TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 849 assets, updated daily

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF vs Fidelity High Dividend ETF

SCHD

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF NYSE

$33.04 ▼ 0.33%
VS

FDVV

Fidelity High Dividend ETF NYSE

$61.67 ▲ 0.21%
Last updated: • SCHD at $33.04, FDVV at $61.67
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

SCHD wins this head-to-head comparison against FDVV, primarily driven by its superior income generation capabilities and more favorable expense ratio. While both ETFs target large-cap value equities, SCHD offers a higher dividend yield and a lower cost of ownership, making it the more attractive option for income-focused investors. FDVV shows stronger performance in certain shorter-term trailing returns, but SCHD's long-term consistency and income advantage are more compelling for the target investor profile. SCHD's higher dividend yield of 3.20% compared to FDVV's 2.76% is a significant differentiator for income-seeking portfolios. Coupled with a substantially lower expense ratio of 0.06% versus FDVV's 0.15%, SCHD provides greater net returns to investors over time. Although FDVV has outperformed SCHD in the 3-year trailing returns, SCHD's longer-term performance, particularly over 10 years, and its consistent income stream solidify its position as the preferred choice.

Key Differentiator

The most significant differentiator between SCHD and FDVV is their income generation potential and cost efficiency. SCHD offers a higher dividend yield of 3.20% and a substantially lower expense ratio of 0.06%, making it a more attractive and cost-effective choice for investors prioritizing income. This combination of higher yield and lower fees directly translates to better net returns for income-focused portfolios over the long term.

Joint Outlook

The outlook for SCHD is positive for income-oriented investors, supported by its consistent dividend payouts and lower fees. While current technicals are weak, its strong long-term performance and focus on dividend-paying companies suggest resilience. FDVV's outlook is more dependent on the performance of the technology sector; a strong tech rally could boost its returns, but a downturn poses a significant risk. For the next 6-12 months, SCHD is expected to continue providing a reliable income stream, potentially outperforming FDVV if market conditions favor value and income over growth. FDVV may see periods of outperformance if technology stocks lead the market, but its higher expense ratio and lower yield present a structural disadvantage for long-term total return compared to SCHD.

Price Analysis Comparison

Asset Metrics i

Asset Metrics: SCHD vs FDVV
Metric SCHD FDVV
52 Week Range $26.32 - $35.31 $53.77 - $64.54
Prev. Close $33.15 $61.54
24h Volume 17.79M 505.40K
SCHD, with a current price of $33.04, is trading closer to its 52-week low of $26.32 than FDVV is to its low of $53.77, with FDVV trading at $61.67. SCHD's price is below its 50-day ($33.98) and 20-day ($33.24) moving averages, indicating some short-term weakness. Conversely, FDVV's price is just below its 20-day EMA ($61.67) but above its 52-week low, suggesting a more stable, albeit not strongly trending, position. SCHD's RSI of 36.82 suggests it is approaching oversold territory, while FDVV's RSI of 40.44 indicates a more neutral momentum. SCHD's 52-week range position suggests more potential upside if a recovery occurs, whereas FDVV is trading closer to its recent highs. However, the current technical readings for SCHD, including a CCI of 16.81, point to a lack of immediate buying pressure. FDVV's CCI of 54.22 indicates a more positive short-term sentiment. The valuation comparison leans slightly towards SCHD due to its proximity to its 52-week low, implying a potentially more attractive entry point for value investors, despite current weak momentum.

Market Performance i

Market Performance: SCHD vs FDVV
Metric SCHD FDVV
Volatility (30D) 12.43% 13.32%
24h Range $32.96 - $33.11 $61.38 - $61.76
Market Strength (RSI) 36.8 63.5
Trend (SMA 50) Bearish Bearish
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~13%). Market momentum is currently Bearish for both.

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: SCHD vs FDVV
Indicator SCHD FDVV
RSI (14) 36.82 63.50
50-Day MA $33.98 $62.69
200-Day MA $31.85 $59.88
SCHD is currently exhibiting weaker technical momentum, trading below its 20-day ($33.24) and 50-day ($33.98) moving averages, with an RSI (63.50) and a CCI of 16.81. This suggests a bearish short-term trend and a lack of immediate buying interest. The MACD at -0.35 also indicates bearish momentum, though it is relatively close to the signal line. FDVV shows slightly more constructive, though still subdued, technicals. It is trading just below its 20-day EMA ($61.67) but above its 50-day SMA ($62.69), with an RSI (63.50) and a CCI of 54.22. The MACD for FDVV is -0.38, also indicating bearish momentum, but its stochastic reading of 57.77 is in the mid-range, suggesting less immediate pressure than SCHD's stochastic of 45.64. Overall, neither ETF is showing strong bullish technical signals, but FDVV is less bearish in its current price action.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

SCHD

Hold
Technical Score: 55/100

FDVV

Hold
Technical Score: 55/100
As both SCHD and FDVV are ETFs and do not have analyst ratings or price targets, sentiment must be inferred from their price action and fund characteristics. SCHD's higher dividend yield (3.20%) and lower expense ratio (0.06%) suggest a positive sentiment among income-focused investors who prioritize consistent income and cost efficiency. Its strong long-term trailing returns, especially over 10 years (13.17%), also indicate sustained investor confidence. FDVV's sentiment is more mixed. While it has a higher allocation to technology, which can attract growth-oriented investors, its lower dividend yield (2.76%) and higher expense ratio (0.15%) may temper enthusiasm for income investors. Its recent performance, particularly the 3-year trailing return (19.27%), might attract some attention, but the overall sentiment appears less strong than for SCHD, especially considering the current technical weakness across both.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: SCHD vs FDVV
Metric SCHD FDVV
Sharpe Ratio 0.38 0.58
The primary risk for SCHD lies in its current technical weakness, with its price trading below key moving averages and showing low momentum indicators like RSI and CCI. A sustained downturn in its underlying dividend-paying stocks could also impact its income generation and price appreciation. Also, if interest rates rise significantly, the appeal of dividend stocks might diminish relative to fixed-income alternatives, potentially pressuring SCHD's price. FDVV faces risks related to its higher concentration in technology stocks, which can be more volatile and sensitive to economic downturns or regulatory changes. Its higher expense ratio of 0.15% also represents a drag on returns compared to SCHD. While its 3-year returns are strong, its 1-year return lags behind SCHD, indicating potential underperformance in certain market conditions. A sharp correction in the technology sector could disproportionately impact FDVV.

Comparative ProTips

  • Prioritize SCHD for income-focused portfolios due to its higher yield and lower expense ratio.
  • Consider FDVV if seeking slightly more exposure to technology growth, but be mindful of its higher costs and potential volatility.
  • Monitor the interest rate environment, as rising rates could impact the relative attractiveness of dividend-focused ETFs like SCHD.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
SCHD
Current: $33.04
ENTRY ZONES
$31.39
$33.04
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$30.45
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$32.96
+10%
$34.53
+15%
$36.10
FDVV
Current: $61.67
ENTRY ZONES
$58.59
$61.67
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$56.83
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$61.52
+10%
$64.45
+15%
$67.37
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored SCHD based on income/dividend profile. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is a better buy, SCHD or FDVV?+
SCHD is the better buy due to its higher dividend yield (3.20% vs 2.76%) and significantly lower expense ratio (0.06% vs 0.15%), offering superior income generation and cost efficiency for investors.
What are the key risks for SCHD vs FDVV?+
SCHD's main risks include current technical weakness and potential underperformance if interest rates rise, while FDVV's risks stem from its technology sector concentration and higher expense ratio.
How do SCHD and FDVV compare on dividend yield?+
SCHD offers a higher dividend yield of 3.20%, compared to FDVV's yield of 2.76%, making SCHD more attractive for income-focused investors.
Which ETF has lower fees?+
SCHD has a lower expense ratio of 0.06%, while FDVV has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning SCHD is more cost-efficient for investors.
How does their long-term performance compare?+
SCHD has demonstrated stronger long-term performance, with a 10-year trailing return of 13.17%, compared to FDVV's 5-year return of 13.92% (10-year data not available for FDVV).
What is the sector exposure difference between SCHD and FDVV?+
SCHD has significant exposure to Healthcare (21.48%) and Energy (15.41%), while FDVV is heavily weighted towards Technology (29.78%) and Real Estate (9.68%).
How do their net assets compare?+
SCHD has significantly larger net assets of $107.89 billion compared to FDVV's $10.38 billion, indicating greater investor adoption and liquidity for SCHD.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of SCHD vs FDVV is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 11, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.