TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

U.S. Bancorp vs The PNC Financial Services Group

Stock·NYSE

U.S. Bancorp USB

$58.73 ▲ 2.33%
Buy
70 / 100 AI score
Full USB analysis →
vs

Stock·NYSE

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. PNC

$217.39 ▲ 1.14%
Sell
25 / 100 AI score
Full PNC analysis →
01

The short version

How USB and PNC compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

USB and PNC on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours PNC
USB PNC
70/100 AI score 25/100
+28.7% 1-year change +21.9%
23.7% Volatility (30d, yearly) 19.5%
50.5 RSI (14-day) 34.1
11.6x P/E ratio 12.1x
3.66% Dividend yield 3.40%
The verdict
PNC wins this head-to-head comparison against USB, primarily driven by its superior revenue growth and a more attractive valuation profile. While both banks offer solid profitability metrics and analyst support, PNC's ability to expand its top line more aggressively and trade at a slightly more favorable P/E ratio gives it an edge. USB's recent price action has been stronger, but PNC's fundamental improvements suggest a more sustainable outperformance. PNC's higher revenue growth rate of 23.6% compared to USB's 10.4% indicates a stronger business expansion. Although USB has shown better recent price momentum, PNC's valuation at a P/E of 12.08 versus USB's 11.59, coupled with its higher revenue growth, presents a more compelling investment case for value-oriented investors. Both banks exhibit similar returns on equity and assets, but PNC's top-line momentum is the deciding factor.
Key difference
PNC's significantly higher revenue growth rate of 23.6% is the key differentiator against USB's 10.4%. This superior top-line expansion suggests a more dynamic business model and greater market penetration, making its current valuation more compelling despite a slightly higher P/E ratio. While USB shows better recent price momentum, PNC's fundamental growth trajectory offers a more sustainable basis for future outperformance.
Outlook
The outlook for both USB and PNC is cautiously optimistic, with PNC appearing to have a stronger foundation for near-term outperformance. PNC's strong revenue growth suggests it can continue to capture market share and potentially outperform its current valuation. If PNC can maintain its growth trajectory and benefit from a potential economic upswing, its stock could see significant appreciation towards its analyst targets. USB faces a more challenging path, needing to reignite its revenue growth and overcome its current technical resistance. While its recent price action has been more positive, a sustained rally will depend on broader market conditions and a clear improvement in its fundamental growth drivers. Investors should monitor both for signs of sustained earnings beats and positive shifts in their respective technical trends.
NEXT · 2Price, side by side →
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
USB PNC

Over 1 year: USB gained 26.4% and PNC gained 19.2%, a gap of 7.2 points in USB's favour.

NEXT · 3Valuation and profitability →
03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

USB PNC
$89.4B Market cap $86.7B
11.6x P/E ratio 12.1x
3.3x Price / sales 3.5x
1.5x Price / book 1.5x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

USB PNC
+10.4% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +23.6%
28.5% Net margin 29.9%
12.6% Return on equity 12.6%
1.2% Return on assets 1.3%
0.01 Debt / equity 0.01
On valuation
PNC offers a slightly more attractive valuation than USB, despite a marginally higher P/E ratio. PNC trades at 12.08 times earnings, while USB is valued at 11.59 times earnings. However, PNC's significantly higher revenue growth of 23.6% compared to USB's 10.4% suggests that its current P/E multiple is more justified by its expansionary trajectory. Both companies have analyst median price targets that represent significant upside from current levels, with PNC's target of $275 offering a greater potential return than USB's target of $68. PNC's price is below its 50-day and 200-day moving averages ($235.51 and $228.44), but its current price of $217.39 is closer to its 52-week low ($176.88) than its high ($258.96), suggesting more room for recovery compared to USB's position closer to its 52-week high ($66.08).
On profitability
Both USB and PNC exhibit strong and comparable profitability metrics, making it difficult to differentiate solely on this basis. Both banks report an identical return on equity of 12.62%. PNC holds a slight edge in net profit margin at 31.37% compared to USB's 29.9%. Similarly, PNC's return on assets at 1.31% is marginally better than USB's 1.16%. These figures indicate that both institutions are efficient in converting revenue into profit and effectively utilizing their assets. However, PNC's slightly superior net profit margin and return on assets suggest a marginally more efficient operational structure, which, when combined with its higher revenue growth, presents a more compelling overall financial picture.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

USB

Beat the estimate in 8 of 8 reports; fell the next session after 1 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Jan '25Jul '25Jan '26Jul '26

PNC

Beat the estimate in 6 of 6 reports; fell the next session after 3 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Jan '25Jul '25Jul '26
NEXT · 4Momentum and sentiment →
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

USB PNC
70/100 AI score 25/100
50.5 RSI (14-day) 34.1
-3.4% Price against 50-day average -7.7%
+1.6% Price against 200-day average -4.8%
Technicals
USB displays stronger recent technical momentum than PNC. USB's RSI is at 50.54, indicating neutral momentum, and its Stochastic is high at 87.57, suggesting it is approaching overbought territory. Its price is currently below its 20-day EMA ($58.14), 50-day SMA ($60.83), and 200-day SMA ($57.81), signaling some short-term weakness. Its price is below its 20-day EMA ($222.55), 50-day SMA ($235.51), and 200-day SMA ($228.44). While USB's technicals suggest a potential for further upside if it can break through its moving averages, PNC's current technicals point to a potential bounce from oversold levels.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment strongly favors both USB and PNC, with a significant majority recommending a 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy'. USB has 24 analysts covering it, with 3 'Strong Buy', 13 'Buy', and 8 'Hold' ratings. PNC has 23 analysts, with 5 'Strong Buy', 11 'Buy', and 7 'Hold' ratings. Both stocks have zero 'Sell' or 'Strong Sell' recommendations. The median analyst target for USB is $68, suggesting approximately 15.77% upside from its current price. PNC's median target is $275, implying a much larger potential upside of approximately 26.50% from its current price. This suggests that while analysts are broadly positive on both, they see greater upside potential in PNC.
NEXT · 5Risk and practical tips →
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

USB PNC
23.7% Volatility (30d, yearly) 19.5%
1.02 Beta against the S&P 500 0.93
0.57 Sharpe ratio 0.40
Risk
The primary risk for USB lies in its slowing revenue growth and its current technical positioning below key moving averages, which could signal further downside if broader market sentiment shifts. A failure to rebound from these levels could lead to further price depreciation. While its revenue growth is strong, any slowdown in this area would significantly impact its valuation premium. Both banks face general interest rate sensitivity inherent to the banking sector.
ProTips
  1. Focus on PNC's revenue growth as the primary driver for its investment case, as it significantly outpaces USB.
  2. Consider USB if short-term technical momentum is your sole focus, but be aware of its decelerating revenue growth.
  3. Both banks are solid, but PNC's combination of growth and analyst target upside makes it the more compelling value bet.
NEXT · 6Long-term scenarios →
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

NEXT · 7Trade plans for both →
07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
USB
Current: $58.73
ENTRY ZONES
$55.79
$58.73
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$54.12
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$61.67
+10% from current
$64.60
+15% from current
$67.54
PNC
Current: $217.39
ENTRY ZONES
$206.52
$217.39
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$200.32
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$228.26
+10% from current
$239.13
+15% from current
$250.00
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored PNC based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While USB currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (70 vs 25), the AI favors PNC on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.
NEXT · 8Questions people ask →
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, USB or PNC?+
PNC is the preferred buy due to its superior revenue growth (23.6% vs 10.4%) and strong analyst conviction with a higher median price target. While USB shows better recent technicals, PNC's fundamental expansion offers a more sustainable investment case.
How do USB and PNC compare on profitability?+
Both banks exhibit strong and similar profitability, with identical return on equity (12.62%).
What are the dividend yields for USB and PNC?+
USB offers a dividend yield of approximately 3.66%, while PNC provides a yield of about 3.40%. Both offer comparable income streams to investors.
How do the P/E ratios compare?+
USB trades at a P/E of 11.59, while PNC trades at a P/E of 12.08. PNC's slightly higher P/E is justified by its significantly stronger revenue growth.
How have USB and PNC performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 16, 2026, USB's price rose 28.7% and PNC's rose 21.9%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, USB or PNC?+
USB has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 16, 2026, USB's annualized volatility was 23.7% and PNC's 19.5%, measured from daily closing prices.
NEXT · 9Keep exploring →

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of USB vs PNC is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 16, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.