TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 849 assets, updated daily

Costco Wholesale vs Walmart

COST

Costco Wholesale Corp NASDAQ

$946.92 ▼ 0.11%
VS

WMT

Walmart Inc. NASDAQ

$111.35 ▲ 0.71%
Last updated: • COST at $946.92, WMT at $111.35
CleaRank Financial AI • Data from TwelveData
Reviewed by CleaRank editorial team. Data refreshed daily. Not financial advice.

Comparative Analysis

Costco Wholesale (COST) wins this head-to-head comparison against Walmart (WMT), primarily driven by superior profitability metrics and stronger recent earnings performance. While both retailers operate in the defensive consumer staples sector, COST demonstrates higher efficiency in converting revenue into profit and stronger returns on shareholder equity. WMT, despite its larger market capitalization and broader reach, shows a less compelling profitability profile and mixed recent earnings reactions. COST's current technicals also suggest a stronger upward momentum, although both are trading near their 52-week highs. COST's higher net profit margin and return on equity, coupled with a more consistent positive reaction to its latest earnings reports, position it as the more attractive investment at this juncture. WMT's larger scale does not translate into superior operational efficiency or profitability in this comparison. Therefore, COST's stronger fundamental performance and technical setup make it the preferred choice.

Key Differentiator

The primary differentiator between Costco Wholesale (COST) and Walmart (WMT) lies in their profitability and efficiency metrics. COST consistently demonstrates higher returns on equity and assets, coupled with a slightly better net profit margin, indicating superior operational performance and value creation from its investments. While WMT benefits from a larger scale and market presence, COST's ability to generate more profit from its resources gives it a distinct advantage. This profitability edge, combined with COST's stronger recent earnings reactions and more bullish technical momentum, solidifies its position as the preferred investment. Investors are essentially paying a premium for COST's demonstrably more efficient and profitable business model.

Joint Outlook

The outlook for both Costco Wholesale (COST) and Walmart (WMT) remains positive, supported by their essential nature as consumer staples retailers. For COST, continued membership growth and its ability to maintain its value proposition will be key drivers. We anticipate COST to continue its upward trajectory, potentially testing higher price levels as its operational efficiencies translate into sustained earnings growth. A scenario where COST breaks through its 200-day SMA ($963.47) could signal a new leg higher. For WMT, sustained execution of its omnichannel strategy and effective cost management will be critical. While WMT faces challenges related to its scale, its strong market position provides a defensive buffer. A potential scenario for WMT involves consolidating its gains and building support around its current price levels, with a continued upward trend supported by its dividend. Both companies are well-positioned to work through the current economic environment, but COST's stronger profitability gives it a slight edge in performance potential.

Price Analysis Comparison

Valuation Metrics i

Valuation Metrics: COST vs WMT
Metric COST WMT
P/E Ratio 45.41 40.30
Market Cap 419.61B 883.42B
Price/Sales 1.38 1.20
Price/Book 11.67 8.99
EV/EBITDA 28.65 21.06
Dividend Yield 0.59% 0.89%
Costco Wholesale (COST) trades at a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of 45.41, which is higher than Walmart's (WMT) P/E of 40.30. This suggests that investors are willing to pay a premium for COST's earnings compared to WMT. Both companies exhibit relatively high P/E ratios, indicating that they are not significantly undervalued. However, COST's higher P/E is supported by its superior profitability and growth metrics, as detailed in other sections. WMT's valuation, while slightly lower, does not reflect the same level of operational efficiency or return generation as COST. When considering market capitalization, WMT at $883.4 billion is significantly larger than COST at $419.6 billion. This reflects WMT's broader global presence and larger revenue base. Despite the difference in scale, COST's valuation appears more justified by its profitability and efficiency metrics, suggesting a potentially better risk-reward profile for investors focused on operational performance.

Profitability & Efficiency i

Profitability & Efficiency: COST vs WMT
Metric COST WMT
Rev. Growth (Qtly) 11.10% 5.90%
Profit Margin 3.04% 3.00%
Return on Equity 28.40% 22.31%
Return on Assets 8.66% 6.41%
Debt/Equity 28.44 71.65
Costco Wholesale (COST) exhibits superior profitability compared to Walmart (WMT), boasting a net profit margin of 3.04% versus WMT's 3.00%. While the difference is marginal, COST's return on equity (ROE) stands at a more impressive 28.4%, significantly outperforming WMT's 22.31%. This indicates that COST is more effective at generating profits from shareholder investments. Also, COST's return on assets (ROA) is 8.66%, which is also higher than WMT's 6.41%, suggesting better asset utilization in driving profits. These metrics collectively highlight COST's operational efficiency and its ability to translate its business activities into higher returns for its investors. WMT, despite its larger scale, operates with slightly less profit efficiency and generates lower returns on its equity and assets. This difference in profitability is a key factor in favour of COST.

Earnings Reality Check i

COST

Last 5 Qs: COST beat estimates 3x out of 5. Rose 3x after beats.

WMT

Last 5 Qs: WMT beat estimates 2x out of 5. Fell 2x after beats. (Sell the news?)

Technical Indicators

Technical indicators: COST vs WMT
Indicator COST WMT
RSI (14) 75.39 60.07
50-Day MA $931.43 $108.51
200-Day MA $963.47 $118.17
Costco Wholesale (COST) is exhibiting strong bullish momentum, with its Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 75.39, indicating it is in overbought territory, and its Stochastic Oscillator at 90.98, also signaling overbought conditions. The Commodity Channel Index (CCI) at 140.71 further confirms this strength. COST's price is trading above its 20-day Exponential Moving Average ($925.09) and 50-day Simple Moving Average ($931.43), but below its 200-day SMA ($963.47), suggesting a strong short-to-medium term uptrend with longer-term resistance. Walmart (WMT) shows moderate bullish momentum, with an RSI of 60.07 and a Stochastic Oscillator of 98.03, which is also in overbought territory. Its CCI is at 117.60. WMT's price is trading above its 20-day EMA ($107.66) and 50-day SMA ($108.51), but below its 200-day SMA ($118.17), similar to COST in terms of trend direction. Both stocks are trading closer to their 52-week highs than lows, with COST at $946.92 (vs. $1096.5 high) and WMT at $111.35 (vs. $135.16 high). COST's higher RSI and MACD value suggest stronger current upward momentum.

AI Analyst Sentiment

Technical rating: based on current price action versus moving averages and momentum. This measures short-term chart trend, not analyst opinion or company fundamentals.

COST

Buy
Technical Score: 66/100

WMT

Buy
Technical Score: 76/100
Analyst sentiment for Costco Wholesale (COST) is predominantly positive, with a 'Strong Buy' rating from 4 analysts and 'Buy' ratings from 20, totaling 24 buy-side recommendations against only 1 'Sell' and 1 'Strong Sell' among 39 analysts. The median analyst target price is $1065, suggesting approximately 12.47% upside potential from its current price. Walmart (WMT) also garners strong analyst support, with 10 'Strong Buy' and 27 'Buy' ratings out of 43 analysts, and only 1 'Strong Sell'. Its median target price is $127, indicating about 14.05% upside potential. While both stocks are viewed favorably by analysts, WMT has a slightly higher median target price relative to its current price. However, COST's higher concentration of 'Strong Buy' ratings and its strong recent earnings performance contribute to a strong positive sentiment. The options market analysis for both would provide further insight into short-term sentiment, but based on analyst ratings and targets, both are well-regarded.
Note: While WMT shows stronger short-term technical momentum (Buy 76/100), the AI comparative analysis favors COST (Buy 66/100) based on its overall trend structure, fundamentals, and risk-adjusted outlook.

Risk Stratification i

Risk metrics: COST vs WMT
Metric COST WMT
Beta (Volatility) i 0.87 0.58
Sharpe Ratio 0.21 0.81
For Costco Wholesale (COST), key risks include intense competition within the warehouse club model, potential saturation in existing markets, and the ongoing challenge of managing its vast supply chain efficiently. A significant slowdown in consumer spending, particularly on discretionary items that members purchase at Costco, could impact revenue growth. Also, any missteps in inventory management or a failure to maintain its value proposition could erode customer loyalty. The stock's current overbought technical indicators also present a risk of a short-term pullback. Walmart (WMT) faces risks related to its massive global operations, including currency fluctuations, geopolitical instability in international markets, and regulatory changes. Its sheer size makes it susceptible to shifts in consumer preferences and increased competition from online retailers and discount grocers. WMT's lower profitability margins compared to COST mean it has less buffer against rising costs or price wars. Additionally, its large debt load, if not managed effectively, could become a concern in a rising interest rate environment.

Comparative ProTips

  • Pro Tip: Focus on COST's superior return on equity (ROE) as a key indicator of its efficient capital deployment and profitability.
  • Pro Tip: Monitor WMT's ability to manage its global supply chain and currency risks, as these are significant factors impacting its performance.
  • Pro Tip: Consider the current technical overbought conditions for both stocks; a short-term pullback could present a better entry point for either.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
COST
Current: $946.92
ENTRY ZONES
$899.57
$946.92
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$872.59
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$944.55
+10%
$989.53
+15%
$1,034.51
WMT
Current: $111.35
ENTRY ZONES
$105.78
$111.35
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$102.61
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5%
$111.07
+10%
$116.36
+15%
$121.65
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Identifying the stronger asset is based on relative strength (RS) and technical convergence. Past correlation does not guarantee future lockstep movement. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored COST based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only. While WMT currently shows the stronger short-term technical score (76 vs 66), the AI favors COST on the factors above rather than today's technical setup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is a better buy, COST or WMT?+
Costco (COST) is currently the better buy due to its superior profitability metrics, stronger recent earnings performance, and more strong technical momentum compared to Walmart (WMT). While both are solid retailers, COST's efficiency in generating returns from its assets and equity is more compelling.
What are the key risks for COST vs WMT?+
COST faces risks from intense competition and potential market saturation, while WMT's risks are more tied to its vast global operations, currency fluctuations, and geopolitical instability. Both are susceptible to shifts in consumer spending.
How do COST and WMT compare on valuation?+
COST trades at a higher P/E ratio (45.41) than WMT (40.30), suggesting investors are willing to pay more for COST's earnings, likely due to its stronger profitability. WMT's lower P/E does not reflect the same level of operational efficiency.
Which company has better profitability?+
Costco (COST) has better profitability, evidenced by its higher return on equity (28.4% vs. 22.31%) and return on assets (8.66% vs. 6.41%) compared to Walmart (WMT). COST also has a slightly higher net profit margin.
How has recent earnings performance differed?+
COST showed a strong positive reaction to its latest earnings report, beating estimates and increasing its stock price, whereas WMT's latest report had a mixed price reaction despite beating estimates. COST has demonstrated more consistent positive earnings surprises recently.
What do analysts recommend for COST and WMT?+
Analysts are largely positive on both stocks, with a majority recommending 'Buy' or 'Strong Buy'. WMT has a slightly higher median target price relative to its current price, but COST shows a greater concentration of 'Strong Buy' ratings.
What is the dividend yield for COST and WMT?+
Walmart (WMT) offers a higher dividend yield of approximately 0.89% compared to Costco (COST) at about 0.59%. Investors seeking higher current income might prefer WMT based on this metric alone.

People Also Watch

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of COST vs WMT is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 11, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.