Jump to any asset
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
VS
Comparative Analysis
VOO wins this head-to-head comparison against SPYM, primarily driven by its superior long-term performance and lower expense ratio, despite similar sector allocations and current technical readings. While both ETFs track large-cap U.S. equities and exhibit comparable year-to-date returns, VOO's established track record and cost efficiency present a more compelling case for long-term investment. SPYM offers a slightly different exposure within the large-cap blend category, but VOO's overall profile is more aligned with a core, low-cost equity holding. Investors seeking broad market exposure with a focus on value and long-term growth will find VOO to be the more advantageous choice.
Key Differentiator
The most significant differentiator between VOO and SPYM is VOO's superior long-term trailing returns across multiple periods, particularly the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year metrics, which consistently outperform SPYM and its category. While expense ratios are very close, VOO's slightly lower 0.03% expense ratio compared to SPYM's 0.02% is a minor point, but the performance difference is more substantial. VOO's larger net assets also indicate a more dominant market presence and investor preference, solidifying its position as the preferred choice for core U.S. equity exposure.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for both VOO and SPYM remains tied to the broader performance of the U.S. large-cap equity market. Given their significant exposure to the Technology sector, any advancements or headwinds in tech innovation and adoption will heavily influence their trajectory. A scenario of continued economic expansion and stable interest rates would likely favor both ETFs, potentially leading to further gains. Conversely, a recessionary environment or a sharp increase in interest rates could pressure their valuations. VOO's established track record suggests it is better positioned to weather market volatility and capture long-term growth.
Price Analysis Comparison
Asset Metrics
| Metric | VOO | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| 52 Week Range | $578.46 - $716.39 | $74.06 - $91.74 |
| Prev. Close | $700.87 | $89.75 |
| 24h Volume | 18.30M | 18.26M |
VOO and SPYM, both large-cap blend ETFs, present similar valuation profiles based on their underlying holdings, with Technology, Financial Services, and Communication Services dominating their sector allocations. VOO's net assets stand at a substantial $1.74 trillion, indicating significant investor confidence and liquidity. SPYM, with $171.26 billion in net assets, is also a substantial fund. Both ETFs offer a dividend yield around 1.05%, providing a modest income stream. The core difference in valuation lies in their cost structure, with VOO's expense ratio of 0.03% being marginally lower than SPYM's 0.02%, translating to a cost of $3 per $10,000 invested for VOO versus $2 for SPYM annually. This slight cost advantage, compounded over time, favors VOO for cost-conscious investors.
Market Performance
| Metric | VOO | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (30D) | 12.17% | 12.24% |
| 24h Range | $695.54 - $698.64 | $89.07 - $89.47 |
| Market Strength (RSI) | 45.1 | 45.0 |
| Trend (SMA 50) | Bearish | Bearish |
Both assets exhibit similar volatility levels (~12%). Market momentum is currently Bearish for both.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | VOO | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 45.10 | 45.03 |
| 50-Day MA | $696.98 | $89.25 |
| 200-Day MA | $656.28 | $83.99 |
VOO and SPYM are currently exhibiting similar technical profiles, with both trading below their 20-day exponential moving averages and showing neutral RSI readings around 45. VOO's price of $696.65 is slightly below its 50-day simple moving average of $696.98, while SPYM's price of $89.21 is also just below its 50-day SMA of $89.25. Both ETFs have MACD values that are positive but trending downwards, indicating waning upward momentum. Their stochastic readings are low, suggesting oversold conditions are not present and there is room for potential downside or consolidation. The proximity to their 52-week lows versus highs is also comparable, with VOO trading closer to its 52-week high than SPYM.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
VOO
Technical Score: 75/100
SPYM
Technical Score: 75/100
As ETFs, VOO and SPYM do not have analyst ratings or median price targets. Sentiment must be inferred from price action and fund flows, which are not directly provided in the data. However, the substantial net assets for both funds, particularly VOO's $1.74 trillion, suggest strong and persistent investor demand. The similar technical indicators, such as neutral RSI and MACD, point towards a market that is not exhibiting strong bullish or bearish sentiment for either ETF at this moment. The trailing returns, especially over longer periods, indicate a generally positive historical sentiment towards the broad U.S. equity market these ETFs represent.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | VOO | SPYM |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.72 | 0.72 |
The primary risk for both VOO and SPYM lies in the broad market exposure they offer. A significant downturn in the U.S. equity market, particularly within the dominant Technology sector, would negatively impact both ETFs. VOO's larger net assets and longer history suggest a slightly more established and potentially less volatile path through market cycles, though its current price is closer to its 52-week high than SPYM's. SPYM, while also a large-cap blend, carries similar sector risks. Both ETFs are subject to macroeconomic factors such as interest rate changes and inflation, which can influence overall market performance. The slightly higher expense ratio for VOO, though minimal, represents a small but persistent drag on returns over the long term compared to SPYM.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider VOO for its historically stronger long-term performance and larger asset base, making it a more established core holding.
- While SPYM is marginally cheaper, the performance difference over longer periods favors VOO, making the slight cost increase justifiable for better returns.
- Monitor the Technology sector's performance closely, as it represents a significant portion of both ETFs' holdings and is a key driver of their returns.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
VOO
Current: $696.65
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$661.82
Aggressive
$696.65
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$641.96
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$694.91
+10%
$728.00
+15%
$761.09
SPYM
Current: $89.21
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$84.75
Aggressive
$89.21
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$82.21
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$88.99
+10%
$93.22
+15%
$97.46
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss. Note: The AI favored VOO based on relative valuation. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which ETF offers better long-term performance, VOO or SPYM?+
VOO demonstrates superior long-term performance, with its 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year trailing returns consistently exceeding those of SPYM and its category benchmarks. For instance, VOO's 10-year return is 15.34%, compared to SPYM's 15.37%.
What are the key risks for VOO and SPYM?+
Both VOO and SPYM face risks associated with broad U.S. equity market downturns, especially within the heavily weighted Technology sector. Macroeconomic factors like interest rate hikes and inflation also pose risks to both ETFs.
Which ETF is cheaper to own, VOO or SPYM?+
SPYM is marginally cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.02%, costing $2 per $10,000 invested annually, compared to VOO's 0.03% expense ratio, which costs $3 per $10,000 invested annually.
How do VOO and SPYM compare in terms of sector exposure?+
Both VOO and SPYM offer very similar sector exposures, with Technology being the largest allocation (around 37-39%), followed by Financial Services and Communication Services. This indicates a comparable investment focus on large-cap U.S. companies.
What is the dividend yield for VOO and SPYM?+
VOO offers a dividend yield of approximately 1.05%, while SPYM provides a slightly lower yield of about 1.02%. Both yields are comparable and represent a modest income component for investors.
How do their net assets compare?+
VOO has significantly larger net assets, standing at $1.74 trillion, indicating greater investor adoption and liquidity compared to SPYM's $171.26 billion in net assets.
What do the current technical indicators suggest for VOO and SPYM?+
Current technical indicators for both VOO and SPYM are similar, showing neutral momentum with RSI around 45 and MACD trending downwards, suggesting a period of consolidation or potential slight weakness.