TradeTrade
Jump to any asset 873 assets, updated daily

Head-to-head · ETF vs ETF

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF vs Global X Silver Miners ETF

ETF·NYSE

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF GDXJ

$103.43 ▲ 3.49%
Sell
31 / 100 AI score
Full GDXJ analysis →
vs

ETF·NYSE

Global X Silver Miners ETF SIL

$74.66 ▲ 0.81%
Sell
29 / 100 AI score
Full SIL analysis →
01

GDXJ vs SIL: the verdict

How GDXJ and SIL compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.

The verdict

CleaRank Financial AI favours GDXJ
GDXJ SIL
31/100 AI score 29/100
+13.3% 1-year change +10.4%
45.3% Volatility (30d, yearly) 41.0%
39.8 RSI (14-day) 29.6
The verdict
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) comes out ahead on CleaRank's model, scoring 31/100 (Sell) against 29/100 (Sell) for Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). The scores are close, and no single factor separates them by much.
Key difference
Size is where the two funds differ most.
Outlook
SIL would need to regain its 50-day average at $90.74 and its 200-day at $91.00 to turn its downtrend.
02

Price, side by side

Both prices start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the moves compare directly.

Rebased price

Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26Jun '26Aug '26Oct '26
GDXJ SIL

Over 1 year: GDXJ gained 5.3% and SIL gained 10.4%, a gap of 5.1 points in SIL's favour.

03

Key metrics

Size and recent performance for each.

Size and market performance

GDXJ SIL
$8.4B Size (net assets / market cap) $4.4B
3.7M Volume (shares, last session) 849,500
23% Position in 52-week range 22%
-13.0% Price against 50-day average -17.7%
Reading
GDXJ costs less to hold. Its expense ratio is 0.52%, while SIL's is 0.65%.
04

Momentum and sentiment

The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.

Indicators side by side

GDXJ SIL
31/100 AI score 29/100
39.8 RSI (14-day) 29.6
-13.0% Price against 50-day average -17.7%
-13.0% Price against 200-day average -18.0%
Technicals
Its 14-day RSI is 33.5, in the bearish zone, with the MACD line negative. SIL is in a downtrend, trading 17.72% below its 50-day average and 17.95% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 29.6, in the oversold zone, with the MACD line negative. SIL sits higher in its 52-week range, at 22% against 18% for GDXJ.
Sentiment
Over the past month GDXJ dropped 17.48%, but over three months it climbed 0.95%. SIL slid 18.46% in the past month and also lost ground over three months, down 1.48%.
05

Risk and practical tips

How much each moves, how much return each has paid for that risk, and what to watch if you hold either.

Risk measures

GDXJ SIL
45.3% Volatility (30d, yearly) 41.0%
0.89 Sharpe ratio 0.96
Risk
They move about the same on an average day, 2.90% for GDXJ and 2.67% for SIL. Their worst falls in the price history were 54.8% for GDXJ (August 2020 to October 2022) and 52.7% for SIL (June 2021 to October 2023).
ProTips
  1. For SIL, watch the 20-day EMA at $82.53 above the price and the 52-week low at $61.80 below it.
  2. Fees add up over time.
06

GDXJ vs SIL: long-term scenarios

Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.

Simulated growth of $10,000

202620282030203220342036
GDXJ median GDXJ 90th SIL median SIL 90th
GDXJ SIL
$3,493 Downside, 2036 (10th) $3,672
$21,148 Base case, 2036 (median) $18,548
$128,035 Upside, 2036 (90th) $93,678

In the median simulated path, $10,000 in GDXJ grows to about $21,100 and $10,000 in SIL to about $18,500 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts.

07

Trade plans for both

Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.

Actionable Trade Plans

Select Your Trade Bias
Risk Tolerance
Conservative 3% Aggressive
Portfolio Value
$ ✎
Position Size: $200 - $300 per asset
GDXJ
Current: $103.43
ENTRY ZONES
$105.50
$103.43
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$108.66
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$98.26
-10% from current
$93.09
-15% from current
$87.92
SIL
Current: $74.66
ENTRY ZONES
$76.15
$74.66
RISK MANAGEMENT
STOP LOSS
$78.44
MAX LOSS
-3%
Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss
Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.
Profit Targets (Based on Conservative)
-5% from current
$70.93
-10% from current
$67.19
-15% from current
$63.46
Disclaimer
The content is for educational purposes only. The verdict weighs trend, valuation and risk together. Trading involves risk of loss.

Note: The AI favored GDXJ based on a weighted view of valuation, momentum and risk, on today's data.
08

GDXJ vs SIL: questions people ask

Answered from the figures on this page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, GDXJ or SIL?+
On CleaRank's model GDXJ scores higher, 31/100 (Sell) against 29/100 (Sell) for SIL. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation.
Which is cheaper to own, GDXJ or SIL?+
GDXJ is the cheaper of the two to hold, with an expense ratio of 0.52% compared with 0.65% for SIL.
Which pays more income, GDXJ or SIL?+
Yield favors GDXJ, at 2.33% against 1.18% for SIL. Yield is the payout divided by the price, so a change in either the payout or the price moves it.
Which is riskier, GDXJ or SIL?+
They carry about the same risk on the measures we track. Average daily move: 2.90% for GDXJ, 2.67% for SIL. Worst fall in the price history: 54.8% for GDXJ, 52.7% for SIL.
Which has stronger momentum right now, GDXJ or SIL?+
The MACD line is negative for both. Readings above 70 or below 30 signal stretched momentum.
How have GDXJ and SIL performed over the past year?+
Over the 12 months to October 28, 2026, GDXJ's price rose 13.3% and SIL's rose 10.4%. These are price changes; dividends are not included.

Disclaimer: CleaRank.com is a financial data and analytics provider, not a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, or financial regulatory body. This AI-generated comparison of GDXJ vs SIL is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or digital assets. The comparison metrics, trade plans, and AI signals are hypothetical, hindsight-based, and simulated. Different asset classes carry different risk profiles - stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, commodities, and forex each have unique regulatory frameworks and risk factors. Market data is provided "as-is" and may be delayed by 15 minutes or more. Past performance does not guarantee future results. You should never invest money you cannot afford to lose. Consult a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Analysis generated on October 28, 2026.

Disclaimer:

Engaging in financial markets carries significant risk of total capital loss. Markets are volatile, unpredictable, and past success does not guarantee future results. Never invest funds you cannot afford to lose. CleaRank does not offer financial, investment, or advisory services. We provide no recommendations, endorsements, or guarantees regarding market outcomes. You alone are responsible for your decisions.

Advertiser Disclosure:

At CleaRank, clarity and transparency are more than ideals, they are the core of our operations. CleaRank is a paid SaaS platform: the Pro and Ultra workbench plans are paid subscriptions, while everything else on this site, including our trading calculators, tools and market news, is free to use. In the spirit of full disclosure: some of our free editorial content contains partner links, and we may earn affiliate commissions from them. This never affects what you pay. Please keep in mind that your confidence in our platform is what matters to us most and we are devoted to earning your trust every day through consistent transparency. CleaRank's Editorial team works independently from partner relationships and financial incentives. All material and information made available by CleaRank stem from our unique technology and methodology which are created to prioritize your needs as a trader and deliver actionable insights to help you make clearer decisions.