TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 844 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock

SoFi Technologies vs Affirm Holdings, Inc. Class A

Stock·NASDAQ

SoFi Technologies, Inc. SOFI

$14.55 ▼ 3.58%
Hold
43 / 100 AI score
Full SOFI analysis →
vs

Stock·NASDAQ

Affirm Holdings, Inc. AFRM

$74.01 ▼ 2.52%
Buy
73 / 100 AI score
Full AFRM analysis →
01

The short version

How SOFI and AFRM compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

SOFI and AFRM on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.

CleaRank Financial AI favours AFRM
SOFI AFRM
43/100 AI score 73/100
-45.2% 1-year change +9.0%
42.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 64.2%
34.7 RSI (14-day) 50.4
29.7x P/E ratio 14.1x
0.00% Dividend yield 0.00%
The verdict
Affirm Holdings (AFRM) wins this head-to-head comparison against SoFi Technologies (SOFI), primarily driven by its superior profitability metrics and stronger analyst sentiment. While SOFI has shown impressive revenue growth and a history of beating earnings estimates, AFRM's significantly higher net profit margin and return on equity present a more compelling case for investors focused on bottom-line performance. AFRM also benefits from a more constructive analyst outlook, with a higher median price target and a more favorable distribution of ratings. Despite SOFI's recent positive price action and broader market appeal, AFRM's current financial health and market perception give it the edge.
Key difference
The decisive factor separating Affirm Holdings (AFRM) from SoFi Technologies (SOFI) is profitability. AFRM demonstrates a significantly higher net profit margin (45.29%) and return on equity (45.13%) compared to SOFI (14.91% and 7.1%, respectively). This stark difference in financial efficiency and ability to generate returns for shareholders positions AFRM as the more fundamentally sound investment at this juncture, despite SOFI's broader diversification and revenue growth.
Outlook
The outlook for Affirm Holdings (AFRM) appears cautiously optimistic, supported by its strong profitability and positive analyst sentiment. If AFRM can maintain its credit quality and continue to capture market share in the BNPL space, its current valuation may prove to be an attractive entry point. A potential scenario involves continued earnings beats and a narrowing of the gap between its current price and its median analyst target. SoFi Technologies (SOFI) faces a more uncertain outlook. While its revenue growth is strong, the path to sustained profitability across all its business segments remains a key challenge. A positive scenario would involve successful integration of its services and favorable macroeconomic conditions for lending and banking. However, risks related to economic slowdowns and regulatory shifts could lead to underperformance relative to AFRM.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
SOFI AFRM

Over 1 year: SOFI lost 48.1% and AFRM gained 1.3%, a gap of 49.4 points in AFRM's favour.

03

Valuation and profitability

What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation and profitability

What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.

Valuation

Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.

SOFI AFRM
$18.8B Market cap $25.0B
29.7x P/E ratio 14.1x
4.4x Price / sales 6.0x
1.7x Price / book 4.7x
N/A EV / EBITDA 45.9x

Profitability

How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.

SOFI AFRM
+42.6% Revenue growth (quarter, y/y) +33.0%
14.9% Net margin 45.3%
7.1% Return on equity 45.1%
1.2% Return on assets 1.9%
0.31 Debt / equity 1.83
On valuation
Affirm Holdings (AFRM) trades at a P/E ratio of 14.09, significantly lower than SoFi Technologies (SOFI) at 29.69. This suggests that investors are currently willing to pay less for each dollar of AFRM's earnings compared to SOFI. AFRM's price is trading just below its 20-day EMA ($74.04) but above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages ($73.71 and $66.81), indicating a mixed short-term technical picture but a generally positive longer-term trend. SOFI, on the other hand, is trading below all its key moving averages (20-day EMA at $15.73, 50-day SMA at $17.09, 200-day SMA at $18.37), suggesting a weaker technical setup and potentially more downside risk from a valuation perspective, despite its lower P/E. AFRM's current price of $74.01 is closer to its 52-week high of $90.44 than its low of $42.10, indicating strong recent performance. SOFI's price of $14.55 is closer to its 52-week low of $13.86 than its high of $32.73, suggesting it is in a more pronounced downtrend. While SOFI's revenue growth of 42.6% outpaces AFRM's 33%, AFRM's lower P/E and stronger technical positioning relative to its 52-week range make it appear more attractively valued.
On profitability
Affirm Holdings (AFRM) exhibits significantly superior profitability compared to SoFi Technologies (SOFI). AFRM boasts an impressive net profit margin of 45.29% and a strong return on equity of 45.13%, indicating highly efficient operations and strong returns for shareholders. Its return on assets also stands at a healthy 1.93%. SoFi Technologies (SOFI), while showing positive net profit margin of 14.91%, lags considerably behind AFRM in profitability. Its return on equity is a much lower 7.1%, and its return on assets is 1.25%. These figures suggest that SOFI is less effective at generating profits from its assets and equity compared to AFRM, making AFRM the clear winner in terms of current financial efficiency and profitability.

Earnings reality check

Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.

SOFI

Beat the estimate in 3 of 3 reports; fell the next session after 2 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Apr '25Jul '25Jul '26

AFRM

Beat the estimate in 2 of 2 reports; fell the next session after 0 of those beats.

Surprise
Next session
Feb '25Aug '25
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.

SOFI AFRM
43/100 AI score 73/100
34.7 RSI (14-day) 50.4
-14.9% Price against 50-day average +0.4%
-20.8% Price against 200-day average +10.8%
Technicals
SoFi Technologies (SOFI) is currently exhibiting weak technical momentum, with its price trading below its 20-day EMA ($15.73), 50-day SMA ($17.09), and 200-day SMA ($18.37). The RSI at 34.66 indicates bearish momentum, and the Stochastic oscillator at 28.87 suggests oversold conditions, though the MACD at -0.646 shows a bearish trend. Affirm Holdings (AFRM) presents a more mixed but generally stronger technical picture. Its price is trading just below its 20-day EMA ($74.04) but above its 50-day SMA ($73.71) and 200-day SMA ($66.81). The RSI is neutral at 50.35, and the Stochastic oscillator at 47.91 is also in neutral territory. The MACD at 0.836 indicates positive momentum. While SOFI is showing clear signs of weakness across multiple indicators, AFRM's technicals suggest a stock consolidating and holding key support levels, with potential for a rebound.
Sentiment
Analyst sentiment strongly favors Affirm Holdings (AFRM) over SoFi Technologies (SOFI). AFRM has a median analyst target price of $100, significantly higher than its current price of $74.01, and its analyst ratings are overwhelmingly positive, with 6 Strong Buys, 21 Buys, and only 7 Holds, and no Sell ratings from 34 analysts. This indicates strong conviction from Wall Street regarding AFRM's future prospects. SoFi Technologies (SOFI) has a median analyst target price of $19, which is only slightly above its current price of $14.55. Its analyst ratings are more mixed, with 4 Strong Buys, 5 Buys, 11 Holds, and 4 Sell ratings from 24 analysts. The higher median target and the more bullish consensus among a larger analyst pool give AFRM a clear advantage in terms of current market sentiment and perceived upside potential.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk

How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.

SOFI AFRM
42.0% Volatility (30d, yearly) 64.2%
2.33 Beta against the S&P 500 3.82
0.83 Sharpe ratio 0.97
Risk
Affirm Holdings (AFRM) faces risks primarily related to credit quality and competition within the burgeoning Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) sector. A significant increase in defaults or a slowdown in consumer spending could negatively impact its loan portfolio and profitability. Also, regulatory scrutiny of the BNPL industry and intense competition from established financial institutions and other fintech players pose ongoing challenges. SoFi Technologies (SOFI) carries risks associated with its diversified business model, which spans lending, banking, and investment services. Economic downturns that affect consumer borrowing and investment activity could impact multiple segments of its business. Regulatory changes affecting the banking and lending sectors, as well as the execution risk of integrating its various services and achieving sustained profitability across all divisions, are key concerns. SOFI's reliance on interest rate sensitivity in its lending operations also presents a risk if rate environments shift unexpectedly.
ProTips
  1. Focus on AFRM's improving earnings consistency and profitability as key drivers for potential upside.
  2. Monitor SOFI's ability to translate its revenue growth into sustainable profitability and manage its diversified risk profile.
  3. Consider the broader fintech and BNPL regulatory environment, which could impact both companies.
06

Long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)

Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
SOFI
Current: $14.55
ENTRY ZONES
$13.82
$14.55
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$13.41
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$15.28
+10% from current
$16.01
+15% from current
$16.73
AFRM
Current: $74.01
ENTRY ZONES
$70.31
$74.01
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$68.20
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
+5% from current
$77.71
+10% from current
$81.41
+15% from current
$85.11
Disclaimer
This comparison involves assets with varying risk profiles. The content is for educational purposes only. Comparison includes a higher-volatility asset (AFRM). Correlations between assets with different volatility profiles can break down rapidly during market stress. Liquidity risks may prevent execution at displayed prices.

Note: The AI favored AFRM based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
08

Questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do AFRM and SOFI compare on valuation?+
AFRM trades at a lower P/E ratio (14.09) compared to SOFI (29.69), suggesting it is more attractively valued. AFRM's price is also closer to its 52-week high, indicating stronger recent momentum.
How do their profitability margins compare?+
AFRM's net profit margin (45.29%) and return on equity (45.13%) are substantially higher than SOFI's (14.91% and 7.1%), making AFRM the clear leader in profitability.
What is the technical outlook for AFRM and SOFI?+
AFRM shows a mixed but more constructive technical picture, trading above its 50-day and 200-day moving averages ($73.71 and $66.81). SOFI exhibits weaker technicals, with its price below all key moving averages and showing bearish momentum indicators.
Which stock has stronger analyst support?+
AFRM enjoys stronger analyst support with a higher median price target ($100 vs $19 for SOFI) and a more favorable distribution of ratings, indicating greater Wall Street conviction.
How have SOFI and AFRM performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 17, 2026, SOFI's price fell 45.2% and AFRM's rose 9.0%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.
Which is more volatile, SOFI or AFRM?+
AFRM has been more volatile. Over the 30 days to October 17, 2026, SOFI's annualized volatility was 42.0% and AFRM's 64.2%, measured from daily closing prices.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of SOFI vs AFRM is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 17, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.