Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
CSX vs Norfolk Southern
VS
Comparative Analysis
CSX wins this head-to-head comparison against NSC, primarily driven by superior profitability and a more favorable valuation outlook. While both companies operate in the railroad sector and show positive revenue growth, CSX demonstrates stronger net profit margins and return on equity. CSX's current technical indicators also suggest a potential bottoming formation, offering a more compelling risk-reward profile at present. NSC, despite its larger market capitalization, exhibits weaker profitability metrics and is currently trading below key long-term moving averages, indicating a more challenging technical setup. Therefore, CSX presents a more attractive investment opportunity based on the available data.
Key Differentiator
CSX's superior profitability, particularly its higher net profit margin and return on equity, is the decisive factor separating it from NSC. Despite similar revenue growth and P/E ratios, CSX's ability to generate more profit from its operations and shareholder capital makes it the more fundamentally sound investment at this juncture. This operational efficiency provides a stronger foundation for future performance and resilience.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both CSX and NSC is cautiously optimistic, contingent on broader economic conditions and industrial demand. CSX's stronger profitability and positive analyst sentiment suggest it is better positioned to capitalize on any market recovery. A sustained economic expansion would likely drive increased freight volumes, benefiting CSX's top and bottom lines. NSC's outlook is more tempered by its weaker profitability and current technical weakness; it would require a significant market upswing and a reversal of its bearish technical trend to outperform.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CSX | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 27.12 | 26.47 |
| Market Cap | 86.66B | 70.30B |
| Price/Sales | 6.02 | 5.64 |
| Price/Book | 6.21 | 4.35 |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.44 | 15.33 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 1.73% |
CSX trades at a P/E ratio of 27.12, which is slightly higher than NSC's 26.47. However, CSX's higher P/E is justified by its superior profitability metrics. CSX's revenue growth of 10.1% is slightly lower than NSC's 11.4%, but its net profit margin of 22.21% significantly outpaces NSC's 21.02%. Also, CSX's return on equity at 24.36% is considerably stronger than NSC's 16.99%. The median analyst target for CSX is $54, suggesting a potential upside of approximately 15.4% from its current price, while NSC's median target of $369.5 implies a potential upside of about 17.4%. Despite NSC's slightly higher implied upside, CSX's stronger fundamental profitability makes its valuation more attractive.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | CSX | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 10.10% | 11.40% |
| Profit Margin | 22.21% | 21.02% |
| Return on Equity | 24.36% | 16.99% |
| Return on Assets | 7.38% | 5.95% |
| Debt/Equity | 138.07 | 105.52 |
CSX exhibits superior profitability compared to NSC. Its net profit margin stands at a strong 22.21%, notably higher than NSC's 21.02%. This indicates that CSX is more efficient at converting revenue into profit. Also, CSX demonstrates a significantly stronger return on equity (ROE) of 24.36%, compared to NSC's 16.99%. This suggests CSX is more effective at generating profits from shareholder investments. While both companies have positive returns on assets, CSX's higher ROE is a key differentiator in its operational efficiency and shareholder value generation.
Earnings Reality Check
CSX
Last 4 Qs: CSX beat estimates 2x out of 4. Rose 2x after beats.
NSC
Last 3 Qs: NSC beat estimates 3x out of 3. Fell 2x after beats. (Sell the news?)
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | CSX | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 29.36 | 24.77 |
| 50-Day MA | $49.83 | $333.71 |
| 200-Day MA | $44.05 | $310.98 |
CSX is currently trading at $46.78, well below its 50-day ($49.83) and 200-day ($44.05) moving averages, with an RSI of 29.36 indicating oversold conditions. The MACD is negative, suggesting bearish momentum, but the current price action near the lower end of its 52-week range may signal a potential reversal. NSC is trading at $313, below its 50-day ($333.71) and 200-day ($310.98) moving averages, with an RSI of 24.77 also in oversold territory. NSC's MACD is also negative and deeper than CSX's, indicating more pronounced bearish momentum. Both stocks are technically weak, but CSX's RSI is slightly higher and its price is closer to its 200-day SMA, suggesting a potentially nearer bottom.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
CSX
Technical Score: 55/100
NSC
Technical Score: 57/100
CSX garners a more positive analyst sentiment, with a 'Strong Buy' consensus from 4 analysts and a total of 17 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 25 analysts. The median analyst target price of $54 suggests considerable upside potential. NSC, on the other hand, has a more mixed sentiment, with only 5 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy' ratings out of 21 analysts, and a large number of 'Hold' ratings. Its median target price of $369.5 implies significant upside, but the higher proportion of 'Hold' ratings suggests less conviction from the analyst community compared to CSX.
Note: While NSC shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Hold 57/100), the AI comparative analysis favors CSX (Hold 55/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | CSX | NSC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 1.21 | 1.27 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.49 | 0.51 |
For CSX, the primary risks include a potential continuation of the current downtrend, as indicated by its technical indicators, and any slowdown in industrial activity that could impact rail volumes. Competition from other transportation modes and potential regulatory changes also pose risks. For NSC, risks include its weaker profitability margins and return on equity, which could make it more vulnerable in an economic downturn. Its current technical weakness, trading below key moving averages, suggests potential for further downside. Additionally, any disruptions to its extensive network or shifts in freight demand could negatively impact its performance.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider CSX for its superior operational efficiency and profitability, which provides a stronger fundamental basis for investment.
- Monitor the technicals for both CSX and NSC; a bounce from current oversold levels could present an entry opportunity, with CSX appearing closer to a potential bottom.
- Given the current market environment, focus on companies with strong earnings consistency and positive analyst sentiment, which favors CSX in this comparison.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
CSX
Current: $46.78
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$44.44
Aggressive
$46.78
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$43.11
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$46.66
+10%
$48.89
+15%
$51.11
NSC
Current: $313.00
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$297.35
Aggressive
$313.00
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$288.43
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$312.22
+10%
$327.09
+15%
$341.95
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored CSX based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While NSC currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (57 vs 55), the AI favors CSX on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, CSX or NSC?+
CSX is the preferred buy due to its superior profitability metrics (net profit margin and ROE) and more favorable analyst sentiment. While NSC has a slightly higher revenue growth rate, CSX's efficiency in converting revenue to profit and its stronger analyst backing make it more attractive.
What are the key risks for CSX vs NSC?+
CSX faces risks from potential continued technical weakness and economic slowdowns impacting rail volumes. NSC's main risks include its comparatively weaker profitability and current technical downtrend, making it more susceptible to market downturns.
How do CSX and NSC compare on valuation?+
CSX has a P/E of 27.12 and NSC has a P/E of 26.47. While NSC is slightly cheaper on a P/E basis, CSX's higher profitability metrics justify its valuation and present a better risk-reward profile.
What is the earnings outlook for CSX and NSC?+
Both companies have shown positive earnings surprises recently. CSX has a more consistent track record of beating estimates with positive price reactions, suggesting a more reliable earnings performance.
How do their profitability margins compare?+
CSX leads in profitability with a net profit margin of 22.21% and a return on equity of 24.36%, significantly outperforming NSC's 21.02% net profit margin and 16.99% ROE.
What do technical indicators suggest for CSX and NSC?+
Both stocks are technically weak and oversold. CSX's RSI is slightly higher, and its price is closer to its 200-day SMA, suggesting it may be nearer a potential bottom compared to NSC.
How does analyst sentiment differ between CSX and NSC?+
CSX enjoys stronger analyst support with more 'Buy' ratings and a higher median target price relative to its current price, indicating greater analyst conviction compared to NSC.