Reviewed by Jacob Bakshi 
Jacob Bakshi
CFD & Options Trading Specialist
Trading CFDs and options has been my playground for years, and I love helping others understand these powerful tools and what makes the financial world tick. My work mostly focuses on giving traders the confidence to make informed decisions with unbiased reviews into platforms that prioritize fair pricing, advanced tools, and reliable execution because In fast-moving markets, every detail matters. I have a background in market analysis and risk management, and I’m always on the lookout for brokers that offer the right tools for serious traders. using our CLEAR™ Methodology The CLEAR™ Score (Credibility, Leverage, Execution, Accessibility, Regulation) is our proprietary ranking system. The CLEAR™ Score provides you with the most accurate and transparent broker ranking after evaluating all the key factors that are crucial for trading success. .
Last fact check on June 17, 2026 by
Michelle Sofia Michelle Sofia
Compliance Analyst • Editorial Review
Michelle is the financial content architect and SEO market analyst at CleaRank, and the final editorial reviewer on every CleaRank publication. With a background in financial journalism and fintech reporting, she fact-checks each broker investigation for accuracy before it goes live.
FundingPips Review 2026
FundingPips is a proprietary trading firm founded in 2022 under CEO Khaled Ayesh, headquartered in Business Bay, Dubai, with a registered entity in Cyprus. In barely three years it has grown into one of the most searched names in the funded-trader space, paying out more than $167 million across over 127,000 verified payouts. The offer is simple on the surface: pass a structured evaluation, trade firm capital from $5,000 up to $100,000, scale as high as $2 million, and keep as much as 100% of the profits. Unlike the wave of short-lived offshore operators that flooded the prop sector and vanished with trader funds, FundingPips has built real volume, strong independent review scores, and a payout record you can verify. Let us break it down using our CLEAR framework.
CLEARâ„¢ CERTIFIED PROP FIRM: 4.4/5
Why Trade with FundingPips
FundingPips reads less like a typical challenge mill and more like a scaling engine. The headline is not the entry price, although $29 for a $5,000 seat is among the lowest in the sector. The headline is the four-level scaling ladder that takes a disciplined trader from a small evaluation account all the way to a $2 million allocation and a 100% profit split, earned through performance rather than paid upgrades.
What stands out is the range of funding routes. A trader who wants the lowest cost can take the 2 Step Pro, a trader who hates phase-gates can buy instant funding through Zero, and a trader who wants the safest math can take the standard two-step with a 10% static drawdown. Few firms cover that many preferences under one roof.
The caveats are real and we weight them. FundingPips is unregulated, it leans on consistency rules and news-window limits in its funded stage, and its live human support is harder to reach than its automated channels. Even so, for traders who treat the rulebook as a system to respect, FundingPips is one of the most complete funded-trader ecosystems on the market.
Pros
Cons
Reputation: Scaled Fast, Backed by Volume
FundingPips earns a strong reputation score on the strength of measurable, verifiable volume. It carries a 4.5 out of 5 average across more than 32,000 independent user reviews, roughly 82% of them five-star, and its payout ledger of $167 million across 127,000+ transactions is independently traceable. The points we hold back come from two places: the firm carries no Tier-1 regulation, and a recurring thread of one-star reviews describes unexpected funded-account closures and occasional payout delays. Verify any firm yourself with the CLEAR Broker Risk Scanner before funding an account.
Additional Website Audit
Metric | Value (from Ahrefs) |
|---|---|
Domain Rating (DR) | 71 |
URL Rating (UR) | 17 |
Backlinks | 126K (486K all-time) |
Referring Domains | 8.2K |
Organic Keywords | 349 |
Monthly Organic Traffic | 298K (value $46.7K) |
Top Country | India (49.6%) |
What Traders Loved
What Traders Hated
Account Types and Fees: Four Models, Low Entry
This is FundingPips at its strongest. Four distinct funding models cover almost every trader profile, entry pricing is among the lowest in the sector, and the 1 Step and 2 Step fees are refunded once you reach your first payout. The only reason this is not a perfect score is that the cheapest model, the 2 Step Pro, and the instant Zero account carry non-refundable fees and tighter rules.
Feature | 1 Step | 2 Step | 2 Step Pro | Zero (Instant) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Phases | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 (instant) |
Profit Target | 10% | 8% then 5% | 6% then 6% | None |
Max Drawdown | 6% static | 10% static | 6% static | 5% trailing |
Daily Drawdown | 3% | 5% | 3% | 3% |
Price (100K) | $555 | $529 | $399 | $499 |
Cheapest (5K) | $59 | $36 | $29 | $69 |
Profit Split | Up to 100% | Up to 100% | Up to 80% | 95% |
Fee Refundable | Yes | Yes | No | No |
What We Liked
What We Did Not Like
Trading Conditions: Tight Spreads, Capped Leverage
FundingPips runs a raw-spread environment with competitive pricing: EUR/USD from 0.1 pip, gold from 10 cents, and US30 around 1.4 points, all below the industry averages we track. Commissions are standard at $5 per round lot on forex and metals, rising to $7 on the Zero account. The main drag on the score is leverage, capped at 1:100 on forex and lower on other classes, plus a list of prohibited strategies and news-window limits.
Feature | 1 Step / 2 Step / Pro | Zero (Instant) |
|---|---|---|
Leverage (Forex) | 1:30 to 1:100 | 1:50 |
Leverage (Metals) | 1:10 to 1:30 | 1:20 |
Leverage (Indices) | 1:5 to 1:20 | 1:20 |
Leverage (Crypto) | 1:1 to 1:2 | 1:2 |
Spreads | Raw, from 0.1 pip EUR/USD | Raw, from 0.1 pip |
Commission | $5 per round lot (FX/metals) | $7 per round lot |
Instruments | About 48 (FX, metals, indices, energy, crypto) | Same range |
News Trading | Allowed in evaluation | Not allowed |
Weekend Holding | Allowed | Not allowed |
Consistency Rule | None by default | 15% |
Inactivity Rule | 30 days | 30 days |
What We Liked
What We Did Not Like
Platforms: Broad Choice, Modern Stack
FundingPips offers a strong platform lineup: MetaTrader 5 for traditionalists, Match Trader for a modern browser experience, and cTrader for depth-of-market traders, all backed by a proprietary web dashboard with an AI assistant. Manual and automated trading are supported across the board. The score loses a little ground because cTrader carries a $20 surcharge and there is no standalone demo account.
Feature | MetaTrader 5 | Match Trader | cTrader |
|---|---|---|---|
Availability | Desktop and mobile | Web and mobile | Web and mobile (+$20) |
Interface | Classic, familiar | Modern, clean | Advanced, DOM-focused |
EAs / Algo | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Best For | EA and indicator users | New and web traders | Order-flow traders |
What We Liked
What We Did Not Like
Payout Process: Fast and Flexible
Payouts are a clear strength. FundingPips offers an unusually wide menu of frequencies, from daily and weekly through to on-demand, and processes withdrawals in 1 to 3 business days with no fees. Methods include bank transfer, Visa and Mastercard, crypto, and Riseworks. Profit splits climb from 60% to 100% depending on cadence and scaling tier. The only marks against it are the consistency rules attached to the faster split options and scattered reports of delays.
What We Liked
What We Did Not Like
Customer Support: Responsive Email, Thin Live Help
Support is FundingPips’ weakest area. Email support is genuinely good, available around the clock and praised for fast, useful replies, and the Discord community is large and active. The problem is live human help: the on-site AI chatbot is limited until you log in, and reviewers report that promised live-agent chat was hard or impossible to reach. Phone support is listed but no number is published.
Channel | Performance |
|---|---|
Email (24/7) | Strong, fast and reliable replies |
Live Chat | Inconsistent, hard to reach a human |
AI Chatbot | Limited until logged in |
Discord | Large and active community |
Phone | Listed, no public number |
Languages | English |
What We Liked
What We Did Not Like
FundingPips FAQ
Disclaimer: This review reflects CleaRank’s independent CLEAR assessment and is not financial advice. Prop-firm rules, fees, and payout terms can change; always verify the current terms on the firm’s own site before purchasing a challenge or funded account.
Jacob Bakshi
I’m Jacob and I specialize in CFDs, options trading, and market analysis. Over the years, I’ve developed a deep understanding of the risks and rewards that come with trading derivatives and survived enough volatility to know that trading is like skydiving: thrilling, but you’d better trust your parachute (or broker). I use CleaRank’s Methodology to test brokers based on their offerings and ensure traders that visit our site have access to brokers that align perfectly with their trading strategies.