Jump to any asset 724 assets, updated daily
Wells Fargo & Company vs Citigroup
VS
Last updated: (1m ago) • WFC at $87.83, C at $136.63
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.
Comparative Analysis
Wells Fargo (WFC) emerges as the preferred investment over Citigroup (C) primarily due to its superior profitability metrics and a more balanced technical profile. WFC demonstrates a higher net profit margin and return on equity, indicating more efficient operations and better shareholder value generation. While C shows stronger revenue growth, WFC's current valuation and technical indicators suggest a more stable and potentially rewarding investment at this juncture. Investors seeking a blend of solid profitability and reasonable valuation should favor WFC.
Key Differentiator
The decisive factor favoring Wells Fargo (WFC) is its superior profitability. WFC consistently generates higher net profit margins and returns on equity and assets compared to Citigroup (C). This operational efficiency translates into a more robust financial profile, making WFC a more compelling choice for investors prioritizing consistent earnings generation and capital efficiency.
Joint Outlook
Looking ahead 6-12 months, both Wells Fargo (WFC) and Citigroup (C) are expected to navigate a complex banking environment. WFC's strong profitability should provide a resilient foundation, potentially allowing it to outperform if interest rate stability returns. C's higher revenue growth could lead to significant gains if it successfully improves its efficiency and margins. A scenario where WFC outperforms is likely if the market prioritizes stable earnings and dividends, while C could shine if growth acceleration and margin expansion materialize.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | WFC | C |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 12.69 | 14.59 |
| Market Cap | 264.66B | 226.82B |
| Price/Sales | 3.18 | 2.78 |
| Price/Book | 1.64 | 1.18 |
| EV/EBITDA | N/A | N/A |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
Wells Fargo (WFC) presents a more attractive valuation with a lower P/E ratio of 12.69 compared to Citigroup's (C) 14.59. This suggests that investors are paying less for each dollar of WFC's earnings. Both stocks trade within their 52-week ranges, with WFC at $87.83, closer to its 52-week high of $97.76 than its low of $72.78, while C at $136.625 is also nearer its high of $147.96 than its low of $90.68. WFC's current price is above its 50-day ($84.82) and 200-day ($84.91) moving averages, indicating a constructive technical setup, whereas C's price is just above its 50-day ($136.35) but significantly above its 200-day ($119.90) average.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | WFC | C |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 9.50% | 15.50% |
| Profit Margin | 27.23% | 21.83% |
| Return on Equity | 12.58% | 8.53% |
| Return on Assets | 1.08% | 0.66% |
| Debt/Equity | 2.62 | 4.11 |
WFC's return on assets at 1.08% also surpasses C's 0.66%. These metrics highlight WFC's greater efficiency in generating profits from its assets and equity, making it the more profitable entity.
Earnings Reality Check
WFC
Last 5 Qs: WFC beat estimates 3x out of 5. Fell 2x after beats. (Sell the news?)
C
Last 4 Qs: C beat estimates 4x out of 4. Rose 3x after beats.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | WFC | C |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 49.19 | 54.98 |
| 50-Day MA | $84.82 | $136.35 |
| 200-Day MA | $84.91 | $119.90 |
Wells Fargo (WFC) shows a more balanced technical picture. Its RSI is 49.19, indicating neutral momentum, and its MACD is positive at 0.78, suggesting upward pressure. WFC is trading above its 50-day ($84.82) and 200-day ($84.91) moving averages. Citigroup (C), while also trading above its 200-day average ($119.90), has a slightly higher RSI of 54.98 and a negative MACD of -0.28, hinting at potential waning momentum. C's 50-day SMA is $136.35, with the price currently trading just above it.
AI Analyst Sentiment
WFC
Hold
Technical Score: 55/100
C
Hold
Technical Score: 55/100
Its lower P/E ratio and stronger profitability could attract value-oriented investors. Citigroup's (C) higher revenue growth might appeal to growth-focused investors, but the current technicals and profit margins suggest a more cautious approach might be warranted.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | WFC | C |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 0.92 | 1.10 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.60 | 1.16 |
For Wells Fargo (WFC), key risks include potential regulatory scrutiny, ongoing integration challenges from past acquisitions, and sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations impacting its net interest margin. Competition within the banking sector remains intense. For Citigroup (C), risks include its complex global operations, potential for further restructuring charges, and exposure to volatile international markets. Both banks face macroeconomic headwinds such as inflation and potential economic slowdowns.
Comparative ProTips
- Prioritize WFC for its superior profitability and more attractive valuation multiples.
- Monitor C's ability to translate its higher revenue growth into improved profit margins.
- Consider WFC's dividend yield as a component of total return, which is slightly higher than C's.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
WFC
Current: $87.83
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$83.44
Aggressive
$87.83
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$80.94
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$87.61
+10%
$91.78
+15%
$95.95
C
Current: $136.63
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$129.79
Aggressive
$136.63
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$125.90
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$136.28
+10%
$142.77
+15%
$149.26
Calculate Your Trade
ℹ️ Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored WFC based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.