Jump to any asset
Tesla vs Amazon.com
VS
Comparative Analysis
Amazon (AMZN) wins this head-to-head comparison against Tesla (TSLA), primarily driven by its superior profitability and more balanced valuation. While TSLA exhibits stronger revenue growth, AMZN's significantly higher net profit margins and return on equity present a more compelling investment case for sustained value creation. AMZN's current price also reflects a more attractive valuation relative to its earnings potential compared to TSLA's elevated P/E ratio. The technicals show TSLA with a slight edge in momentum, but AMZN's fundamental strength outweighs this in the current assessment. AMZN's diversified business model, encompassing e-commerce, cloud computing, and digital advertising, provides a more stable and predictable earnings stream. TSLA, while a leader in the EV market, faces greater cyclicality and competitive pressures. The analyst community overwhelmingly favors AMZN, with a higher median target price relative to its current trading level, further solidifying its position as the preferred asset in this comparison.
Key Differentiator
Amazon's (AMZN) superior profitability and more balanced valuation serve as the key differentiator against Tesla (TSLA). AMZN's net profit margin of 17.44% and ROE of 30.56% far exceed TSLA's figures, demonstrating a more efficient and value-generating business model. Coupled with a P/E ratio of 20.3 compared to TSLA's 346.2, AMZN offers a more compelling investment proposition for investors prioritizing sustainable earnings and reasonable valuation over speculative growth.
Joint Outlook
The outlook for Amazon (AMZN) appears more stable and favorable than for Tesla (TSLA) in the next 6-12 months. AMZN's diversified revenue streams from e-commerce, AWS, and advertising provide a resilient foundation, even amidst potential economic slowdowns. Its strong profitability and positive analyst sentiment suggest continued upward potential, with the median target price indicating significant room for appreciation. The company's ongoing investments in logistics and cloud infrastructure are expected to support long-term growth. Tesla (TSLA) faces a more uncertain outlook. While its market leadership in EVs is strong, increasing competition from legacy automakers and new entrants poses a significant challenge. Execution on new technologies like full self-driving and scaling production of new models will be critical. TSLA's high valuation means it is vulnerable to market sentiment shifts and any stumbles in meeting its aggressive growth targets, potentially leading to higher volatility compared to AMZN.
Price Analysis Comparison
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | TSLA | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio | 346.25 | 20.28 |
| Market Cap | 1.44T | 2.72T |
| Price/Sales | 13.86 | 3.50 |
| Price/Book | 16.53 | 4.92 |
| EV/EBITDA | 131.02 | 16.88 |
| Dividend Yield | N/A | N/A |
Amazon (AMZN) presents a more attractive valuation profile than Tesla (TSLA) at current levels. AMZN trades at a P/E ratio of 20.3, which is significantly lower than TSLA's P/E of 346.2. This suggests that investors are paying a substantially higher multiple for TSLA's earnings. While TSLA's revenue growth of 25.5% outpaces AMZN's 19.6%, the disparity in earnings multiples indicates that AMZN offers better value for its earnings power. TSLA's price is currently trading below its 200-day moving average ($399.05), indicating potential resistance, whereas AMZN is trading above its 200-day moving average ($239.62), suggesting a more constructive technical backdrop for valuation. TSLA's price is also closer to its 52-week high (363.56 vs 498.83) than AMZN (251.89 vs 287.20), implying less room for immediate upside based on historical price action alone. However, the stark difference in P/E ratios is the dominant factor, positioning AMZN as the more reasonably valued asset for investors seeking earnings-based returns.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | TSLA | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Rev. Growth (Qtly) | 25.50% | 19.60% |
| Profit Margin | 3.67% | 17.44% |
| Return on Equity | 4.67% | 30.56% |
| Return on Assets | 1.93% | 6.59% |
| Debt/Equity | 18.37 | 45.62 |
Amazon (AMZN) significantly outperforms Tesla (TSLA) in terms of profitability. AMZN boasts a net profit margin of 17.44%, which is substantially higher than TSLA's 3.67%. This indicates that AMZN is far more effective at converting its revenue into actual profit. Furthermore, AMZN's return on equity (ROE) stands at an impressive 30.56%, dwarfing TSLA's 4.67% ROE. This suggests that AMZN generates much higher returns for its shareholders relative to the equity invested. The return on assets (ROA) also favors AMZN, with a 6.59% compared to TSLA's 1.93%. This highlights AMZN's superior efficiency in utilizing its assets to generate earnings. While TSLA's revenue growth is higher, AMZN's ability to translate that growth into superior profitability and shareholder returns makes it the more fundamentally sound investment from a profit perspective.
Earnings Reality Check
TSLA
Last 5 Qs: TSLA beat estimates 3x out of 5. Fell 2x after beats. (Sell the news?)
AMZN
Last 2 Qs: AMZN did not beat estimates in recent quarters.
Technical Indicators
| Indicator | TSLA | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 56.37 | 40.53 |
| 50-Day MA | $355.70 | $254.95 |
| 200-Day MA | $399.05 | $239.62 |
Tesla (TSLA) shows stronger current momentum according to technical indicators. Its RSI is at 56.37, indicating a neutral to slightly positive momentum, and its MACD value of 4.95 suggests an upward trend. TSLA is trading above its 50-day moving average ($355.70) and its 20-day exponential moving average ($355.60), confirming short-term strength. However, it is trading below its 200-day moving average ($399.05), which could act as resistance. Amazon (AMZN) exhibits weaker short-term momentum with an RSI of 40.53 and a negative MACD of -0.88, suggesting downward pressure. AMZN is trading below its 20-day EMA ($258.04) and its 50-day SMA ($254.95), indicating near-term weakness. Despite this, AMZN is trading above its 200-day SMA ($239.62), which provides a longer-term support level. TSLA's technicals are currently more constructive for short-term upside, but AMZN's longer-term support is noteworthy.
AI Analyst Sentiment
Technical rating — based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.
TSLA
Technical Score: 59/100
AMZN
Technical Score: 79/100
The analyst community overwhelmingly favors Amazon (AMZN) over Tesla (TSLA). AMZN has a median analyst target price of $325.50, which represents a significant upside potential from its current price of $251.89. The analyst ratings for AMZN are heavily skewed towards buys, with 15 Strong Buys and 44 Buys, against only 2 Holds and no Sell ratings from 61 analysts. This indicates strong institutional conviction in AMZN's future performance. In contrast, TSLA's median analyst target price is $410.00, which also suggests upside from its current price of $363.56. However, the analyst ratings for TSLA are more mixed, with 4 Strong Buys and 16 Buys, but also 20 Holds and 5 Sell ratings from 45 analysts. This divided sentiment suggests less uniform confidence in TSLA compared to the strong consensus supporting AMZN.
Risk Stratification
| Metric | TSLA | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (Volatility) | 1.85 | 1.44 |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.57 | 0.35 |
Tesla (TSLA) faces significant risks related to increased competition in the electric vehicle market, potential regulatory scrutiny, and execution risks associated with its ambitious expansion plans, including new factories and autonomous driving technology. Its high valuation also makes it susceptible to sharp pullbacks if growth expectations are not met or if macroeconomic conditions deteriorate. Furthermore, reliance on key personnel like Elon Musk introduces a concentration risk. Amazon (AMZN) is exposed to risks such as intensifying competition in e-commerce and cloud computing (AWS), potential regulatory challenges related to antitrust concerns, and the operational complexities of its vast logistics network. While its profitability is strong, a significant slowdown in consumer spending or a downturn in the cloud market could impact its growth trajectory. Additionally, the company's substantial investments in new ventures carry inherent risks of not yielding expected returns.
Comparative ProTips
- Consider AMZN for its strong profitability and more reasonable valuation, offering a potentially more stable investment.
- Monitor TSLA's ability to meet ambitious growth targets and navigate increasing EV competition, as its valuation is highly sensitive to performance.
- For investors seeking exposure to growth, AMZN's diversified business provides a blend of e-commerce and cloud services, potentially offering more resilience than TSLA's EV focus.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative
3%
Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$
✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
TSLA
Current: $363.56
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$345.38
Aggressive
$363.56
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$335.02
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$362.65
+10%
$379.92
+15%
$397.19
AMZN
Current: $251.89
ENTRY ZONES
Conservative
$239.30
Aggressive
$251.89
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$232.12
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$251.26
+10%
$263.23
+15%
$275.19
Calculate Your Trade
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (TSLA). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices. Note: The AI favored AMZN based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is a better buy, AMZN or TSLA?+
AMZN is the preferred buy due to its superior profitability (17.44% net margin vs 3.67% for TSLA) and more attractive valuation (P/E of 20.3 vs 346.2 for TSLA). While TSLA has higher revenue growth, AMZN's fundamental strength and analyst consensus favor it.
What are the key risks for AMZN vs TSLA?+
TSLA faces risks from EV competition, regulatory scrutiny, and execution on new tech. AMZN's risks include e-commerce/cloud competition, antitrust concerns, and consumer spending slowdowns.
How do AMZN and TSLA compare on profitability?+
AMZN is significantly more profitable, with a net profit margin of 17.44% and ROE of 30.56%, compared to TSLA's 3.67% net margin and 4.67% ROE.
What is the valuation difference between AMZN and TSLA?+
AMZN trades at a P/E of 20.3, while TSLA's P/E is a much higher 346.2, indicating AMZN is more attractively valued relative to its earnings.
How do analyst ratings compare for AMZN and TSLA?+
Analysts overwhelmingly favor AMZN with a strong buy consensus (61 analysts, 15 strong buy, 44 buy) and a median target of $325.50, versus TSLA which has a more mixed rating (45 analysts, 4 strong buy, 16 buy) and a median target of $410.
What are the technical outlooks for AMZN and TSLA?+
TSLA shows stronger short-term momentum (RSI 56.37, positive MACD) and is above its 50-day SMA. AMZN exhibits weaker short-term momentum (RSI 40.53, negative MACD) but remains above its 200-day SMA.
How does revenue growth compare between AMZN and TSLA?+
TSLA leads in revenue growth at 25.5%, while AMZN follows with 19.6%. However, AMZN's profitability metrics are substantially stronger.