Hold' ratings from analysts also suggests caution among the analyst community regarding its future prospects. Its technicals are also weak, trading below key moving averages. For FSLR, the main risks include its negative revenue growth of -3.7% and its current technical downtrend, trading below its 50-day and 200-day SMAs. While its valuation and profitability are strong, a continued slowdown in revenue or a broader market downturn could pressure its stock price. However, its strong earnings beat history and higher analyst conviction provide some buffer against these risks.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider FSLR for its strong profitability and attractive valuation, despite current technical weakness.
- Monitor ENPH's revenue trends and analyst sentiment closely; a turnaround in revenue is needed to justify its current valuation.
- Both stocks are in downtrends, suggesting potential for further downside in the short term. Wait for technical confirmation before initiating new positions.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
ENPH
Current: $37.43
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$35.56
Aggressive
$37.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$34.49
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$37.34
+10%
$39.11
+15%
$40.89
FSLR
Current: $207.17
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$196.81
Aggressive
$207.17
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$190.91
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$206.65
+10%
$216.49
+15%
$226.33
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (ENPH). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices. Note: The AI favored FSLR based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While ENPH currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (59 vs 58), the AI favors FSLR on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which stock is a better buy, ENPH or FSLR?+
FSLR is the preferred buy due to its significantly lower valuation (P/E 12.5 vs 36.5) and superior profitability (Net Margin 32.47% vs 10.09%). While both have negative revenue growth and bearish technicals, FSLR's earnings consistency and analyst conviction provide a stronger foundation.
What are the key risks for ENPH and FSLR?+
ENPH faces risks from its negative revenue growth and high P/E, coupled with a high number of analyst 'Hold' ratings. FSLR's risks include its own negative revenue growth and current technical downtrend, though its strong earnings history and profitability mitigate these concerns.
How do ENPH and FSLR compare on profitability?+
FSLR is considerably more profitable, with a net profit margin of 32.47% and a return on equity of 18.51%, compared to ENPH's net profit margin of 10.09% and return on equity of 13%.
What is the valuation difference between ENPH and FSLR?+
FSLR is valued much more cheaply, trading at a P/E ratio of 12.5, while ENPH trades at a P/E of 36.5, indicating FSLR is a more attractive value proposition.
How consistent are the earnings for ENPH and FSLR?+
FSLR has a strong history of beating earnings estimates, as evidenced by its recent quarterly results.
What do analysts think about ENPH and FSLR?+
Analysts are more bullish on FSLR, with a higher concentration of 'Strong Buy' and 'Buy' ratings and a higher median target price ($270) compared to ENPH ($47).
What are the technical outlooks for ENPH and FSLR?+
Both stocks are currently in technical downtrends, trading below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages, with weak RSI and negative MACD indicators.