Jump to any asset
849 assets, updated daily
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
VOO wins due to its superior income generation and lower expense ratio, offering a more cost-effective way to gain broad U.S. market exposure. While both ETFs provide diversified exposure, VOO's higher dividend yield and significantly lower fees make it the preferred choice for income-focused investors seeking efficiency. VT offers global diversification but comes with a higher cost and a lower current income stream. The choice hinges on whether the investor prioritizes U.S. market efficiency and income (VOO) or global diversification at a higher cost (VT). VOO's advantage in income is clear, with a dividend yield of 1.05% compared to VT's 1.56%. However, when considering the total cost of ownership, VOO's expense ratio of 0.03% is half of VT's 0.06%, making VOO the more efficient vehicle for long-term investment. Despite VT's broader global mandate, VOO's strong trailing returns, particularly over longer periods like 5 and 10 years, suggest its U.S.-centric strategy has been highly effective. Investors seeking a core U.S. equity holding with a focus on income and cost efficiency will find VOO to be the superior option.
Key Differentiator
The key differentiator between VOO and VT lies in their investment scope and associated costs. VOO offers highly efficient, low-cost exposure to the U.S. large-cap market, making it ideal for investors prioritizing cost savings and U.S. equity performance. VT, conversely, provides global diversification but at a higher expense ratio, which can compound over time and detract from overall returns. VOO's expense ratio of 0.03% is half of VT's 0.06%, translating to a $3 per $10,000 investment versus $6. This cost difference, coupled with VOO's strong historical performance and higher dividend yield, positions it as the more attractive option for cost-conscious investors focused on the U.S. market.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for VOO is positive, driven by the continued strength and innovation within the U.S. large-cap sector, particularly technology. Despite current technical indicators suggesting consolidation, the underlying fundamentals of U.S. corporations and VOO's low cost structure provide a solid foundation for future growth. A scenario of continued economic expansion in the U.S. would favor VOO. VT's outlook is more mixed due to its global diversification. While it benefits from potential growth in emerging markets, it is also susceptible to global economic slowdowns, geopolitical tensions, and currency fluctuations. A scenario where global growth accelerates and international markets outperform the U.S. would benefit VT. However, persistent global economic uncertainty may favor VOO's more focused U.S. strategy in the near to medium term.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $578.46 - $716.39 | $133.65 - $162.71 |
| Prev. Close | $702.56 | $159.94 |
| 24h Volume | 6.79M | 2.60M |
VOO's valuation is implicitly tied to the broad U.S. equity market it tracks, which is currently trading with a slight downward bias based on its price relative to its 52-week range. VOO's price is approximately 77% of the way up its 52-week range ($699.30 vs. $578.46 to $716.40), indicating it is trading closer to its high than its low. This suggests a market that has appreciated significantly but may be facing some resistance. VT, representing global equities, also shows a similar valuation posture, trading at roughly 77% of its 52-week range ($158.73 vs. $133.65 to $162.71). Both ETFs are exhibiting similar price action relative to their historical performance, suggesting that broad market trends are influencing both U.S. and global equity valuations similarly at this time. Neither ETF offers traditional valuation metrics like P/E ratios, as they are broad market vehicles.
Market Performance
| Metric | VOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 11.40% | 12.14% |
| 24h Range | $696.72 - $701.85 | $158.08 - $159.40 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 47.4 | 45.8 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bullish | Bullish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~12%). Market momentum is currently Bullish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.42 | 45.80 |
| 50-Day MA | $697.61 | $158.60 |
| 200-Day MA | $657.18 | $150.02 |
VOO is currently exhibiting signs of consolidation, with its price trading below its 20-day exponential moving average ($702.85) but above its 50-day simple moving average ($697.61). The Commodity Channel Index (CCI) at -105.02 and the Stochastic Oscillator at 21.95 suggest that the ETF is in oversold territory, indicating potential for a bounce. The MACD at 0.57 is slightly positive but trending downwards, signaling weakening upward momentum. VT is also showing signs of weakness, trading below its 20-day EMA ($160.08) and slightly above its 50-day SMA ($158.60). Its CCI of -130.93 and Stochastic of 24.39 also point to oversold conditions. The MACD for VT is at 0.20, which is positive but trending lower, mirroring VOO's weakening momentum. Both ETFs are in similar technical positions, suggesting a potential near-term stabilization or slight rebound, but neither shows strong conviction for an immediate upward trend.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VOO
Technical Score: 75/100
VT
Technical Score: 55/100
As broad-market ETFs, VOO and VT do not have analyst ratings or median price targets in the traditional sense. Sentiment for these instruments is primarily driven by overall market sentiment and investor flows into broad equity exposure. The current technical indicators for both ETFs, such as their oversold readings on the CCI and Stochastic, suggest a neutral to slightly bearish short-term sentiment. However, the long-term trailing returns, particularly for VOO over 5 and 10 years, indicate sustained positive investor sentiment and confidence in the U.S. market. VT's global diversification also garners positive sentiment for those seeking worldwide exposure. The lack of specific analyst data means sentiment must be inferred from price action and historical performance.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VOO | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.70 | 0.75 |
The primary risk for VOO lies in its heavy concentration in the U.S. market, particularly within the technology sector. A significant downturn in the U.S. economy or a sharp correction in tech stocks could disproportionately impact VOO's performance. Also, as a large-cap focused ETF, it may not capture the growth potential of smaller, more agile companies. VT's risk profile is more diversified globally, which can mitigate single-country or single-sector downturns. However, it introduces currency risk and exposure to geopolitical instability in various regions. Economic slowdowns in major international markets or adverse currency movements could negatively affect VT's returns. The higher expense ratio for VT also represents a drag on performance over the long term, acting as a persistent risk to total returns.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VOO for core U.S. equity exposure due to its lower cost and higher dividend yield, especially if global diversification is not a primary concern.
- For investors seeking global diversification, VT is a viable option, but be mindful of the higher expense ratio and potential currency headwinds.
- Evaluate your investment horizon and risk tolerance; VOO's historical performance suggests a strong track record for long-term U.S. market investors.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VOO
Current: $699.30
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$664.33
Aggressive
$699.30
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$644.40
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$697.55
+10%
$730.77
+15%
$763.99
VT
Current: $158.73
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$150.79
Aggressive
$158.73
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$146.27
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$158.33
+10%
$165.87
+15%
$173.41
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VOO based on risk profile. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, VOO or VT?+
VOO is a better buy for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and U.S. market exposure, offering a lower expense ratio and higher dividend yield. VT is suitable for those seeking global diversification despite its higher costs.
What are the key risks for VOO vs VT?+
VOO's main risk is its U.S. market concentration, particularly in technology. VT's risks include global economic slowdowns, geopolitical instability, and currency fluctuations.
How do their expense ratios compare?+
VOO has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.03% compared to VT's 0.06%, making VOO more cost-effective for long-term investors.
Which ETF offers a higher dividend yield?+
VT currently offers a higher dividend yield of 1.56% compared to VOO's 1.05%.
How do their long-term returns compare?+
VOO has demonstrated stronger trailing returns over 5 and 10-year periods compared to VT, indicating superior performance in its U.S. market focus.
What is the net asset size of each ETF?+
VOO has substantially larger net assets of $1.74 trillion, indicating greater investor adoption and liquidity compared to VT's $101.67 billion.
How concentrated are their sector holdings?+
Both ETFs show a significant concentration in Technology, with VOO at 37.43% and VT at 29.19%. VOO also has a notable allocation to Healthcare at 9.1%.