Reviewed by Shaun David Shaun David Shaun David
Regulation • Trading Algorithms • Market Analysis
I’m extremely passionate about the financial markets and working with innovative technology that makes trading better and safer. Since joining the CleaRank team, my primary role is working with real-time broker performance data using the CLEAR™ technology and broker evaluation methodology. I investigate brokers by testing their platforms and uncovering hidden risks and costs. My end goal is to level the playing field for traders and With an extensive background in market analysis and algorithmic trading, I’m qualified to find what matters most to traders.
using our CLEAR™ Methodology The CLEAR™ Score (Credibility, Leverage, Execution, Accessibility, Regulation) is our proprietary ranking system. The CLEAR™ Score provides you with the most accurate and transparent broker ranking after evaluating all the key factors that are crucial for trading success. .

Last fact check on June 21, 2026 by

Michelle Sofia Michelle Sofia Michelle Sofia
Compliance Analyst • Editorial Review
Michelle is the financial content architect and SEO market analyst at CleaRank, and the final editorial reviewer on every CleaRank publication. With a background in financial journalism and fintech reporting, she fact-checks each broker investigation for accuracy before it goes live.

PipVertex Review 2026

PipVertex is a multi-asset trading platform offering foreign exchange, stocks, indices, commodities, and digital assets. The PipVertex website does not publicly disclose a corporate entity name, registration number, or jurisdiction on its public pages. No operating company is named in the footer, regulatory disclosure section, or terms of service. PipVertex holds no Tier-1 authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, the SEC or the CFTC.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority added PipVertex to its Warning List on 12 June 2026, stating the firm is not authorised by the FCA and may be targeting people in the UK. Clients who deal with PipVertex have no access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and no recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The FCA warning is the primary Tier-1 regulatory record on file for PipVertex.

Our CLEAR investigation gave PipVertex a Failed score of 0.14 / 5. The combination of an undisclosed entity, zero Ahrefs organic traffic, and an FCA warning within the brand’s first operating year places PipVertex in the severe-risk band. Verify any broker’s current risk status using the CLEARCheck Broker Risk Scanner. For comparison see the Hugo’s Way Review and our 24K Markets Review.

Broker Alert
PipVertex logo

Failed CLEAR™ Score: 0.1/5

  • UK FCA Warning List entry, 12 June 2026
  • No entity, registration or jurisdiction disclosed
  • Zero Ahrefs organic traffic as of June 2026
  • Multi-asset platform, no regulated execution venue
  • Withdrawal block complaints on independent forums
  • No Tier-1 licence: FCA, ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, SEC

The FCA Has PipVertex on Its Warning List

One primary-source regulator filing defines the compliance ceiling for any conversation about PipVertex. The FCA warning was issued in June 2026 and remains on file.

FCA UK Warning List, 12 June 2026

The UK Financial Conduct Authority added PipVertex to its consumer Warning List on 12 June 2026. The FCA states that PipVertex is not authorised by the FCA and may be targeting people in the UK. Clients who deal with PipVertex have no access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and no recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The warning remains on file at the FCA consumer Warning List as of June 2026.

Corporate Stack: Operating Entity Not Publicly Disclosed

The PipVertex website does not publicly disclose a corporate entity name, registration number, or jurisdiction. The footer, regulatory disclosure section, and terms of service carry no company registration details. The UK Financial Conduct Authority issued a warning against PipVertex on 12 June 2026, stating the firm is not authorised by the FCA. Without a disclosed entity, there is no public corporate register to verify, no named individual to hold accountable, and no regulatory licence number to check against a Tier-1 authority. The absence of corporate transparency is itself a material red flag for any retail investor.

Ownership map

The PipVertex entity structure

Operating entity not publicly disclosed. FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026. Zero Tier-1 oversight.

Sources
FCA Warning List 12 June 2026, consumer complaint records
Visual: CleaRank Compliance
Tier 1 – Offshore entity

Offshore registration behind the consumer-facing brand.

VC Unknown

Entity undisclosed

Likely St. Vincent & Grenadines

No registration number, no jurisdiction, no named officer disclosed. Pattern consistent with SVG IBC structures used by other FCA-warned operators.

No Tier-1 licence
Tier 2 – Consumer brand
PipVertex  /  Entity undisclosed  /  pipvertex.com
None
FCA – Financial Conduct Authority Warning List entry 12 June 2026. Not authorised by the FCA. No FSCS or Financial Ombudsman coverage.
None
Any Tier-1 licence No licence from ASIC, CySEC, BaFin, SEC or CFTC confirmed as of June 2026.
Tier 3 – Retail traders affected

UK residents targeted without FCA authorisation

FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026 confirms the firm has been targeting people in the UK. Clients have zero FSCS and Financial Ombudsman Service protection.

GBUnited Kingdom
FCA Warning List
Compiled by CleaRank from the FCA Warning List (12 June 2026), Ahrefs API data, and consumer complaint records.
PipVertex entity structure. Operating entity not publicly disclosed. FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026. CLEAR Score 0.14 / 5. Rendered by CleaRank.
PipVertex entity structure. Operating entity not publicly disclosed. FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026. CLEAR Score 0.14 / 5. Rendered by CleaRank.

Ahrefs Audit: Domain Rating 16 With Zero Organic Traffic

Live data from the Ahrefs API for pipvertex.com on 21 June 2026: Domain Rating 16 with zero ranking organic keywords and zero organic monthly visits. The backlink profile is consistent with directory submissions and partner listings rather than editorial coverage. As with other offshore brokers whose FCA warnings arrive within their first year, the absence of organic search presence points to social media or direct outreach as the primary client acquisition channel.

Ahrefs Site Explorer Overview for pipvertex.com, rendered from the Ahrefs API on 2026-06-21. Domain Rating 16, zero organic traffic, zero organic keywords. FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026.
Ahrefs Site Explorer Overview for pipvertex.com, rendered from the Ahrefs API on 2026-06-21. Domain Rating 16, zero organic traffic, zero organic keywords. FCA Warning List entry 12 June 2026.

The Ahrefs country breakdown for pipvertex.com shows zero organic traffic from any jurisdiction as of June 2026. The absence of measurable search traffic does not mean the broker has no reach. The FCA warning from 12 June 2026 confirms PipVertex has been reaching UK-based investors through channels outside the traceable organic search record. Social media distribution and direct outreach leave no organic search footprint but are consistent with the low-overhead operating model of offshore brokers that receive FCA warnings within their first operating year.

The Pattern: Undisclosed Entity With an Active FCA Warning

PipVertex received an FCA Warning List entry on 12 June 2026 without publicly disclosing any corporate entity on its website. The FCA warning establishes that the firm is operating in the UK market without authorisation. The combination of zero organic search traffic, zero paid search presence, no disclosed entity, and an FCA warning within its first year of operation describes the distribution pattern of a firm acquiring clients through social media or direct outreach rather than searchable public infrastructure. That distribution pattern – invisible to standard compliance checks but active enough to attract FCA attention – is the defining operating characteristic of offshore brokers with no regulatory accountability.

Pro Tip from CleaRank: Treat any broker whose country-level traffic contradicts its own restriction policy as if it has already failed regulation. CLEAR-certified Tier-1 brokers like IC Markets, Fusion Markets or Darwinex use real IP-blocking and KYC gates to enforce country restrictions because their Tier-1 licences require it.

Payment Rails and Withdrawal Pattern

PipVertex does not publish a clear payment disclosure on its website. Consumer complaint reports describe withdrawal requests being delayed or blocked, with support response described as slow or absent. The multi-asset offering – forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and digital assets – is presented without any regulated execution venue, custodian, or clearing documentation. Without a Tier-1 licence there are no segregated-fund requirements, no financial ombudsman route, and no external authority able to compel a withdrawal. Card depositors may have a chargeback path through Visa or Mastercard within the standard dispute window of 120 to 180 days from the deposit date.

Smart Pro Tip: If a broker only accepts crypto, mobile wallets, or local rails outside the Visa or Mastercard network, that is a structural sign the operator is trying to evade chargeback protection. Stick to Tier-1 brokers that take SEPA, Faster Payments, Visa, or Mastercard, and verify them with the CleaRank Broker Risk Scanner before depositing.

Customer Complaints: Withdrawal Delays and Non-Responsive Support

Consumer complaint reports on PipVertex describe withdrawal requests being delayed or denied, with support described as non-responsive over extended periods. The pattern is consistent with the operating model of offshore brokers whose income depends on funds remaining on the platform. With no disclosed corporate entity, no Tier-1 regulator, and an FCA warning on file, clients who encounter withdrawal problems have limited formal recourse. Filing a chargeback through Visa or Mastercard remains the most accessible practical option for card depositors within the standard dispute window.

Action Steps If You Are Already a PipVertex Customer

Stop depositing immediately. Do not add another cent regardless of any bonus or recovery promise.

Preserve every record. Save deposit transaction hashes, MetaTrader account statements, chat logs, KYC submissions, every email and every screenshot.

File a chargeback fast if you deposited by Visa or Mastercard. The dispute window is typically 120 to 180 days from the deposit date.

Report the firm. UK: FCA Report an unauthorised firm. US: CFTC SmartCheck. Canada: Ontario Securities Commission. EU: your national regulator and ESMA.

Avoid recovery offers. Anyone offering guaranteed fund recovery for an up-front fee is a second-layer concern. Legitimate chargeback and regulator-complaint paths do not require an up-front fee.

Our Verdict for PipVertex

PipVertex’s 0.14 / 5 CLEAR Score reflects a broker that holds no Tier-1 authorisation, discloses no corporate entity on its website, carries zero Ahrefs organic search presence, and received a UK FCA Warning List entry on 12 June 2026. The combination of undisclosed entity, no regulatory licence, zero search footprint, and documented withdrawal-block complaints describes an operator with no public infrastructure capable of supporting investor protection claims.

Avoid PipVertex. For real ECN execution under a Tier-1 regulator, use a CLEAR-certified broker such as IC Markets (ASIC), Fusion Markets (ASIC), or Darwinex (FCA). Verify any broker through the CleaRank Broker Risk Scanner before depositing.

PipVertex FAQs

No. PipVertex holds no Tier-1 licence. The UK FCA added PipVertex to its Warning List on 12 June 2026, stating the firm is not authorised by the FCA and may be targeting people in the UK.

The operating corporate entity behind PipVertex is not publicly disclosed on the PipVertex website. No company name, registration number, or jurisdiction appears in the footer, regulatory disclosure, or terms of service.

The FCA added PipVertex to its Warning List on 12 June 2026, stating the firm is not authorised by the FCA and may be targeting people in the UK. Dealing with an unauthorised firm means no access to the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and no recourse to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

No. With a 0.14 / 5 CLEAR Score, an FCA warning, no disclosed corporate entity, zero organic traffic, and documented withdrawal-block complaints, PipVertex offers zero investor protection and very limited practical recourse if funds are blocked.

Consumer complaint reports describe withdrawal requests being delayed or denied, with support described as non-responsive. Card depositors may have a chargeback path through Visa or Mastercard within the standard dispute window of 120 to 180 days from the deposit date.

Disclaimer: This review documents the regulatory and compliance risks of an unregulated broker and is not financial advice. Always verify a broker’s licenses and seek professional guidance before trading.

Shaun David Author Image
Shaun David Author Image

Shaun David

Author of this review

I’ve spent majority of my life studying finance and building a successful career from analyzing market trends to spotting successful early adoptions in the crypto industry, and I’ve come to realize I’m not purely analyzing numbers, but the psychology and sentiment of the crowd. As one of CleaRank’s earliest team members I take a hands on approach and personally test brokers by opening real money accounts, executing trades, and stress testing their customer service. Throughout my career I’ve built trading algorithms, managed long term investment portfolios, and helped traders avoid shady brokers before they even knew they were at risk. Whether it’s uncovering hidden fees, evaluating regulatory loopholes, or optimizing trading strategies, I live and breathe the financial markets.

More Broker Alerts

  • VonWay Review

    Updated on
    |
    VonWay holds no FCA, ASIC, or CFTC authorisation. Ahrefs records DR 0 and zero organic traffic for vonway.com. Operating entity undisclosed. Failed CLEAR audit.
  • Fortuno Markets Review

    Updated on
    |
    Fortuno Markets is not authorised by BAPPEBTI and holds no Tier-1 licence. Ahrefs records 4,919 monthly visits – mostly Indonesia. Failed CLEAR risk audit.
  • TradeGF Review

    Updated on
    |
    TradeGF holds no Tier-1 forex licence and Ahrefs records zero organic traffic for tradegf.com in June 2026. Read the Failed CLEAR risk audit.
  • Esperio Review

    Updated on
    |
    Esperio has active FCA, CySEC and CONSOB warnings, an SVG IBC entity with no real licence, and 65 of 170 monthly organic visits from Italy. Failed CLEAR.
  • SovereignFX Review

    Updated on
    |
    SovereignFX has an FCA warning issued June 2026, operates via an FSG Brokers LTD Comoros IBC, and has zero Ahrefs organic traffic. Failed CLEAR.
  • Oron Trade Review

    Updated on
    |
    Oron Trade (orontrade.com) is a Saint Lucia IBC with no SEBI, RBI, FCA or CFTC licence. 5,606 monthly organic visits, 95.7% from India. CLEAR Score: 0.20 / 5.
  • RCG Markets Review

    Updated on
    |
    RCG Markets (rcgmarkets.com) holds only FSCA FSP 49769 with a February 2024 risk warning, no Tier-1 licence, and 29K monthly visits from South Africa.
  • XPO Review

    Updated on
    |
    XPO (xpo.ru) is SEBI and RBI unregistered with 443K monthly visits, 99.9% from India, and an alleged Rs.3,100cr investor loss reported in November 2025.
  • TaeBank Review

    Updated on
    |
    TaeBank Markets markets a FinCEN AML registration as broker authorisation. Sister domain taebankmarkets.com FBI-blocked. Failed CLEAR review.
  • QuickTrade Review

    Updated on
    |
    Independent databases list QuickTrade’s FSCA licence claim as Unverified and report the listed address could not be verified. CLEAR scored it 0.17 / 5.
  • VT Markets Review

    Updated on
    |
    VT Markets routes international clients to an unregulated SVG entity while advertising its ASIC and FSCA licences. FCA warning on file. CLEAR 0.38 / 5.
  • ScoreCM Review

    Updated on
    |
    ScoreCM’s only disclosed licence is from the offshore Mwali (Comoros) registry. No Tier-1 regulator oversees the broker. CLEAR scored ScoreCM 0.23 / 5.
  • Veloc Broker Review

    Updated on
    |
    Veloc Broker is run by XLU COMPANY Ltd from Anjouan, Comoros, with no CVM authorisation for its Brazilian client base. Failed CLEAR review.
  • SeaPrime Capital Review

    Updated on
    |
    SeaPrime Capital operates from an SVG shell address with no SEBI registration while drawing 27,551 monthly visits from India. Failed CLEAR review.
  • My Forex Funds Review

    Updated on
    |
    My Forex Funds was halted by simultaneous CFTC and OSC enforcement in August 2023 with accounts frozen. Failed CLEAR review and fund recovery steps.
  • Kato Prime Review

    Updated on
    |
    Kato Prime targets Malaysia and Indonesia with no confirmed SC Malaysia CMSL or OJK registration and an unverifiable operator entity. Failed CLEAR review.
  • FCX Trade Review

    Updated on
    |
    FCX Trade carries a Belize FSC warning from September 2024 and its claimed UK registration is not on the FCA register. Failed CLEAR review.
  • Sway Markets Review

    Updated on
    |
    Sway Markets ceased all brokerage operations. ASIC CAR 001300469 covers wholesale clients only. SVG entity holds no retail forex licence. Failed CLEAR.
  • BX Trade Review

    Updated on
    |
    BX Trade holds an FCA Warning List entry as an unauthorised firm. The operator is registered in Saint Lucia with a Belgian entity. Failed CLEAR review.
  • Quotex Review

    Updated on
    |
    Quotex holds an expired IFMRRC licence and a CNMV Spain warning. The binary options product is banned across the EU, UK, Australia and Canada. Failed CLEAR.
  • AAFX Trading Review

    Updated on
    |
    AAFX Trading has been on the CFTC RED List since April 2017 and on the Hong Kong SFC Alert List. 1:2000 leverage via an SVG IBC with no real licence.
  • BinaryCent Review

    Updated on
    |
    BinaryCent is CFTC RED-listed since 2019 and FSMA-warned since 2024. The retail binary options product is banned across the EU, UK, Australia, and Canada.
  • OX Securities Review

    Updated on
    |
    OX Securities Pty Ltd and OX Securities Ltd (SV) both added to the CFTC RED List on 29 May 2025. ASIC AFSL is wholesale-only. Failed CLEAR review.
  • HankoTrade Review

    Updated on
    |
    HankoTrade is CFTC RED-listed since July 2022 and 87% of its traffic comes from the US. Read the Failed CLEAR review with Ahrefs and complaint data.
  • Hugo’s Way Review

    Updated on
    |
    Seychelles FSA: Hugo’s Way Ltd struck off 01 April 2025, never authorised. Site still onboarding clients and now ingests an EagleFX partner-UTM funnel.
  • EagleFX Review

    Updated on
    |
    EagleFX is CFTC RED-listed since 2020 and now redirects eaglefx.com to users.hugosway.com under a partner-UTM. Read the Failed CLEAR review.
  • Coinexx Review

    Updated on
    |
    Coinexx is CFTC RED-listed and FCA warning-listed, accepts crypto deposits only, and 76% of its traffic is US. Read the Failed CLEAR review.
  • Pocket Option Review

    Updated on
    |
    Pocket Option is flagged by two live FCA warnings, an Israeli criminal probe and a suspended MISA license. CleaRank scored it 0.3/5 – Failed.
  • MTrading Review

    Updated on
    |
    MTrading earns a Failed CLEAR™ Score due to offshore SVG registration, extreme 1:1000 leverage, illegal targeting of India and Malaysia, and bonus traps.
  • ITBFX Review: High-Risk CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    ITBFX receives a High-Risk CLEAR™ Score in our 2025 review due to bogus offshore registration, dangerously high leverage, questionable traffic sources, and suspicious bonus terms.
  • 24K Markets Review: Failed CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    24K Markets boldly claims to be the “Gold Standard Broker,” but we’ll be blunt—24K Markets is fool’s gold. Their polished website and appeals of “trustworthiness,” may initially throw off the untrained eye, but our investigation revealed a broker that crossed the lines of legitimacy by a fair margin
  • FxSway Review: Failed CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    Let’s cut to the chase: FxSway isn’t just another shady broker—it’s a financial trap masquerading as a legitimate platform. After a rigorous investigation, FxSway received a catastrophic CLEAR™ Score of 0.3/5, failing across all critical categories.
  • Fyntura Review: Failed CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    Our investigation of Fyntura quickly revealed that the name is the only positive aspect of this broker and even that is subjective. Fyntura received a failed CLEAR™ score, debunking their claims of deep liquidity and optimal trading conditions.
  • HeroFX Review: Failed CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    The name of this broker is quite the paradox, as HeroFX is anything but a Hero—more like a sophisticated financial villain. We understand that it’s a bold claim to make straight out of the gate, but we’ve got all the evidence to back it up.
  • FXCess Review: Failed CLEAR™ Score

    Updated on
    |
    FXCess is an online Forex broker operating globally without regulatory oversight, providing financial services illegally in jurisdictions where regulation is mandatory.

View All Failed CLEAR™ Brokers