{
 "@context": "https://clearank.com/llms.txt",
 "@type": "clearank:AssetComparison",
 "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/",
 "dataUrl": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/data.json",
 "title": "NOC vs LMT: Which Is the Better Buy? (2026)",
 "description": "NOC or LMT? Compare NOC vs LMT, daily AI-powered analysis with technical indicators, price targets, valuation, and a head-to-head verdict.",
 "headline": "Northrop Grumman vs Lockheed Martin",
 "published": "2026-06-14T09:19:16+00:00",
 "modified": "2026-10-22T10:06:04.923+00:00",
 "generated": "2026-10-23T00:04:30.703Z",
 "language": "en-US",
 "publisher": {
  "name": "CleaRank",
  "url": "https://clearank.com/"
 },
 "disclaimer": "Educational and informational only; not financial advice. AI-generated analysis reviewed by Kate Leaman, Financial Journalist and Market Analyst; prices delayed up to 15 minutes.",
 "assets": [
  {
   "ticker": "NOC",
   "dataUrl": "https://clearank.com/stock/northrop-grumman-noc/data.json"
  },
  {
   "ticker": "LMT",
   "dataUrl": "https://clearank.com/stock/lockheed-martin-lmt/data.json"
  }
 ],
 "sections": [
  {
   "id": "ch-verdict",
   "title": "The short version",
   "text": [
    "How NOC and LMT compare today, and what CleaRank Financial AI makes of it.",
    "Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) comes out ahead on CleaRank's model, scoring 67/100 (Buy) against 64/100 (Buy) for Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC). The widest gap is the trend, where NOC is weaker: the price is 9.07% below its 200-day average, and the 50-day average is 11.76% below the 200-day.",
    "NOC sits between its 50-day average at $523.35 and its 200-day at $593.12. LMT sits between its 50-day average at $540.35 and its 200-day at $565.41."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-price",
   "title": "Price, side by side",
   "text": [
    "Both prices start at 0% on the first day of the period you pick, so the moves compare directly.",
    "Over 1 year: NOC lost 10.0% and LMT gained 12.7%, a gap of 22.7 points in LMT's favour."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-fundamentals",
   "title": "Valuation and profitability",
   "text": [
    "What each costs relative to its earnings and sales, and how much of its revenue it keeps.",
    "Lower multiples mean you pay less for each dollar of earnings or sales.",
    "How much of each dollar of revenue becomes profit, and how hard the capital works.",
    "LMT trades on the higher trailing P/E, 20.18 against 16.23 for NOC. Both P/Es are at a discount to peers, against an Industrials median of 34.0. On sales, NOC is valued higher, at 1.69 times against 1.64. LMT is the larger company, worth $127.3B against $76.6B.",
    "NOC turns more of its sales into profit, posting a net margin of 10.48% to LMT's 8.16%. LMT's return on equity is higher, at 89.17% against 26.96% for NOC. Year on year, revenue in the latest quarter grew 5.10% at NOC and 10.50% at LMT. On dividends, NOC yields 1.77% on a trailing basis, while LMT yields 2.50%.",
    "NOC beat the estimate in 6 of its last 7 reports (latest Jul '26); the shares fell the next session after 2 of those beats.",
    "LMT beat the estimate in 4 of its last 6 reports (latest Jul '26); the shares fell the next session after 1 of those beats."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-technicals",
   "title": "Momentum and sentiment",
   "text": [
    "The indicators behind each AI score, side by side.",
    "NOC is in a mixed trend, trading 3.05% above its 50-day average and 9.07% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 64.4, in the bullish zone, with the MACD line positive. LMT is in a mixed trend, trading 2.07% above its 50-day average and 2.46% below its 200-day average. Its 14-day RSI is 63.6, in the bullish zone, with the MACD line positive. LMT sits higher in its 52-week range, at 45% against 23% for NOC.",
    "Of the 26 analysts covering NOC, 14 rate it buy, 11 hold and 1 sell; their median target is $602.50, 11.7% above the price. Of the 23 analysts covering LMT, 10 rate it buy, 12 hold and 1 sell; their median target is $600.00, 8.8% above the price."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-risk",
   "title": "Risk and practical tips",
   "text": [
    "How much each moves, how much return each has paid for that risk, and what to watch if you hold either.",
    "On an average day NOC moves more than LMT, 1.86% against 1.37%. Over the price history, NOC's worst fall was 36.0%, running from March 2026 to October 2026. LMT's worst fall was 30.4%, from October 2024 to February 2025. Taken together, these measures make NOC the riskier of the two.",
    "Which one belongs in your portfolio, NOC or LMT?",
    "This page compares each one on its own. A backtest shows which one adds return to what you already hold without doubling the risk you already carry."
   ],
   "lists": {
    "items": [
     "10-year backtest",
     "Drawdown added",
     "Correlation"
    ]
   },
   "links": [
    {
     "text": "Backtest NOC vs LMT in my portfolioStart free trial · $0 today",
     "url": "https://trade.clearank.com/portfolio/demo?utm_source=clearank&amp;utm_medium=cta&amp;utm_campaign=compare_table&amp;utm_content=trial7"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-scenarios",
   "title": "Long-term scenarios",
   "text": [
    "Simulated paths from each price history. A range of outcomes, not a forecast.",
    "In the median simulated path, $10,000 in NOC grows to about $20,800 and $10,000 in LMT to about $20,400 by 2036. The paths come from each asset's own historical volatility and trend; they are statistical outcomes, not forecasts."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-plan",
   "title": "Trade plans for both",
   "text": [
    "Entry, stop and target levels from each moving average and its volatility. Educational, not advice.",
    "Volatility-Adjusted Stop Loss Calculated based on volatility and technical support levels.",
    "Still deciding between NOC and LMT?",
    "Put both in a portfolio with what you already hold and let the backtest decide: return added, drawdown added, correlation with the rest."
   ],
   "facts": {
    "STOP LOSS": "$508.22"
   },
   "lists": {
    "items": [
     "10-year backtest",
     "Drawdown added",
     "Correlation"
    ]
   },
   "links": [
    {
     "text": "Backtest NOC vs LMT in my portfolioStart free trial · $0 today",
     "url": "https://trade.clearank.com/portfolio/demo?utm_source=clearank&amp;utm_medium=cta&amp;utm_campaign=compare_end&amp;utm_content=trial7"
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-faq",
   "title": "Questions people ask",
   "text": [
    "Answered from the figures on this page."
   ]
  },
  {
   "id": "ch-related",
   "title": "Keep exploring",
   "text": [
    "Other head-to-heads and the sector hub."
   ],
   "links": [
    {
     "text": "View all Industrials sector assets Browse hub →",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/sector/industrials/"
    },
    {
     "text": "GD vs LMT General Dynamics (GD) vs Lockheed Martin (LMT) Comparison $344.71 +0.0784%",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/general-dynamics-vs-lockheed-martin/"
    },
    {
     "text": "LMT vs RTX LMT vs RTX Comparison $551.51 +0.5103%",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/lmt-vs-rtx/"
    },
    {
     "text": "VUG vs QQQ VUG vs QQQ Comparison $89.42 +0.8458%",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/vug-vs-qqq/"
    },
    {
     "text": "VTI vs QQQ VTI vs QQQ Comparison $379.15 +0.5463%",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/vti-vs-qqq/"
    }
   ]
  }
 ],
 "faq": [
  {
   "question": "Which is better, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "On CleaRank's model LMT scores higher, 67/100 (Buy) against 64/100 (Buy) for NOC. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which has performed better over the past year, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "LMT has done better: its price rose 12.67% over the past year, while NOC fell 10.02%."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which is cheaper on earnings, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "NOC has the lower trailing P/E, at 16.23 against 20.18 for LMT."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which pays more income, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "LMT yields more, 2.50% against 1.77% for NOC. Yield is the payout divided by the price, which means it moves whenever either of those moves."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which is riskier, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "NOC is the riskier of the two on the measures we track. Average daily move: 1.86% for NOC, 1.37% for LMT. Worst fall in the price history: 36.0% for NOC, 30.4% for LMT."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which has stronger momentum right now, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "NOC has the higher 14-day RSI, 64.4 (bullish) against 63.6 (bullish) for LMT. Both MACD lines are positive. Readings above 70 or below 30 mark stretched momentum."
  },
  {
   "question": "Which is the bigger company, NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "LMT is the larger company, with a market value of $127.3B versus $76.6B for NOC."
  },
  {
   "question": "What do analysts say about NOC and LMT?+",
   "answer": "NOC has 14 buy ratings out of 26 analysts, and its median target sits 11.7% above the price. LMT has 10 buy ratings out of 23, and its median target is 8.8% above the price."
  },
  {
   "question": "How would $10,000 have grown in NOC or LMT?+",
   "answer": "Invested in October 2016, $10,000 would be worth $29,239 today in NOC and $30,938 in LMT."
  }
 ],
 "related": {
  "peopleAlsoWatch": [],
  "comparisons": [
   {
    "ticker": "GD vs LMT",
    "name": "General Dynamics (GD) vs Lockheed Martin (LMT) Comparison",
    "price": "$344.71",
    "change": "+0.0784%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/general-dynamics-vs-lockheed-martin/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "LMT vs RTX",
    "name": "LMT vs RTX Comparison",
    "price": "$551.51",
    "change": "+0.5103%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/lmt-vs-rtx/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "VUG vs QQQ",
    "name": "VUG vs QQQ Comparison",
    "price": "$89.42",
    "change": "+0.8458%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/vug-vs-qqq/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "VTI vs QQQ",
    "name": "VTI vs QQQ Comparison",
    "price": "$379.15",
    "change": "+0.5463%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/vti-vs-qqq/"
   }
  ],
  "Newly Tracked": [
   {
    "ticker": "SLVR",
    "text": "Sprott Silver Miners & Physical Silver ETF",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/etf/slvr-etf-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "NTES",
    "text": "NetEase, Inc.",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/ntes-stock-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "PCAR",
    "text": "PACCAR Inc.",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/pcar-stock-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "O",
    "text": "Realty Income Corp.",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/o-stock-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "SPG",
    "text": "Simon Property Group Inc.",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/spg-stock-analysis/"
   }
  ],
  "Top Movers (24h)": [
   {
    "ticker": "AXTI",
    "text": "↓ 12.96%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/axti-axt-inc/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "STX/USD",
    "text": "↓ 11.99%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/crypto/stx-usd-crypto-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "XHLD",
    "text": "↓ 11.23%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/xhld-stock-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "CAPR",
    "text": "↓ 11.04%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/capr-stock-analysis/"
   },
   {
    "ticker": "SPOT",
    "text": "↑ 10.43%",
    "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/spotify-spot/"
   }
  ]
 },
 "schema": [
  {
   "@context": "https://schema.org",
   "@graph": [
    {
     "@type": "Place",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/#place",
     "address": {
      "@type": "PostalAddress",
      "streetAddress": "Beni Berman 2",
      "addressLocality": "Netanya",
      "addressRegion": "Center",
      "postalCode": "4249330",
      "addressCountry": "IL"
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Organization",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/#organization",
     "name": "CleaRank",
     "alternateName": "CleaRank Financial AI",
     "url": "https://clearank.com",
     "description": "CleaRank is where retail traders research a trade and practice it before risking money. Its research arm, CleaRank Financial AI, publishes daily analysis, trade plans and 10-year projections for more than 1,000 stocks, ETFs, cryptocurrencies, forex pairs and commodities; each page is built from licensed market data, carries the date it was last updated and is reviewed under CleaRank's published editorial code. The CLEAR™ Score rates online brokers and prop firms on regulation, fees, platform reliability and verified trader experience. The research is free; CleaRank is paid for by subscriptions to its trading workbench (Pro $29 a month, Ultra $59 a month), with a 7-day free trial, which combines a trading simulator, a trade journal that imports from broker history, an AI coach grounded in the trader's own trades, a portfolio generator, visualizer and backtester, a prop-firm challenge auditor and 22 trading calculators and scanners. Some free content contains partner links, which are disclosed and do not affect ratings.",
     "slogan": "Clear data. Honest analysis.",
     "logo": {
      "@type": "ImageObject",
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#logo",
      "url": "https://clearank.com/media/uploads/2025/02/CleaRank-Logo-e1738621466340.jpg",
      "contentUrl": "https://clearank.com/media/uploads/2025/02/CleaRank-Logo-e1738621466340.jpg",
      "caption": "CleaRank",
      "inLanguage": "en-US",
      "width": "336",
      "height": "153"
     },
     "image": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#logo"
     },
     "sameAs": [
      "https://x.com/CleaRank",
      "https://www.linkedin.com/company/clearank/",
      "https://www.youtube.com/@CleaRank",
      "https://t.me/clearank"
     ],
     "email": "info@clearank.com",
     "contactPoint": [
      {
       "@type": "ContactPoint",
       "contactType": "customer support",
       "email": "info@clearank.com",
       "url": "https://clearank.com/contact/",
       "availableLanguage": "en"
      }
     ],
     "address": {
      "@type": "PostalAddress",
      "streetAddress": "Beni Berman 2",
      "addressLocality": "Netanya",
      "addressRegion": "Center",
      "postalCode": "4249330",
      "addressCountry": "IL"
     },
     "location": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#place"
     },
     "knowsAbout": [
      "stock analysis",
      "ETF analysis",
      "cryptocurrency analysis",
      "forex trading",
      "trading simulation",
      "trade journaling",
      "position sizing",
      "risk management",
      "prop firm challenges",
      "online broker regulation"
     ],
     "publishingPrinciples": "https://clearank.com/editorial-code/",
     "ethicsPolicy": "https://clearank.com/editorial-code/",
     "ownershipFundingInfo": "https://clearank.com/about-us/",
     "owns": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#app"
     },
     "founder": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/writer/shaundavidb/#person"
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "WebSite",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/#website",
     "url": "https://clearank.com",
     "name": "CleaRank",
     "publisher": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#organization"
     },
     "inLanguage": "en-US"
    },
    {
     "@type": "ImageObject",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/og/mi/compare/noc-vs-lmt.png",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/og/mi/compare/noc-vs-lmt.png",
     "width": "1200",
     "height": "630",
     "caption": "NOC vs LMT comparison by CleaRank",
     "inLanguage": "en-US"
    },
    {
     "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#breadcrumb",
     "itemListElement": [
      {
       "@type": "ListItem",
       "position": "1",
       "item": {
        "@id": "https://clearank.com",
        "name": "Home"
       }
      },
      {
       "@type": "ListItem",
       "position": "2",
       "item": {
        "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/",
        "name": "NOC vs LMT Comparison"
       }
      }
     ]
    },
    {
     "@type": "WebPage",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#webpage",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/",
     "name": "NOC vs LMT: Which Is the Better Buy? (2026)",
     "datePublished": "2026-06-14T09:19:16+00:00",
     "dateModified": "2026-10-22T10:06:04+00:00",
     "isPartOf": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#website"
     },
     "primaryImageOfPage": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/og/mi/compare/noc-vs-lmt.png"
     },
     "inLanguage": "en-US",
     "breadcrumb": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#breadcrumb"
     },
     "reviewedBy": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/writer/kate-leaman/#person"
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Person",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/writer/kate-leaman/#person",
     "name": "Kate Leaman",
     "jobTitle": "Financial Journalist and Market Analyst",
     "url": "https://clearank.com/writer/kate-leaman/",
     "worksFor": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#organization"
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Article",
     "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#richSnippet",
     "headline": "NOC vs LMT: Which Is the Better Buy? (2026)",
     "name": "NOC vs LMT: Which Is the Better Buy? (2026)",
     "description": "NOC or LMT? Compare NOC vs LMT, daily AI-powered analysis with technical indicators, price targets, valuation, and a head-to-head verdict.",
     "datePublished": "2026-06-14T09:19:16+00:00",
     "dateModified": "2026-10-22T10:06:04+00:00",
     "author": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#organization"
     },
     "publisher": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/#organization"
     },
     "publishingPrinciples": "https://clearank.com/editorial-code/",
     "isPartOf": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#webpage"
     },
     "image": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/og/mi/compare/noc-vs-lmt.png"
     },
     "inLanguage": "en-US",
     "mainEntityOfPage": {
      "@id": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/#webpage"
     }
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "@context": "https://schema.org",
   "@type": "ItemList",
   "name": "NOC vs LMT Comparison",
   "url": "https://clearank.com/compare/noc-vs-lmt/",
   "numberOfItems": 2,
   "itemListElement": [
    {
     "@type": "ListItem",
     "position": 1,
     "item": {
      "@type": "FinancialProduct",
      "name": "Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC)",
      "identifier": [
       {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "propertyID": "tickerSymbol",
        "value": "NOC"
       }
      ],
      "description": "AI-driven analysis of Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC) - price targets, valuation, technicals.",
      "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/northrop-grumman-noc/"
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "ListItem",
     "position": 2,
     "item": {
      "@type": "FinancialProduct",
      "name": "Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT)",
      "identifier": [
       {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "propertyID": "tickerSymbol",
        "value": "LMT"
       }
      ],
      "description": "AI-driven analysis of Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) - price targets, valuation, technicals.",
      "url": "https://clearank.com/stock/lockheed-martin-lmt/"
     }
    }
   ]
  },
  {
   "@context": "https://schema.org",
   "@type": "FAQPage",
   "mainEntity": [
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which is better, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "On CleaRank's model LMT scores higher, 67/100 (Buy) against 64/100 (Buy) for NOC. This describes the data on this page and is not a personal recommendation."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which has performed better over the past year, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "LMT has done better: its price rose 12.67% over the past year, while NOC fell 10.02%."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which is cheaper on earnings, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "NOC has the lower trailing P/E, at 16.23 against 20.18 for LMT."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which pays more income, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "LMT yields more, 2.50% against 1.77% for NOC. Yield is the payout divided by the price, which means it moves whenever either of those moves."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which is riskier, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "NOC is the riskier of the two on the measures we track. Average daily move: 1.86% for NOC, 1.37% for LMT. Worst fall in the price history: 36.0% for NOC, 30.4% for LMT."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which has stronger momentum right now, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "NOC has the higher 14-day RSI, 64.4 (bullish) against 63.6 (bullish) for LMT. Both MACD lines are positive. Readings above 70 or below 30 mark stretched momentum."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "Which is the bigger company, NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "LMT is the larger company, with a market value of $127.3B versus $76.6B for NOC."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "What do analysts say about NOC and LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "NOC has 14 buy ratings out of 26 analysts, and its median target sits 11.7% above the price. LMT has 10 buy ratings out of 23, and its median target is 8.8% above the price."
     }
    },
    {
     "@type": "Question",
     "name": "How would $10,000 have grown in NOC or LMT?",
     "acceptedAnswer": {
      "@type": "Answer",
      "text": "Invested in October 2016, $10,000 would be worth $29,239 today in NOC and $30,938 in LMT."
     }
    }
   ]
  }
 ]
}