Head-to-head · Stock vs Stock
SoFi Technologies vs Affirm Holdings, Inc. Class A
The short version
How SOFI and AFRM compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.
The verdict
SOFI and AFRM on the figures that matter most, and which one CleaRank Financial AI prefers today.
Price, side by side
Both prices on one chart, rebased so the moves compare directly.
Rebased price
Both start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the two lines compare directly.
Over 1 year: SOFI lost 48.1% and AFRM gained 1.3%, a gap of 49.4 points in AFRM's favour.
Valuation and profitability
What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.
Valuation and profitability
What each costs against its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.
Valuation
Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.
Profitability
How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.
Earnings reality check
Each company's record against analyst estimates, and how its shares reacted.
SOFI
Beat the estimate in 3 of 3 reports; fell the next session after 2 of those beats.
AFRM
Beat the estimate in 2 of 2 reports; fell the next session after 0 of those beats.
Momentum and sentiment
The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.
Momentum and sentiment
The indicators behind each AI score. Above the 50-day and 200-day averages is an uptrend.
Risk and practical tips
How much each moves, and what to watch if you hold either.
Risk
How much each moves, and how much return each has paid for that risk.
- Focus on AFRM's improving earnings consistency and profitability as key drivers for potential upside.
- Monitor SOFI's ability to translate its revenue growth into sustainable profitability and manage its diversified risk profile.
- Consider the broader fintech and BNPL regulatory environment, which could impact both companies.
Long-term scenarios
Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.
Monte Carlo Projection (10yr)
Simulated growth of $10,000 in each asset, from its own historical volatility and trend. Statistical outcomes, not forecasts.
Trade plans for both
Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.
Actionable Trade Plans
Compare entry, exit, and risk management levels for both assets
Note: The AI favored AFRM based on profitability metrics. This is valid for the specified timeframe only.
Questions people ask
Answered from the figures on this page.
